Electric Monk Posted September 10, 2006 Report Posted September 10, 2006 As far as I saw, a respected member of a riding association on Vancouver Island put forward a resolution that Canadian soldiers were "acting like terrorists" in Afghanistan. Layton and others refused to state a position because "the party would not comment on any motion that has not been adopted by its membership." This has been taken as agreement? Why? Isn't the point of these resolutions that they are discussed and accepted/rejected/modified at party meetings? I can't read minds, can anyone else here? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.