jbg Posted July 4, 2007 Report Posted July 4, 2007 Rightleaning cultural groups and political parties, and I don't mean cultural groups of the type who sip tea and make approving noises at shitty art and turgid prose, are gaining in popularity from France to Sweden, in response to whole geographic areas being taken over by the Musselmen, who quite openly and proudly prey on the inhabitants. Welfare rolls have swelled beyond any hope of the welfare state continuing, rapes are rampant, and crimes are skyrocketing. The only country fighting back even a bit is Denmark...every other country seems under the thrall of multicult, and everyone is dearly afraid of raising their voice lest they be scorned, or arrested, for "racism." Meanwhile, the pro-eurounion pro-multicult governments...the ones on their way out one way or another...are running around in a sort of neverneverland of meetings and feelgood fetes reminiscent of the last days of Rome or the Berlin bunker. And through all this, the MSM either says nothing or minimizes it to the point of insignificance. What we'll see in the days to come, as the Musselmen get noisier and more dangerous and European governments give way to increasingly hardline governments, is the MSM expressing it's befuddlement. But, if the past is anything to go by, the MSM will at least at first try to atomize the phenomenon and call each overthrow a "protest vote," as it did recently in the French election. Thus my point that Continental Europe may well swing to a bloody reaction rather rapidly from excessive tolerance. The elites want tolerance; the common man or "rabble" sees everything they've worked for being ripped to pieces. Only when the elites' prerogatives, such as free travel, are endangered do they lift a finger. Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.