honeybee

Here:is some evidence: The five contaminants in Etobicoke (Wards 5 and 6) — carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, ozone, particulate matter, and sulphur oxides — may increase the risk of premature mortality by as much as 7.4 per cent above the baseline, a study released by the City of Toronto this week found. Specifically, the pollutants responsible for the risks are fine particulate matter, known as PM 2.5, and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). PM 2.5 is particulate matter that measures 2.5 microns in diameter or less. It penetrates the respiratory more easily than larger particles. -- Clearing the air: How commuting in Toronto is putting us at risk ( http://globalnews.ca/news/1087619/toronto-air-pollution-how-commuting-is-killing-us/ )

The sound is too weak that most people can not hear it or easy to forget it. I did not deny Beijing has pollution, Toronto has too. But western media try to give people impression that it is much worse than actual.

Guardian is a western media too. The rule is the country is not friend (no satisfied amount of profit can be made), There will be only negative news. almost no positive news. That is for people inside that country to hate its government, and outside that country to support war, sanction, and others. It is obviously (not a conspiracy) that media always try to hide truth by misleading people, so many people know China pollution but so few people know that there is child die every 10 or 15 second in the world due to hunger. Why media care about more China pollution more children in the world? Are the satellites of the United States worse than Russia, if not, why you don't know that IS oil go to Turkey before Russia make you know it? That is not conspiracy, that is fact.

You have been brain washed by western media too. If western media constantly release photos of Toronto in mist and ignore most clear air Toronto images, and always explain those pictures as pollution, then even people in Vancouver can believe Toronto's pollution is much more serious than actual. That what western media always does, why they do like that? the small amount of people who controlled the governments of US, Canada, and others, the real dictators want Arabian Spring happen in China too, they want to destroy Chinese government, and convert it into smaller "democracy" governments, so that they can let the people who can make more profit for them "elected" to be the leader of those countries. Just they want to use IS to destroy Assad government, because Assad does can help Russia, and Russia does not let those people profit in Russia. So even Saudi Arab dictator should be a friend, even a democracy elected Yanukovych should be the enemy. Turkey government must have no relationship with IS oil even with satellite image, And Assad has to be have relationship with IS even IS attack his army. CO2 must make the earth warm even when water vapor as a green house gas is much more than CO2 and created by the sea, because restrict CO2 can restrict developing country from developing. Everything has to be talked by US version, must meet US interest. Otherwise, truth has to be lie, lie has to be truth.

Climate change, whether to warm or cold, is caused by the sun. It has nothing to do with the activities of human being, especially has nothing to do with CO2 that human created, because the amount of CO2 compare with the amount of the other green house gas -- water vapor -- can be omitted. The UN Climate Change Summit is controlled by the US, the aim is the restrict the developing countries from developing, so that the US can keep sucking the blood from those countries. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52Mx0_8YEtg

I would like to go on if I am not so lazy and not for: BTW, anyone can write in his own blog to talk about any absurd theory, so that you can quote it.

Those are only hypothesis that has many controversy, recent finding shows that Asia people need not to migration from Africa, Research on dental remains unearthed from the newly excavated Fuyan Cave in Daoxian County has placed modern humans in southern China at least 80,000 years ago, that is, approximately 20,000 years before modern lineages were thought to have left Africa. These findings are shedding light on the complexity of modern human dispersal routes acros… http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v16/n12/full/nrg4039.html You used unconfirmed content to support your argument, it is clearly not cogent. No proof at all.

Employee takes more risk than employer, because most employer takes limited responsibility of the company, Employer's life does not affected much when the company bankrupted, However, employee's life situation will be changed very big when he lost a job due to company bankrupt. That is much bigger risk.

How ridiculous your comments are! Ainu people are white people, I guess they were flee from Turkey because of Crusades conflict, so that "In 1264, Ainu invaded the land of Nivkh people controlled by the Yuan Dynasty of China, resulting in battles between Ainu and the Chinese." In my previous post, I have quoted Chinese ancient history book, which said that China had set administration department there at least at 725 AD in Tang Dynasty, which is at least 500 years before Ainu people invade that area.

Employee risk the opportunity to work in another company when current company bankrupt. The other company can no longer have job opening when current company bankrupt. And may lost promotion opportunity if work in another company. Those are risks.

