Guest Warwick Green Posted May 29, 2006 Report Posted May 29, 2006 A judge's decision to sentence a 5-foot-1 man to probation instead of prison for sexually assaulting a child has angered crime victim advocates who say the punishment sends the wrong message. But supporters of short people say it's about time someone recognizes the unique challenges they face. District Judge Kristine Cecava of Cheyenne County Court issued the sentence last week. She told Richard Thompson that his crimes deserved a long prison sentence but that he was too small to survive in a state prison.... http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news...f8-59fc17d195da Quote
Nocrap Posted May 29, 2006 Report Posted May 29, 2006 A judge's decision to sentence a 5-foot-1 man to probation instead of prison for sexually assaulting a child has angered crime victim advocates who say the punishment sends the wrong message.But supporters of short people say it's about time someone recognizes the unique challenges they face. District Judge Kristine Cecava of Cheyenne County Court issued the sentence last week. She told Richard Thompson that his crimes deserved a long prison sentence but that he was too small to survive in a state prison.... http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news...f8-59fc17d195da Oh my goodness. They've got to be kidding. When he committed the offense surely he must have realized that if caught he would be going to prison. I'm only 4'10", but would never expect or demand such consideration. I guess if you're tall enough to do the crime, you're tall enough do the time. What next? Quote
Guest Warwick Green Posted May 29, 2006 Report Posted May 29, 2006 Oh my goodness. They've got to be kidding.When he committed the offense surely he must have realized that if caught he would be going to prison. I'm only 4'10", but would never expect or demand such consideration. I guess if you're tall enough to do the crime, you're tall enough do the time. What next? We have heard groups claim they are disadvantaged and therefore are more susceptible to being dragged into a life of crime and should be treated leniently. But short people? And the argument that he will be treated badly in prison? Tough. Quote
geoffrey Posted May 30, 2006 Report Posted May 30, 2006 Oh my goodness. They've got to be kidding. When he committed the offense surely he must have realized that if caught he would be going to prison. I'm only 4'10", but would never expect or demand such consideration. I guess if you're tall enough to do the crime, you're tall enough do the time. What next? We have heard groups claim they are disadvantaged and therefore are more susceptible to being dragged into a life of crime and should be treated leniently. But short people? And the argument that he will be treated badly in prison? Tough. We have kept our criminal business people and fraud artists away from the violent criminals for some time, it wouldn't be unreasonable to put a 'short' person in a different situation so he doesn't get killed. None the less, he should be in jail. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Guest Warwick Green Posted May 30, 2006 Report Posted May 30, 2006 We have kept our criminal business people and fraud artists away from the violent criminals for some time, it wouldn't be unreasonable to put a 'short' person in a different situation so he doesn't get killed.None the less, he should be in jail. By all means put him in protective custody in prison. But less time because he is short - no way. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.