Oleg Bach Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Question - is it unethical to hire people of limited intelligence and character to prime governmental positions? Medical isytopes are now SEXY ---- and granting of very lucrative contracts in the medical industry is done without tender? Worst of all the people appointed to care for us and others world wide who need treatment and good diagnostics - are as shallow as a warm and infested wading pool in August...what's next ? Do we hire the worst and get rid of ALL the best ----------It is a known fact that within the corporate world and now within our corporated cultured government - they do not want the best - they want controlable mediorcre individuals.... This is not a partizan issue - Harper has surrounded himself with idots so has the oppostion..we have a managerial dilema here and it is NOT sexy. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 9, 2009 Author Report Posted June 9, 2009 A L L S O : It is immoral to allow those of limited brain power to rule - it is an abuse of the public - for instance if a person does not understand the meaning of "minister" - that it means servant - or that Prime Minister - means "first servant" _ if you don't have those dirt poor and basic concept down - then you are not a servant - but a parasite pretending to serve - that's when the rat poison should come out in the form of an election that will disqualify any and all dishonourable members that expect the public to serve them...If it means the dismantling of all parties and having one GOOD and functional party _ so be it! Quote
Sir Bandelot Posted June 9, 2009 Report Posted June 9, 2009 Yeah but she is kinda good looking, right? So lets give her a job, we like to have beautiful people around us... Thats the sham of democracy- good looking people get elected by hordes of mindless media thralls. Quote
Radsickle Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 This Rat only won the Halton riding because Garth Turner was too honest to be the conservative MP for Halton. He went independent and wasn't able to fund a winning campaign. The Harper Thugs easily parachuted this former Toronto Port Authority Biatch into the riding even though she probably knows diddly squat about the region. If Halton wasn't getting stuffed and ruined with overpriced sprawl, it might've paid more attention to its recent MP. To me, Lisa's attitude is just another glimpse into the hollowness of Harper's politics. Quote
Sir Bandelot Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 What we have here, as her comments clearly prove is a gang of opportunists. They do not work in the public service to actually serve the people, but use any situation to further their own careers and personal power. They have absolutely no decency, as can be heard in the coarseness of their utterings, and snarls on their faces when confronted by it. Shame on them, and any of you who are still fooled. And same goes for Ignatieff. Same goes for Layton. Theres nothing more disgusting than a politician seeking the favor of the public, playing Mr. Goodbar, until they actually do get in office. If it looks like sh*t and smells like sh*t, you can guess what it is. Damn them Quote
Radsickle Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 What we have here, as her comments clearly prove is a gang of opportunists. They do not work in the public service to actually serve the people, but use any situation to further their own careers and personal power.They have absolutely no decency, as can be heard in the coarseness of their utterings, and snarls on their faces when confronted by it. Shame on them, and any of you who are still fooled. And same goes for Ignatieff. Same goes for Layton. Theres nothing more disgusting than a politician seeking the favor of the public, playing Mr. Goodbar, until they actually do get in office. If it looks like sh*t and smells like sh*t, you can guess what it is. Damn them If your scope has no definition, if you're jumping on the slow-moving, `all politicians are bad' bandwagon, then I've no time for you. Your snarl is more rabid than the politicians you despise. Be as cynical as you want about politicians in general, most people too lazy to vote often excuse themselves that way, but this forum topic is about a Conservative Rat caring more about how this invented `crisis' will benefit their popularity than about how many people Harper may have put in danger by ignoring a public servant's early warnings about Chalk River in 2008. He didn't just ignore those warnings, he stifled them... hoping to use the facility as a launching pad to privatize Canadian Nuclear Knowledge. Quote
Sir Bandelot Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 (edited) My scope has a very clear definition- the criminals who are in our government. When I say they are opportunists, I am talking about Raitt. When I say they have no decency, I'm talking about Bairds profanity. But in no way do I have faith in any of the others. Yes, I have been disillusioned. You can go on voting as is your choice, but if you think theres an alternative, I say you've been fooled again. Edited June 10, 2009 by Sir Bandelot Quote
Radsickle Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 (edited) Yes, I have been disillusioned. You can go on voting as is your choice, but if you think theres an alternative, I say you've been fooled again. So your solution is not to vote? Harper likes you. Fascism thrives on apathy. Edited June 10, 2009 by Radsickle Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 10, 2009 Author Report Posted June 10, 2009 So your solution is not to vote? Harper likes you.Fascism thrives on apathy. It's not apathetic to hold immature shallow jerks in utter contempt..it's actually pro active - and it's not a case of voting or not voting - it's a case of letting them hear your voice and breaking the arrogant prick's confidence. Politics is supposed to be a public service - first you have these wanna be Bolly Wood movie stars like what's her name - getting into public office cos's she loves her self a little to much - and now you have the Isytope lady...acting like she just got home from a night of pot smoking after a Madonna concert - who describes serious matters as sexy ---where are the real people? It's distressing to know that the shallowest and most superfical now sit in seats of power..wtf! Quote