It belonged to China since Tang Dynasty. The Chinese name of those islands is "a thousand islands" which was found at least 1000 years before Russia and Japan. In Tang Dynasty, those islands was managed by "KuShuo" Island (Now, it named "KuYe" Island (Sakhalin Island), which belong to "HeiShui DuHuFu" Kuril Islands were in the ship route at that time between Sakhalin Island and Kamchatka Peninsula which at 1000 years ago was another country called "LiuGui" The following is from 2 books 1000 years ago:

Japan don't like call Russia a friend because it dreamed to take back the land from Russia that previously they take from China. And US support that, because US want to be the dictator ruler of the whole world, but Russia has nuclear weapons. US world love Japan be the bullet (similar as Turkey) to harass Russia and China. Most Japanese are the offspring of Chinese who moved to Japan 2000 years ago, but now, their leaders like to get some crumbs by act as a dog for the US.

In most time, it is not rewarded, too many jobs are just payed by minimal wages. By 2014, the number of minimum wage worker s in Ontario had increased to 695,000. ( http://weareontario.ca/wp-content/uploads/OCF-Backslide-2015.pdf ).Most of the value they created was taken by others. When an employee work fo the company, he also has risk too, if company deserve money, employee deserve it too.

Most people's wage are unlikely to increased when he/she do better, lots of people works hard just for avoid be laid off, because too many people want that job. So company need not to pay the full extra value the employee added. But machine need to be operated or maintained by people, the value is created by those people, if the owner operate the machine, then the owner is self-employed worker. The owner should only take the tool rental price if the owner is not involved in the working process.

You are ignoring the importance of worker. when 2 different worker sell coffee, one sell much more coffee than the other, but they both receive same salary (such as minimum legal wages), so the value employer take from the 2 workers are different. part of the value added IS taken by the capitalist. And in the most cases, 'capital' is only a tool, tool itself does not create value, only when worker use it, it create value. The problem is caused by the people who work, who create value does not own the tool that necessary for creating value. that makes exploitation possible. You may say capitalist can invest in a stock market and gain money, but that is just like gambling (except the small part of the values that workers in a company added to a stock), gambling itself does not create values, it just re-distribute values.

It looks like that all of these are what US like to see to make the rest of the world a mess so that it can stop money flow out of America and flow back to the United States. http://truthinmedia.com/flashback-ben-swann-truth-in-media-syria/ Fast forward to today: ISIS- a group that once was quite small and struggling to gain power- easily absorbed members of the Free Syrian Army and al Qaeda-affiliated Al Nusra Front due to U.S. government involvement, and is now the most formidable terror organization on the planet. Following the publication of this Truth In Media episode, mainstream media reports began surfacing stating that “weapons were being given to Syrian rebels.” According to CNN, the weapons were not American-made, but they were “funded and organized by the CIA.”

In a free market, salaries does not pay the value that people add, it pay the price of the worker in labor market, when there are more people waiting for a job that require a particular skill set, the price goes down, when less people have that skill available at job market, the price goes higher, the labor can create much more value than its price, that extra part is taken by the employer. Using tax for basic social services are a concept of socialism, it is not a concept capitalism. According to middle school text book in China, there is no communism country in the world, communism is only a belief that some people have. So, no one has even seen what communism looks like, how can you know communism will be corrupt. If you are talking about China instead of communism, then Canada is much more bureaucracy than China. In Canada, a birth certificate takes a year to be received after a child’s birth, I never heard of anything like this will likely to happen in China. If you stay in China for a long time, you will be able to easily found China is much more efficient than Canada when you try to do something. In Canada, too many times when I go to an office, no one will solve problem for you, they ask you to go somewhere and call some machine answer telephone. And Canada has corruption too, and what is more, 9% of tax dollars of each year will go directly to private banks as interest legally, that is much worse than corruption. This just have no difference with robbery. And this makes companies suffered from too high cost, so they cannot compete with their foreign counterpart, this is the fundamental reason that lots of Canadian companies, such as Zellers, Nortel and many others, cannot survive in Canada unless they cheating like Loblaw by keep changing best-before-date on food labels again and again.

