Exxon cuts ties

[B. Max]

considering the quality of your, 'evidence,' - you'd be better off presenting none

Actually that's not evidence it's proof. Which is something the man made global warming screwballs don't have.

[Guthrie]

proof?? hahahahhaha of what??? where in that letter is the phrase, 'windfall tax,' even uttered.

proof heheheh

[B. Max]

proof?? hahahahhaha of what??? where in that letter is the phrase, 'windfall tax,' even uttered.

proof heheheh

That came before and after the letter. Before from Pelosi and gang, after from two senators. The letter its self is way out of line.

[Guthrie]

[Canadian Blue]

it was Exxon who pulled the plug on those clowns who defend pollution -- rant? I don't rant, I present facts --- and for some reason, you've decided to leech on to me as if I was your personal project for this years fascist camp

hydrogen vehicles? how many of them are on YOUR block? more to the point, how many hydrogen fueled bread trucks are there?

I'm betting you've never actually been involved in a boycott.

pathetic

Well, two sentences with absolutely no information to back it up is called a rant. Especially when somebody uses childish comparison's.

I'm not a fascist, I'm more of a libertarian liberal, I just think ignorant people should try backing up their argument's.

You can buy a hydrogen vehicle, a hybrid, etc.

I have been involved in a boycott, I'm currently boycotting Wal Mart because I disagree with their policies.

The only pathetic person here, is the one who can't come up with anything more than pathetic as a response because their too lazy to try to back up their argument.

considering the quality of your, 'evidence,' - you'd be better off presenting none

The pot calling the kettle black.

[Guthrie]

...ignorant people should try backing up their argument's...

do you put up stuff like this intentionally? subtle sarcasm? or are you just as you appear?

[Canadian Blue]

do you put up stuff like this intentionally? subtle sarcasm? or are you just as you appear?

Well, I actually attempt to back up my arguments son.

As well why would you attack someone for not using quality fact's, when you rarely ever refer to any sources in order to back up your point's, that's just hypocrisy.

Thing about it this way, if your in a debate with someone would you want to be able to reference your argument's, and be able to back them up from credible sources, or would you only use two sentence responses which can be easily discounted as partisan rhetoric.

By the way, instead of using the bread truck's, make your own bread. Cut down on your consumption of gasoline, and stop using Exxon products.

[Guthrie]

CSMonitor

...More than 120 scientists across seven federal agencies say they have been pressured to remove references to "climate change" and "global warming" from a range of documents, including press releases and communications with Congress. Roughly the same number say appointees altered the meaning of scientific findings on climate contained in communications related to their research.

These findings, part of a new report compiled by two watchdog groups, shed new light on complaints by a scattering of scientists over the past year who have publicly complained that Bush administration appointees have tried to mute or muzzle what researchers have to say about global warming.

...

once again, while the right wing toady apologists are blaming, 'the left(?)' for silencing the corporate pseudoscience fairy tale writers --- the reality comes bursting out.

The reality of Global Warming is recognized by all scientists with an unbiased opinion. The Buschistas are trying to prevent the truth from coming out and using bureaucrats to do it.

the sad part is, you guys are just such pathetic suckers - you don't even realize what it is you are supporting