How will more gun laws make us safer?

[reason10]

Let's see some evidence. Gun grabbers, SHOW US how criminals will suddenly begin following the law, just because  you pass another law.

 

[Americana Antifa]

1 hour ago, reason10 said:

Let's see some evidence. Gun grabbers, SHOW US how criminals will suddenly begin following the law, just because  you pass another law.

 

This isn't an argument against gun control. This is an argument against all laws.

[reason10]

14 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

This isn't an argument against gun control. This is an argument against all laws.

It is an argument against attacking the United States Constitution just to appease a small bunch of left wing goose steppers.
 

Look at the FACTS:

There is no Constitutional right to commit rape, commit murder, commit a car jacking, commit a mass shooting at a public school, etc.

Our legal system is set up to capture and prosecute the animals who commit those crimes, and put them in cages when convicted so they can never harm the public.

There IS a Constitutional right to bear arms. And THAT is the price of living in a free society. A law abiding citizen has the RIGHT to own a gun, but he/she also has a responsibility to follow the law taking out the trash when he/she is threatened.

Criminals are not going to obey new (or old ) gun laws. Disarming law abiding citizens who only want to protect themselves is just plain stupid.

Edited March 7, 2023 by reason10

[Americana Antifa]

4 hours ago, reason10 said:

It is an argument against attacking the United States Constitution just to appease a small bunch of left wing goose steppers.

Your argument was that if guns were banned, people would still have guns because criminals don't follow laws.

[reason10]

Just now, Americana Antifa said:

Your argument was that if guns were banned, people would still have guns because criminals don't follow laws.

Nope. That statement is a LIE.

(Try to keep up with the rest of the class, son.)

1. My argument is new gun laws (which UNCONSTITUTIONALLY RESTRICT THE RIGHTS OF LEGAL GUN OWNERS) are ineffective because there is no such thing as a law abiding criminal. Right now, REASONABLE GUN LAWS, (no guns to felons, minors, illegal aliens, crazy people) are okay. New gun grabbing laws just assumes ALL gun owners are criminals. Only a MORE ON would think that.

2. The citizens of the United States have a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. That kinda makes a difference. It's like we can't ban ALL posting at political message boards just because extremist left wingers like you vomit all sorts of LIES everywhere you go. The Constitution is absolute.

[Americana Antifa]

8 minutes ago, reason10 said:

Nope. That statement is a LIE.

(Try to keep up with the rest of the class, son.)

1. My argument is new gun laws (which UNCONSTITUTIONALLY RESTRICT THE RIGHTS OF LEGAL GUN OWNERS) are ineffective because there is no such thing as a law abiding criminal. Right now, REASONABLE GUN LAWS, (no guns to felons, minors, illegal aliens, crazy people) are okay. New gun grabbing laws just assumes ALL gun owners are criminals. Only a MORE ON would think that.

2. The citizens of the United States have a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. That kinda makes a difference. It's like we can't ban ALL posting at political message boards just because extremist left wingers like you vomit all sorts of LIES everywhere you go. The Constitution is absolute.

You literally posted a meme said how murder is illegal, but felons commit murder anyway.

I'm very pro-gun myself, but your argument is ridiculously bad.

[reason10]

19 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

You literally posted a meme said how murder is illegal, but felons commit murder anyway.

I'm very pro-gun myself, but your argument is ridiculously bad.

Thing is, I'm very ANTI gun. I don't want to be around them. I don't want them in my house. But I'm very PRO CONSTITUTION. My meme was entirely correct. Disarming law abiding citizens will NOT make people safer. There is no such thing as a law abiding criminal.

And the ONLY think that will slow down murderers (other than building more prisons and doubling the size of police forces) will be ARMED future victims, who shoot to kill. Enough potential muggers, car jackers, home invaders, rapists, get shot and KILLED by a potential victim, the rest take a moment to reconsider their actions. And if they don't, they are killed in their next crime.

Bottom line, either the animals learn not to do something or they are taken OUT of the gene pool.

(Frankly, I'm all for doubling the number of prisons, courts and cops on the beat. But there are liberal governments who let the animals out with no bail and engage in giving MILLIONS of taxpayer dollars to NON slaves for slave reparations. So it's not like governments can be trusted to maintain public safety.)

[Americana Antifa]

1 hour ago, reason10 said:

There is no such thing as a law abiding criminal.

Again, this is not an argument against gun control, this is an argument against all laws. Why is breaking and entering illegal? Criminals don't abide by the law, anyway.

[reason10]

1 hour ago, Americana Antifa said:

Again, this is not an argument against gun control, this is an argument against all laws. Why is breaking and entering illegal? Criminals don't abide by the law, anyway.

No it is not. It is an argument against gun grabbing. 

Breaking and entering is not a CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEED RIGHT. And taking a shit on the CONSTITUTION just because some David Hogg retards need some attention is just plain asinine.