Sir Bandelot Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 So your solution is not to vote? Harper likes you. So you would rather vote for one of the others, the very same ones who just gave themselves the right to take money, without accountability, in secret meetings... because they know that the public would be against it. We can see under what circumstances they are willing to agree with each other- when it comes to ripping us off. You can believe in them, if it makes you feel good. I do not have such "faith" in these rich peoples kids. Nor will I put my name behind them, they are liars one and all. I'll tell you what the bigger joke is- arguing about some twits comments, while the bigger issues, theft right from our pockets in billion dollar bailouts, meetings behind closed doors- go unnoticed, without criticism. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 10, 2009 Author Report Posted June 10, 2009 I heard this woman giving a formal apology for being SEXY --- she wept and was short of breath - talked about her dying father - (all fathers eventually die) -she spoke with great EMOTION - about her brother who died of cancer....and she said she was sorry for being a shallow twit......I don't give a damn about emotion - I want results with ministers in the camp of the oppostion and the ruling party.....using emotion to manipulate the Canadian public added insult to injury --- Her apology amounted to a con artist that weeps when caught...I knew this tough guy - an international mover and shaker - a kid brought crack cocaine into his household and the old guy caught him...he confronted the kid - the kid fell to his knees and wept...and denied any wrong doing....I asked the old tough guy what he thought and he said "Soon as he started to cry - I knew he was lieing" She should step down - she does not have the depth of character that is needed to proceed - perhaps she can return in ten years after she has matured. Quote
Sir Bandelot Posted June 10, 2009 Report Posted June 10, 2009 (edited) I did not see her performance but I saw a picture of her frowning sadly on the Yahoo news site. So she turned on the tears, eh... how pathetic can you get? Bad girl! Time to cry, then we'll all feel sorry for you. Man, Harper must think that the Canadian public is real stupid. I bet he's laughing his ass off right now. Chances are, he's right Edited June 10, 2009 by Sir Bandelot Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 10, 2009 Author Report Posted June 10, 2009 I did not see her performance but I saw a picture of her frowning sadly on the Yahoo news site. So she turned on the tears, eh... how pathetic can you get? Bad girl! Time to cry, then we'll all feel sorry for you.Man, Harper must think that the Canadian public is real stupid. I bet he's laughing his ass off right now. Chances are, he's right You get it and I get it but average joe is a sucker for tears...The core of this misadventure should be the neglect of the Calk river facility - I believe they might be letting the place rust out so they can get their friends in there and "Privatize" something so a few can benefit at the suffering of millions - it makes me sick...You have a federal government - with all finacial and human resourse and expertise at their disposal and they can not fix the holes in a tin can nuclear facility? Buy a new can for gods sake - and stop using these overly ambtious political dupes. Quote
Radsickle Posted June 11, 2009 Report Posted June 11, 2009 So you would rather vote for one of the others, the very same ones who just gave themselves the right to take money, without accountability, in secret meetings... because they know that the public would be against it. We can see under what circumstances they are willing to agree with each other- when it comes to ripping us off. You can believe in them, if it makes you feel good. I do not have such "faith" in these rich peoples kids. Nor will I put my name behind them, they are liars one and all. Do you also think the recent Premier of Nova Scotia is a rich person's kid? I find that the left lies less. I'll tell you what the bigger joke is- arguing about some twits comments, while the bigger issues, theft right from our pockets in billion dollar bailouts, meetings behind closed doors- go unnoticed, without criticism. Quote
Oleg Bach Posted June 11, 2009 Author Report Posted June 11, 2009 It's not an issue of left or right or who's from a wealthy family and who is not- It's about qualifications - character - level of awareness -social - political and above all spiritual....The woman in question simply strikes me as an underdeveloped entity - someone who has not paid their dues and is way back in some time warp that reminds one of a bad B movie -------------where the young female executive is charting out a course to the top through intrigue and conspiracy - as if life was some silly game - THIS IS NOT A MOVIE...it's real life and politics is not a glamour industry - she should go to Hollywood and play the part....politics desperately needs solid down to earth serious people - not flaking cut throat opportunists who use the language of modernity - and words like SEXY ---To decribe something that has nothing to do with sex...perhaps this minister....believes in old type feminism out of the 70s and pictures her self as a sexy political like that self centred Ruby Dali - that should be also removed from political life. Ruby is to involved with being rich and sexy to be of use...and so is her counterpart - the Isytope lady. Quote
the janitor Posted June 15, 2009 Report Posted June 15, 2009 Whether she said the crisis is sexy or not has nothing to do with the actual reality of the situation or the response of the government to it. Regardless of political stripe, politicians work hard, Conservatives, Liberals, New Democrats, Bloc, Republicans, Democrats. I'm sure all of them at one time or another have made flippant remarks. I don't take it as an indication of their commitment to public service. I think most of the time politicians get a bad rap just because there are often no easy answers to political problems. In the case of Raitt, I'd be willing to give her the benefit of the doubt because she's attractive. Same with Rona Ambrose or Sarah Palin. It's not like I agree with their politics, I just prefer attactive politicians. Sure, it makes me a chauvanist, but hey, I've got bigger faults than that. OINK! Quote
GostHacked Posted June 15, 2009 Report Posted June 15, 2009 Yeah but she is kinda good looking, right? So lets give her a job, we like to have beautiful people around us...Thats the sham of democracy- good looking people get elected by hordes of mindless media thralls. I have always said that image means nothing without substance. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.