The_Rebirth Posted March 22, 2005 Report Posted March 22, 2005 With the recent senate election in Alberta, and the fact that Paul Martin will not be appointing any of the so called elected senators, do people care as much anymore? Or are systems like the STV(-bc) and systems like it going to be the push for the near future? Quote
kimmy Posted March 22, 2005 Report Posted March 22, 2005 Hello, I don't believe Senate Reform has ever been on the Liberals' agenda. While Paul Martin might have an academic interest in the subject, I think he'd sooner jab a fork into his own eyeball than attempt to pursue any kind of constitutional reform. In the case of Senate reform in particular, an "equal" senate would never fly amongst voters in his central-Canada power base. And an "elected" senate is contrary to his needs as a political leader. If he can't hand out senate seats as rewards to party hacks, then what can he use instead? -kimmy Quote (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
playfullfellow Posted March 22, 2005 Report Posted March 22, 2005 If he can't hand out senate seats as rewards to party hacks, then what can he use instead How about some autographed golf balls and a Canadian flag? Oppps, thats been tried before. Didn't work, but some people sure made some bucks out of that deal. Quote
The_Rebirth Posted March 22, 2005 Author Report Posted March 22, 2005 Hello,I don't believe Senate Reform has ever been on the Liberals' agenda. While Paul Martin might have an academic interest in the subject, I think he'd sooner jab a fork into his own eyeball than attempt to pursue any kind of constitutional reform. In the case of Senate reform in particular, an "equal" senate would never fly amongst voters in his central-Canada power base. And an "elected" senate is contrary to his needs as a political leader. If he can't hand out senate seats as rewards to party hacks, then what can he use instead? -kimmy I think that's a bit of red herring argument there Kimmy. If the people care enough about an issue, change can happen, however slow that might be. My question was not about cronyism, but rather about the political will of the nation. Quote
Newfie Canadian Posted March 22, 2005 Report Posted March 22, 2005 The Senate, as useless as it is, may never be an issue big enough for the electorate. There are too many everyday problems for us to try to get the politicians to deal with, most notably health care. Quote "If you don't believe your country should come before yourself, you can better serve your country by livin' someplace else." Stompin' Tom Connors
The Terrible Sweal Posted March 22, 2005 Report Posted March 22, 2005 Snate reform requires constitutional change, and there is insufficient political need and collectuve goodwill to attempt that journey right now. Quote
fellowtraveller Posted March 23, 2005 Report Posted March 23, 2005 My question was not about cronyism, but rather about the political will of the nation Same thing really. The political will of the nation is expressed through the Liberal Party, and elected wholesale by Ontario. Senate Reform is basically impossible, thanks to the wisdom of Trudeau. Making an effective Senate wll require a redistribution of power away from Central Canada, and that will never happen. It's a bitter and sick joke, nothing else. Our system of governance in this country is an anachronism, with the Senate as the first but not worst exhibit.. Quote The government should do something.
Guest eureka Posted March 24, 2005 Report Posted March 24, 2005 The same old ill-informed nonsense. Central Canada (Ontario) is the most under-represented region of the country in the Senate. I have been through this Senate idiocy so often,one would think at least some would have taken the trouble to inform themselves of the facts about the Senate before weeping again. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.