In a capitalism country, workers have to work to make living, they produce values, and get salary, salary is less than what they created, so, capitalist takes the rest part of the value workers created. In a socialism country, workers created values, and get salary, which is less than what they created, the rest part taken by the state, the state will give that to where it need, like give to poor people, and much other welfare. In a communism country, workers create values, they don’t need salary, take whatever they need, because material is too abundant, because science and technology is too advances, and it is too far away and may not be realized in our life time according to a China middle school text book. And China never said it is a communism country, it said it is a socialism country. Actually, now China, Canada and US are all mixed economy country, there are too many similarities. China has a much bigger market economy than Canada, it also has planning economy. In US, more and more state actions on economy, the state give Wall Street fat cats lots of money in name of save the banks by taking tax dollars from poor workers. Isn’t that socialism/communism elements? The difference is only the money was not give to poor people. Actually now in Canada, too many people take the value that created by a worker. A worker need to pay mortgage to buy a house, a big part is taken as mortgage interest, in the tax dollars he gives, 9% of it will be pay to bankers as interest that government borrow from private banks instead of bank of Canada. In this way, the value created by Canadians flowing continuously to the bankers, that’s why Canada’s economy becomes worse and worse, because it is bleeding for so many years and never stop since the government decide to borrow money from private bank instead of bank of Canada. Again in this socialism/communism model, that part of money take from workers are not giving to poor people that need it. As for the bloodness, what you said about Mao is mostly lies. And in the 100 years before Mao controlled China since British capitalism invade China start from Opium Wars, 10s of millions people died by capitalism, just like 100 million aboriginal people dead by Europe capitalist invade, and like what Europe invaded Africa, Australia and other places. In the 21 century, most people lived under capitalism, and most people died in wars are in the wars started by US or its followers.

Communism is just one of the approaches try to solve the problems created by capitalism. If there were no bloody capitalism, there would be no communism at all. History is full of examples on how bloody Capitalism is.

I wonder if you know what communism is after so many decades of brain wash. According to International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Article 19 of the ICCPR states that "everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice". 2 years ago, the Liberal leader was asked which nation he admired most. He responded: "There's a level of admiration I actually have for China. Their basic dictatorship is actually allowing them to turn their economy around on a dime." But this makes mainstream media, which are controlled by several US big families, angry, they said “Justin Trudeau's 'foolish' China remarks spark anger”, so Trudeau has to revise his comment, according to CBC: If you have to explain, said the fallen Liberal leader, you've already lost. The weekend after his Toronto "Ladies" night, Ignatieff's successor had some explaining to do. "The point I made," Justin Trudeau insisted — illustrating that he'd better explain it again, and fast — "was that, despite all of our freedoms ... we are up against countries that play by different rules that we would never accept." Ah. Too bad he didn't put it that way while Sun TV's camera was rolling, watching for any slip-up to wave before the nation's horrified eyes. Of course, what Trudeau actually said was catnip to Sun News, and to the Conservative Party, and to the NDP. What Trudeau actually said was that he had "a level of admiration ... for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say 'we need to go greenest, fastest — we need to invest in solar.' I mean, there is a flexibility that I know Stephen Harper must dream about of having a dictatorship that he can do everything he wanted, and I find that quite interesting." Poor Trudeau, how sad he was that he has no freedom and no right to hold his opinion without interference when he was talking about “all of our freedoms”. And you will have no freedom of speech if you think about "different rules". what an exact same reason compare this with Islamic extremists. And because of the "different rule", you have to deny all the achievements made by China, deny any bright side in China, even by telling lies. That is the true situation of freedom of speech in Canada. The Logic is clear: In China, people have the right to hold the opinions such as "US, Canada is better than China" and express on mainstream media without interference. In Canada, people have not the right to hold the opinion such as "China is better than Canada and US" without interference if he choose to express on mainstream media. See above, JT has a different opinion with you on why China's economy grows faster.

The request of apology is against freedom of speech because it is ask a person to renounce his faith. And the fact is even if she apologized, she still have no chance to keep her work to put her voice heard-able in mainstream media. An example is the case of Liberal candidate Maria Manna, which you choose to ignore, she still has to resign after apologized against her faith. The way HRT used that rule is against freedom speech and human right, because the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal is ordering to the minister to renounce his Christian faith, since his opposition to homosexuality is based upon the Judeo-Christian Bible. When mainstream media has been blocked, most people will not be able to think alternative way, that is called brain wash. That is why I called it less freedom of speech than China.

Flat earth and communism are different. Flat earth has already been proved to be wrong because people have already gone to outer space and seen the earth as a planet. Communism is a system model like capitalism. They both have advantages and disadvantages. Capitalism keep meet seriously problems these years. There are many people support communism, there are many people protest capitalism even in an environment mass media have been controlled by capitalism, and communism has been strongly biased. The difference is somewhat similar with math and philosophy, math class all over the world said 1+1=2, however, in philosophy class, it has to include different ideas and does not give final conclusion for many questions. The fact that there is almost no pro-communism article and especially no pro-China article in Canada's main stream media shows Canada's freedom of speech is far worse than China. Mao has already done very well compare with the economy before 1949 and compare with Zimbabwe which is currently under US sanction similarly. And Mao has created the infrastructure and educated people, based on which China’s economy developed fast later. Before 1949, China cannot make even a nail, in Mao’s time china created a full functional industry system that can make from cars, ships, medicines, to satellites. In Mao’s time most children can go to school include girls. That is a big difference compare with time before 1949. Every country has corruption problems include Canada, and in US, politicians can accept large sum of money “legally”, and can launch an Iraq war to increase oil price that can make president family business oil industry earn more money. What Canada have vast waste problem, such as dig subway tunnels and fill back after another election, create a nuclear power plant, then move it after change a politician, use tax dollar forever every time a new politician elected to study why subway is better or LRT is better... Other than bias on Mao and other false understanding or interpretation that I have pointed out before, you have made a conclusion too hasty . Maybe you have to make a different explanation after 10 years.

