betsy Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 So, despite Martin and his ministers' insistence that Dingwall resigned (thereby he is entitled to the $400+ payed to him by the government, plus all his legal expenses) , it has now been reported that Dingwall was actually fired. If he was fired, is he still supposed to get that kind of pay-off? Quote
betsy Posted April 13, 2006 Author Report Posted April 13, 2006 Faced with this evidence that Paul Martin had lied repeatedly in saying that Dingwall resigned, the Liberal strategist glibly tried to deflect the criticism by switching to the classic slick mode Liberals are famous for. His reply was ..."well, you wanted him fired!" Quote
Spike22 Posted April 13, 2006 Report Posted April 13, 2006 I would have taken this to court if I was Harper after all what are we doing with all this high priced hired help? We are supposed to use it when the governement requires it. Remember this; all polititians are the same, on camera they rant and rave about how bad the other party is then go out socializing together. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.