fellowtraveller Posted August 26, 2010 Report Posted August 26, 2010 Well, firstly, this is all based on assumptions. Secondly, when did I ever say that these people were negotiating on behalf of a corporation? I said they were mediators, which by definition have to be in the middle of the negotiation between said lawyers. So really, is it me who should try again? Because the only negotiations that matter are between corporations or governments, and neither will cede their authority or interests to a mediator. Of course. And that is not an assumption. The only other possibility is mediation between individuals, and that mainly involves family law or minor civil disputes. I am sure the legal community would welcome the creation of another layer of billable hours between them and an adversary. Oh, the current layer between lawyers, the 'middle' is called the judicial system. The reason it is thyere is because their 'mediation' is binding. Anything non binding is a wank. Try again. Quote The government should do something.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.