Jump to content

Hey France!


KrustyKidd

Recommended Posts

- Liberty. They have 25 million of them in country. Just help in showing them what freedom is.

"Failure is not an option." - Bush, reffering to the rebuilding of Iraq and installing a democratic government.

"I cannot believe that any European who was opposed to the war in Iraq can imagine it's in Europe's interests for Iraq to fail," Nicholas Burns, the U.S. ambassador to NATO, urging allies not to turn their backs on Iraq Tuesday.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/20...ng-troops_x.htm

KK

The heavy lifting is done. Sure it's dangerous but to turn away now is morally wrong. If you do not like the US then at least look at it from the Iraqi person's perspective. The help of the world for a short period and they get democracy and a shot at a great life, in return the world gets a strong, self governed industrialized member country that will be a stabilizing force in the region. A shining example of non Zionist prosperity and the beginning of what may be a de-infesting of terrorist breeding conditions the world over. If the US has to go it alone then it may take years, lots of money and more death than it would be if they had help but they know it is the right thing to do. To not help now is to risk terrorism in the future, all for the sake of being in a snit over the US going it without the blessing of the UN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's unfair Nova!

The French have made several major contributions to the art of war and military science!

Didn't they invent the white flag of surrender?

During the Second World War, they clearly had a well developed special forces capability, as once the Allies had arrived, every citizen of France who was a collaborator was instantly revealed to have "really" been part of the resistance.

The exploits and capabilities of the French Foriegn Legion are well known and proven. Of course, French citizens are prohibited from joining this organization, so that speak volumes.

The French are also responsible for some of the most vital and instructive quotes on military arts. Who can forget "Guard the cliffs? The British could never climb those cliffs!" or "We are safe behind the Maginot Line".

They also achieved an interesting military feat, a decade before the USAmericans: They had their asses kicked by the Vietnamese...before they were supported by the Chinese or Russians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, it was a bit unfair.

The exocet missile is downright mean. However, it's not downright evil like the Russian P-700 Granit. That badboy has "carrier killer" written ALL over it.

Let's see what the Exocet has killed/maimed:

In March 1987 a Mirage F-1 fighter fired French Exocet missiles into the hull of the USS Stark killing 37 Navy seaman.

At 2:04 p.m. the missile struck amidships on the starboard side, ripping a 4-by-15-foot hole from her auxiliary machine space to her forward engine room. By that time, the Argentine pilots had banked sharply away, returning to low-level flying on the westward trek home. HMS Sheffield burned well into the night before sinking.

The MV Atlantic Conveyor is hit by an Exocet missile and sinks 3 days later, 12 more British dead.

The cruiser HMS Glamorgan is hit by an Exocet missile as it was bombarding on shore Argentine positions. 13 British die.

It's a superb weapon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Boydfish,

There is an excellent book called Devil's Guard about some ex-waffen SS troops who served with the legion in Indo-China. I have read it a few times, a very interesting book. I does pretty much tell why the French lost, but it was for the same reason the US also lost. Dissension at home, not Dien Bien Phu. Besides, they (as with the US) never fully understood the enemy or guerilla warfare.

The exocet, is indeed a fine wepon, nova. In it's day the Mirage was a desirable jet, also. However, the French (apart from the legion) have not produced any generals or troops of any calibre for some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly that is true. The new exocet is excellent weapon, possibly only overshadowed by the "shipwreck."

However, without nukes both weapons are inferior to the new type of anti-ship missile.

The new types do not actually hit the ship. They dive under, or as a torp, explode underneath the ship, creating a huge vaccum, which literally snaps the ship in two. The modern Us and Brit ships can take multiple missiles without sinking. They however, cannot take a vaccum underneath their hull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • User went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...