Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, firstly, this is all based on assumptions. Secondly, when did I ever say that these people were negotiating on behalf of a corporation? I said they were mediators, which by definition have to be in the middle of the negotiation between said lawyers. So really, is it me who should try again?

Because the only negotiations that matter are between corporations or governments, and neither will cede their authority or interests to a mediator. Of course. And that is not an assumption.

The only other possibility is mediation between individuals, and that mainly involves family law or minor civil disputes.

I am sure the legal community would welcome the creation of another layer of billable hours between them and an adversary. Oh, the current layer between lawyers, the 'middle' is called the judicial system. The reason it is thyere is because their 'mediation' is binding. Anything non binding is a wank.

Try again.

The government should do something.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,928
    • Most Online
      1,878

    Newest Member
    BTDT
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...