Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Derek L
Posted

Clever bastards those anarchists, especially when they act together.

John Goodman in The Big Lebowski knew how to deal with anarchists. "We believe in NUSSINK!"

:lol:

Posted

To me it makes as much sense to riot here as it does at the G8/G20 ... NONE.

The government can't give anything to anyone without having first taken it from someone else.

Posted

What kills me though - and we can blame these people too - is that they had all these outdoor televisions located in the prime city real estate. What were they thinking?!?!

They were thinking that a bunch of legal adults ought to be able to get together to watch a civic event, in this case a hockey game, without there being a big problem.

Personally, I see it as another indication of the spoiled nature of today's younger people. Vancouver and its neighboring communities are probably the epicenter of self-worship in Canada, governed by politicians desperate to tell people whatever they want to know, and to be inclusive, affirmative, and supportive to anyone and everyone. They're not into the 'personal responsibility' thing out there. Whatever is wrong in your life is someone elses fault, not yours. So you take a bunch of adult babies, otherwise known as twentysomethings, who have never been held to task for much of anything, who don't have or like responsibility, who have been coddled all their lives, liquor them up, and then set them loose in the downtown without any adult supervision. What do you THINK would happen?

Personally, I don't think anyone under thirty should be allowed to drink... or vote. They're still ignorant, shiftless children.

It is an inverted moral calculus that tries to persuade the world to demonize one state that tries its civilized best to abide in a difficult time and place, and rides merrily by the examples and practices of dozens of states and leaderships that drop into brutality every day without a twinge of regret or a whisper of condemnation. - Rex Murphy

Posted

losing in game 7 on home ice in the Stanley cup final

their have been riots over far lesser things

And all started & participated in by IDIOTS

Posted

Personally, I don't think anyone under thirty should be allowed to drink... or vote. They're still ignorant, shiftless children.

I don't think you have the demographic quite right: we should not allow anyone under thirty, who is also a male, to drink.

There were very few "girls" breaking windows, lighting cars on a fire, and punching out other people.

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted (edited)

of course they were, at least half of them in the photos were wearing Canucks jerseys which cost $100 to $300 each.

Canucks fans are the worst in the NHL by a wide margin and have had that distinction for a long time.

And, one of nice things about those photos & videos is that they will be used in court to convict those thoughtless shits.

Now, will the courts make them pay restitution? That is the only fair way to handle this type of situation & if a few of these people are stuck with hundreds of thousands of dollars in court decreed debt it might deter a few other idiots from doing the same. or, being by nature idiots, perhaps not. Either way, these people will be plagued by debts till the debts are satisfied. Most of the damage will be paid for by insurance companies and there are few entities in the world as vindictive as insurance companies.

Edited by Tilter
Posted (edited)

Vancouvers riot was very similiar to the G20 but far more incited.

I have information I can't digress but there were multiple organized forces at work on all sides. It was a staged demonstration and instance of social engineering.

The police imo really messed up in firing the gas canisters, for multiple reasons.

1. Starting a stampede in a packed city street put people at grave risk.

2. They police could have advanced with a moving barrier.

3. Police should have started on both ends in clearing people not one -- providing people a means of moving.

4. Police should have offered a protective service for some for example free public transportation - example buses to take people out of the center. (and protected or the APC's they have...)

5. A 10 minute timespan was not sufficient. They needed to keep things calm instead they incited emotions.

IMO they wanted it to happen and the govt was involved in its development.

I think overall they are using it as a pawn peice.

IMO duress and mob rage should mitigate non criminality of the occurence.

The real risk is that the riot act was read and so anyone who was present is potentially subject to life imprisionment.

A really sad day for the administration, as many steps could have been taking to reduce harm.

It is difficult in these circumstances to know what really happened, and that is concerning.

And yes most definately cars and windows are a target so why wern't cars removed? And why wasn't a safety lane kept clear, and why wern't the barriers put infront of windows and locked together. Instead you have barriers that can be used to crush bystandards or police in the event of a human stampede.

The situation was grossly engineered and desired imo.

Of course we hear next to nothing about injuries or arrests.. it is black out more or less.

100 people atleast were arrested if they get real jail time (rioting holds a potential life sentence if the riot act is read which it was) then that is atleat 5 million dollars a year for those 100 people.

Also the jail time = the whole facebook reporting phenomenon is aother social engineering spur getting people to narc on people.

Fact is that photos can be photoshoped so to can videos.

It is a quagmire of policing that was water thrown down by the administrators.

