M.Dancer Posted September 11, 2007 Report Posted September 11, 2007 If a Canadian company wishes to raise capital in the US, that company must file and comply with the SEC. If an CANADIAN company wishes to raise capital in Canada, that company must file and comply with: EVERY SINGLE PROVINCIAL REGULATOR! This inefficiancy compounds the costs related to issuing IPOs (legal fees x 10) and slows economic growth. Royal Bank of Canada senior executive Barbara Stymiest ( and EX-TSX Chief) slammed Canadian securities laws in her presentation."We need to rethink government and regulatory policies for business in the context of Canada's ability to compete in the future," she said at the all-day policy conference, attended by party Leader Stéphane Dion, party finance critic John McCallum, Michael Ignatieff and other MPs and senators. http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/st...TPStory/robNews Flaherty has also called for a single regulator eBut Quebec and others say pooh pooh http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/st...ry/robNews/home OTTAWA — Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says the summer credit crunch is indisputable proof of the need for a single Canadian securities regulator: one that could better guard against, and fend off, shocks buffeting this country's capital markets.“There's no question. We'd be better equipped going forward to respond and act in response to these types of events with one common securities regulator in Canada,” Mr. Flaherty said in an interview. http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/st...BNStory/robNews And typically, Quebec wishes to remain distinct and uncompetitive. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
geoffrey Posted September 12, 2007 Report Posted September 12, 2007 The cost and burden are largely overstated, but a single regulator would be nice. Ontario still calls all the shots and everyone complies with their directives as of now anyways. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Pliny Posted September 12, 2007 Report Posted September 12, 2007 The cost and burden are largely overstated, but a single regulator would be nice. Ontario still calls all the shots and everyone complies with their directives as of now anyways. So all the costs (even though "largely overstated") are essentially a fee for doing business. Sounds mafia-like...er..like government. Quote I want to be in the class that ensures the classless society remains classless.
M.Dancer Posted September 12, 2007 Author Report Posted September 12, 2007 So all the costs (even though "largely overstated") are essentially a fee for doing business. Sounds mafia-like...er..like government. Well, law firms make bundles of cash working on the filings.....then they are the vaious consultants and filing fees....it is cited as a reason why foreignb firms don't cross list in Canada.... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Pliny Posted September 13, 2007 Report Posted September 13, 2007 Well, law firms make bundles of cash working on the filings.....then they are the vaious consultants and filing fees....it is cited as a reason why foreignb firms don't cross list in Canada.... Have to keep the lawyers busy. Quote I want to be in the class that ensures the classless society remains classless.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.