jbg Posted February 5, 2007 Report Posted February 5, 2007 So what, do you think that Canada should have to give a reason acceptable to to the US for not letting a US citizen into Canada? Closer call. There are parts of the US accessible only through Canada. What instance do you have in mind? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Wilber Posted February 5, 2007 Report Posted February 5, 2007 So what, do you think that Canada should have to give a reason acceptable to to the US for not letting a US citizen into Canada? Closer call. There are parts of the US accessible only through Canada. What instance do you have in mind? Any instance. We don't have a right to enter a country unless we are citizen of that country. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
jbg Posted February 5, 2007 Report Posted February 5, 2007 So what, do you think that Canada should have to give a reason acceptable to to the US for not letting a US citizen into Canada? Closer call. There are parts of the US accessible only through Canada. What instance do you have in mind? Any instance. We don't have a right to enter a country unless we are citizen of that country. I mean, when did the US take Canada to task for not letting someone in? And what about Alaskan access? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Wilber Posted February 5, 2007 Report Posted February 5, 2007 I mean, when did the US take Canada to task for not letting someone in? And what about Alaskan access? I don't know that they ever have, I'm just stating that no one has a right to enter someone else's country. Alaska has nothing to do with anything. Americans don't have a right to transit Canada going to Alaska any more than Canadians have a right to transit the US going to Mexico. If an American who Canada finds undesirable wants to go to Alaska or Point Roberts, they would either have to fly or take a boat. Same goes for Canadians wanting to go to Mexico if the US didn't like them. Quote "Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.