Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's not that unusual though. Look at Winnipeg/Manitoba. That's not confusion; that's just the difference between country and city folk.

"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted

Hey I consider myself to be a lefty ( i support my NDP :) ) but I'm still appreciative of the fact Steven Harper wants to stick to his guns (artic sovreignty is part of his platform) Whether or not anything happens up there is highly debatable, but hey , good work for showing some balls Harper.

The real question here is if this is the right battle to fight. Do you want Artic sovreignty, or do you want trade disputes resolved? The US is not known for backing down on many issues, so Mr.Harper will have to pick his spots.

"To hear many religious people talk, one would think God created the torso, head, legs and arms but the devil slapped on the genitals.” -Don Schrader

Posted
Satire and you are barely passing aquaintances, hey? "Eating babies" has become a lexiconal way of saying someone is evil. Now, I happen to think Dick Cheney is quite possibly the evilest motherf**ker in North America, which places him high in the rankings worldwide. But i do not actually think he eats babies. But I digress.

The bit about eating babies being equated to being evil is new to me. Anyway, I'm not a Bush nor am I a Cheney fan, but I'd hardly call them evil. Out of sheer curiosity, on what do you base your intense hate for them? I think Bush will go down as one of the worst POTUS in a long long time, but evil? I think they are seriously misguided, but not evil.

"If in passing, you never encounter anything that offends you, you are not living in a free society."

- Rt. Hon. Kim Campbell -

“In many respects, the government needs fewer rules, but rules that are consistently applied.” - Sheila Fraser, Former Auditor General.

Posted
How does Canada defend claims over ocean which is further than 12 miles from its shores?

That would be like the USA claiming the Atlantic ocean all the way up to Bermuda or something.

It's the string of islands. Each island that's Canadian territory extends our territorial waters - to include the next island, which is Canadian territory, which then extends our territorial waters - to the next island. etc.,

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

How does Canada defend claims over ocean which is further than 12 miles from its shores?

That would be like the USA claiming the Atlantic ocean all the way up to Bermuda or something.

It's the string of islands. Each island that's Canadian territory extends our territorial waters - to include the next island, which is Canadian territory, which then extends our territorial waters - to the next island. etc.,

It's questionable, I don't know how much of that water is really ours to protect. That doesn't mean we don't need to protect the north though. The Denmarkians have already tried to conquer us via that route once. :lol:

RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game")

--

Posted

It's a little dodgy to claim all the water between two landmasses as yours though. . .

The other problem being that if Canada doesn't have the military power to keep those waterways clear of vessels they don't want there, then they lose their de-facto claim over them anyway. And only one country in this hemisphere has the ability to assist Canada in this task. . .

Posted
It's a little dodgy to claim all the water between two landmasses as yours though. . .

The other problem being that if Canada doesn't have the military power to keep those waterways clear of vessels they don't want there, then they lose their de-facto claim over them anyway. And only one country in this hemisphere has the ability to assist Canada in this task. . .

Greenland?????

"To hear many religious people talk, one would think God created the torso, head, legs and arms but the devil slapped on the genitals.” -Don Schrader

Posted
Hey I consider myself to be a lefty ( i support my NDP :) ) but I'm still appreciative of the fact Steven Harper wants to stick to his guns (artic sovreignty is part of his platform) Whether or not anything happens up there is highly debatable, but hey , good work for showing some balls Harper.

The real question here is if this is the right battle to fight. Do you want Artic sovreignty, or do you want trade disputes resolved? The US is not known for backing down on many issues, so Mr.Harper will have to pick his spots.

Well looky here! Already, Harper has a convert! His first day at work was not wasted.

The government should do something.

Posted
It's questionable, I don't know how much of that water is really ours to protect. That doesn't mean we don't need to protect the north though. The Denmarkians have already tried to conquer us via that route once. :lol:

What's questionable about it? Territorial waters extend 22kms from the shoreline from each island that is under the Canadian flag. When those islands are less than 44kms apart, all the water between them is Canadian territory, as Argus said.

Posted

It's questionable, I don't know how much of that water is really ours to protect. That doesn't mean we don't need to protect the north though. The Denmarkians have already tried to conquer us via that route once. :lol:

What's questionable about it? Territorial waters extend 22kms from the shoreline from each island that is under the Canadian flag. When those islands are less than 44kms apart, all the water between them is Canadian territory, as Argus said.

Thats true, but only if we assert soverignty over it. If you don't protect it, its not yours. So lets get some boats up there and start sinking things that float on by.

Or just big cannons like on that WWII movie, you know, where the commandos go and blow up the big cannons in Spain or something? Someone help me out here, I want to go rent this now and I don't remember what its called? :(

Either way, ships, cannons, whatever. Defend our water and people will respect it in a hurry. We need to start sinking those Portuguese fisherman that wander on over too. Sink one and they'll all stop in a hurry.

RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game")

--

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,900
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...