Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Mr Blair said: "Whatever the disagreements about the first conflict in Iraq to remove Saddam, in this conflict now taking place in Iraq, this is the crucible in which the future of this global terrorism will be determined. Either it will succeed and this terrorism will grow, or we will succeed, the Iraqi people will succeed and this global terrorism will be delivered a huge defeat.

"I do say to people in this new Iraqi conflict, whatever the disagreements about the removal of Saddam, there is only one side for sensible and reasonable people to be on. Now is not the time for the international community to divide or disagree but to come together behind what is happening in Iraq."

Independent

In fact, the current situation is far from a "war", or a quagmire, if you read blogs from Iraq. Only the CBC and so on have got the news wrong.

Posted

Dear August1991,

Mr. Blair is using the current tactic of 'dismiss the cause, what I did yesterday has no bearing on today'. Even if this were possible, is the present 'order of battle' feasable? Mr. Blair seems to be saying, "Even though we lied to you, misrepresented our motive, and bungled the job, that's no reason not to throw your support behind us stepping on the gas and continuing our present course".

In fact, the current situation is far from a "war"
Indeed, no formal declaration of war was declared. The US/UK try to play both sides of the fence, dodging the charges of 'illegal action' by refusing to declare war, while trying prisoners for 'war crimes'.

Besides, Iraq was never the 'crucible for terrorism', and both the US/UK and now Iraq both argue the right to use article 51 of the UN.

Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?

Posted

Dear August1991,

BAGHDAD, Iraq - The Iraqi prime minister insisted Sunday that the raging insurgency — which has claimed 300 lives in the last week alone and resulted in a wave of kidnappings — will not delay January elections, promising the vote will strike a "major blow" against the violent opposition.
This quote is from AP, I believe.

I fail to see how Mr. Blair and Mr. Bush can entertain the notion that 'elections' are going to be a major blow to those that have a different interpretation of 'law'.

Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...