Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I can't speak for the other guy, but I was busy having a life. Something you may want to consider.

Not one of my "flock" and besides, he had his own lawyers to defend him.

Do you mean like the Magna Carta or something?

I thought for sure you'd be here telling us how the white man made him do it. Seems to be your answer to everything else that ails the red man.

I've been wrong before, once.

"You are scum for insinuating that isn't the case you snake." -William Ashley

Canadian Immigration Reform Blog

Guest American Woman
Posted

The problem with Ahenakew is that he made his comments while in a position of power and influence which could be seen as an incitant. It was right to charge him and send him through the system to sort it out.

I agree that it was right to charge/try him. I had to read what he said, as well as the law, a few times in order to understand why what he said wasn't considered "hate speech" under the law.

Posted

I agree that it was right to charge/try him. I had to read what he said, as well as the law, a few times in order to understand why what he said wasn't considered "hate speech" under the law.

I'm a member of the alleged "victim group" of Ahenekaw's rantings. I do not think it was O.K. to charge him with anything other than gross stupidity.

  • Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone."
  • Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds.
  • Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location?
  • The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).

Posted

I agree that it was right to charge/try him. I had to read what he said, as well as the law, a few times in order to understand why what he said wasn't considered "hate speech" under the law.

It's hard for me to approve of charging a man for speaking, even when the words are ugly and evil, and yet feel that I live in a free society. I find the idea of hate speech laws to be an anathema in any society where free speech is a valued liberty. He was a hateful old man, which seems to me to be a much greater punishment than anything the judiciary could level at him.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,019
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    emmabrown
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...