Wikipedia on the Liberals

[scribblet]

This is one reason not to trust wikpedia read it while you can

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=35428380

[geoffrey]

This is one reason not to trust wikpedia read it while you can

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=35428380

scriblett.. have you been up to no good?

It's a good humourous attack. They didn't damage the actual article so it is no big deal. Just fix the pic and first paragraph and all is good.

None the less I'm sure the Liberals here will be livid.

[I Miss Trudeau]

None the less I'm sure the Liberals here will be livid.

I guess I'm one of those "Liberals" thats find this sort of thing juvenile and pathetic, not amusing.

[geoffrey]

None the less I'm sure the Liberals here will be livid.

I guess I'm one of those "Liberals" thats find this sort of thing juvenile and pathetic, not amusing.

I Miss Trudeau, it was a joke. Have a good laugh, its been fixed already. Smile more!

[stignasty]

"As a result of recent vandalism, editing of this page by new or anonymous users is temporarily disabled. Changes can be discussed on the talk page, or you can request unprotection."

Of course if it was the conservative page that had been vandalized the clones would be crying bloody murder about those unscrupulous lib'ruls.

[geoffrey]

"As a result of recent vandalism, editing of this page by new or anonymous users is temporarily disabled. Changes can be discussed on the talk page, or you can request unprotection."

Of course if it was the conservative page that had been vandalized the clones would be crying bloody murder about those unscrupulous lib'ruls.

No way, I'd be laughing like none other, in fact I encourage such satire. It didn't hurt anyone.

[kimmy]

I once went to Wikipedia's "George W Bush" entry to look up a couple of things, and found a one-word entry: "Asshole."

I did think the Titanic photo was kind of amusing, but yes... also juvenile. I've also giggled lately at blogs that have been using a photo of the Hindenburg disaster to represent Paul Martin.

Would Conservatives be howling if the same was done to them? I offer a qualified answer. When Liberal-supporters have offered similar sorts of satire towards the Conservative party, we have seen them use swastikas and the little photoshopped cartoon of Harper as a marionette with Dubya holding the strings. Which I think is meaner in spirit than the use of the Titanic as an emblem of the Liberals' floundering campaign. Virtually everybody, Liberals included, concedes that the Liberals have struck a few icebergs during this campaign. Satire attempting to equate Conservatives to Nazis, or Harper to Bush's puppet are by nature a lot more controversial.

-k

[scribblet]

This is one reason not to trust wikpedia read it while you can

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=35428380

scriblett.. have you been up to no good?

It's a good humourous attack. They didn't damage the actual article so it is no big deal. Just fix the pic and first paragraph and all is good.

None the less I'm sure the Liberals here will be livid.

I wish... shows to go you though that wikipedia can't really be relied on, at least it shouldn't be your only source of info.l

[Canuck Monk]

Lol, that's funny.

Yeah, I looked up that Tucker Carlson guy after he made that comment about Canada and someone edited it and said he wore a bow tie that makes him look like a queer.