More bad news for the Liberals

[Kliege]

**Post Removed Due to Copyright Infringment.**

For those who are new to these forums, please read over the rules and guidelines before posting.

Posting Copyrighted Material

Copyright infringement is illegal on these forums.  Therefore, please do not post articles in their entirety.  When posting copyrighted material, please use the quote (

&

) feature to highlight the important parts of the article and provide a thorough summary for others. You must also provide sufficient credit to the author and a link to the original article in your post. If the article cannot be found online, then at the end of the post provide an appropriate cite using any of the available citing formats, MLA, APA, etc.

Edited May 31, 2004 by Greg

[takeanumber]

My main question I suppoe would be this:

The Liberal war cabinet is seeing all this...and yet they really don't seem to be adapting or adjusting to the situation.

It really does have a 1993 feeling out there.

[Dennis]

This is a continuation of a trend with Team Martin. Since the "I'm Mad as Hell" speech when scandal first broke out, they have been running on empty ever since.

And, as a result, their campaign is running on the theme, "We're Liberal, that's why you should vote for us"

Canadian voters aren't stupid. They can smell a desperate party and a desperate politician from a mile away.

That's what Team Martin has been for months now. The trend continues.

[Dennis]

And I guess the crux of the problem for Martin has been that the hype surrounding him as a leadership hopeful has been stamped out by the reality that he's just NOT the guy he and his team have said he his for the past ten years.

If Paul Martin had any of the promise we were all told he had, he would not have been swamped by scandal.

As it is, an empty and disappointing politician, leading a spoiled party after a decade of increasingly corrupting rule, is not a recipe for electoral success.

I'm not sure if anything can change that reality right now. We'll see.