Two other points.

1. What happened to all the security city spending from the olympics.. still ineffective to prevent a mass riot?

2. Why let schools out early.

Many little why'd that happen contexts are at play and it is clear that this was a broad attempt at potential civil risk.

If a riot was likely then why wasn't the reserve called up? Was it, what side were they on?

It is absolute idiocy. I stayed up and watched the game cause I was currious on the riot news.. and sure enough.

Edited by William Ashley

I was here.

Posted

I don't think you have the demographic quite right: we should not allow anyone under thirty, who is also a male, to drink.

There were very few "girls" breaking windows, lighting cars on a fire, and punching out other people.

ok... i'm 24 and i take offense to be compared to those idiots

Posted

ok... i'm 24 and i take offense to be compared to those idiots

I wasn't being clear enough in my sarcasm.

As for being compared to these "idiots" well, I don't think you and me are so much different than some of them: The sad, painful truth about the Vancouver rioters’ true identities

The picture of a young man attempting to set a police cruiser on fire by lighting a rag stuffed in its gas tank has received widespread Internet attention. He’s been identified as an academic all-star who was supposed to be heading to the U.S. in fall on a water polo scholarship.

Water Polo Canada announced Friday that the 17-year-old has been suspended as a member of the junior men’s national team. He has apparently turned himself into police, although the Vancouver Police Department refused to confirm this.

Ok, granted I never did get a water polo scholarship, but I got scholarships nevertheless. :P

If a believer demands that I, as a non-believer, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy. Flemming Rose (Dutch journalist)

My biggest takeaway from economics is that the past wasn't as good as you remember, the present isn't as bad as you think, and the future will be better than you anticipate. Morgan Housel http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/01/14/things-im-pretty-sure-about.aspx

Posted

Vancouvers riot was very similiar to the G20 but far more incited.

I have information I can't digress but there were multiple organized forces at work on all sides. It was a staged demonstration and instance of social engineering.

The police imo really messed up in firing the gas canisters, for multiple reasons.

1. Starting a stampede in a packed city street put people at grave risk.

2. They police could have advanced with a moving barrier.

3. Police should have started on both ends in clearing people not one -- providing people a means of moving.

4. Police should have offered a protective service for some for example free public transportation - example buses to take people out of the center. (and protected or the APC's they have...)

5. A 10 minute timespan was not sufficient. They needed to keep things calm instead they incited emotions.

IMO they wanted it to happen and the govt was involved in its development.

I think overall they are using it as a pawn peice.

IMO duress and mob rage should mitigate non criminality of the occurence.

The real risk is that the riot act was read and so anyone who was present is potentially subject to life imprisionment.

A really sad day for the administration, as many steps could have been taking to reduce harm.

It is difficult in these circumstances to know what really happened, and that is concerning.

And yes most definately cars and windows are a target so why wern't cars removed? And why wasn't a safety lane kept clear, and why wern't the barriers put infront of windows and locked together. Instead you have barriers that can be used to crush bystandards or police in the event of a human stampede.

The situation was grossly engineered and desired imo.

Of course we hear next to nothing about injuries or arrests.. it is black out more or less.

100 people atleast were arrested if they get real jail time (rioting holds a potential life sentence if the riot act is read which it was) then that is atleat 5 million dollars a year for those 100 people.

Also the jail time = the whole facebook reporting phenomenon is aother social engineering spur getting people to narc on people.

Fact is that photos can be photoshoped so to can videos.

It is a quagmire of policing that was water thrown down by the administrators.

Two other points.

1. What happened to all the security city spending from the olympics.. still ineffective to prevent a mass riot?

2. Why let schools out early.

Many little why'd that happen contexts are at play and it is clear that this was a broad attempt at potential civil risk.

If a riot was likely then why wasn't the reserve called up? Was it, what side were they on?

It is absolute idiocy. I stayed up and watched the game cause I was currious on the riot news.. and sure enough.

According to this wordy rant the problem was precipitated by the police force, engineered by faulty city thinking & federal failure in not calling out the Army. I guess you think it's OK for our youth to riot as long as the cops fire teargas, the city fails to provide an force of police to protect businesses and the Army stays out of it. --- asinine thinking on your part or the part of anyone else who agrees . If the police use tasers---- too much force--- rubber bullets --- the same argument--- How about all major cities buying a group of water cannons--- would that please your sensitive feelings?

The blame for the riots are in one corner only and it is that of the morons who rioted. No one else is to blame no matter how anyone tries to excuse them

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...