robosmith Posted March 14 Author Report Posted March 14 (edited) 33 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: What do they mean by "probationary"? In BC when you first start a job, even a union job, and you're within your probationary period, you can be let go basically without cause. All the employer has to do is say that you're not performing to their standards and that's that. The judge ruled that STANDARDS were NOT FOLLOWED. Well performing staff were ROUTINELY fired by LYING about their PERFORMANCE. Edited March 14 by robosmith Quote
Deluge Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 22 hours ago, impartialobserver said: Maybe. My guess is that the SC will say the same thing as myself.... follow existing law. You can get trim the number of employees while following the law. It takes a day or two longer but not all that difficult. I do not mind the idea of having less federal government employees but they should play by the rules that they themselves put into place. Interesting how you think that they should not follow existing law.. very interesting. Your approval of this reality is not necessary but if you follow existing law.. the employee can't sue you or be reinstated later. This makes it permanent. If you do not.. they can sue you, take you to court and be in the right according to existing law. Your guess is wrong. Karoline Leavitt sums it up below: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.