After WWII, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore get full support from west world, At same time, China suffered sanction just like Iraq did before the Iraq war. And even worse after refuse Soviet Union's unfair request. That is not Mao's fault, actually, Mao use limited resource created a full function of all aspects of economy that can be stand independently without trade with other countries, that is one of the most important reason of China's later grow fast. The other important reason is how that government selected, it is not same with the Canadian style, in China state leaders need to start at a very low level, he/she must have sound achievement in a small organization, big organization, district, town, city, province, fulfill all the necessary task, he has to pass each step to get the qualification of the next step. So all high level leaders have considerable experience, that's why they know how to develop economy, like JT, Obama, if in China maybe can only lead a small town. You can easily see, with such kind of leadership in US and Canada, why the economy goes so slow. One thing that you are right, it is not communism make China grow fast, it is other reason, include the above 2. I mentioned pro-communism is just to tell you that Canada's freedom speech is worse than China.

You can ignore any positive aspect in China compare to Canada and ignore any negative aspect in US or Canada compare to China although I have mentioned more than once in previous post. Jan Wong lost job is for her political incorrectness, Liberal candidate Maria Manna who expressed skepticism about the Sept. 11 attacks in the U.S. has to resign. The Alberta Human Rights Tribunal has forbidden evangelical pastor Stephen Boisson from expressing his moral opposition to homosexuality. The tribunal also ordered Boisson to pay $5,000 “damages for pain and suffering” and apologize to the “human rights” With so many terrible things happened, how many people would like to risk to express themselves if they have some serious different opinions. That's why you can not hear those in mainstream media. Only some trivial "different opinions" "against" government left, compare the different opinion in China mainstream media, it almost can not be called different political opinions. That why I believe China has more freedom of speech than Canada. You selectively ignore the facts the almost no mainstream media has any pro-communist articles. So you can not prove if anyone will be sent to jail for some strong political incorrectness in Canada. In US, Private Bradley Manning is in jail. And Snowden is still in Russia. You can just continue addict in blaming Chine like sing in a Choir, you can addict in blaming before the Parliament Hill everyday waiting China do real develop works and waiting for Money flooding out of Canada and Canada’s basic balance fell from a surplus measuring 4.2% of Canada’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to a deficit of 7.9% of the GDP. ( http://fusion.net/story/226258/canada-losing-money-basic-balance/ ) Unfortunately, China is not your home, you can not define how to use a place in China and let them do according your suggestion. I will never try to tell you the correct usage of any room in your house.

How many issues said by the people before Parliament Hill solved? That is not the way to solve problems. As for some people get fired, is Canada better than China? Can Canada media hold some different opinion? I did not see any pro-Communist article in Canada mainstream media, but there are many pro-Canada, pro-USA article in China main-stream media. That's the point shows China has more freedom of speech than Canada. Jane Wong published the article "Get under the desk" in The Globe and Mail on September 16, 2006.[11] In it, the author drew a link between the actions of Marc Lépine, Valery Fabrikant and Kimveer Gill, assassins of the shootings of the École Polytechnique, Concordia University and Dawson College respectively, and the existence in Quebec of bill 101, the "decades-long linguistic struggle". She implied a relation between the fact that the three were not old-stock Québécois and the murders they committed, since they were, according to Wong, alienated in a Quebec society concerned with "racial purity". Prime Minister Stephen Harper denounced Wong's article in a letter to the newspaper published on September 21, 2006 saying that her "argument is patently absurd and without foundation."[13] On September 20, the House of Commons unanimously passed a motion requesting an apology for the column.[14] -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Wong Wong descended into a long period of deep depression following the controversy and, unable to work, went on sick leave. The Globe ordered her back to work,[6] withdrew her sick pay and ultimately negotiated her dismissal with an undisclosed monetary settlement.[15][16][17] According to Wong: "I wrote a feature story that sparked a political backlash, my employers failed to support me and later silenced me, and after I became clinically depressed, they fired me.”[15]