shelphs Posted September 21, 2008 Report Posted September 21, 2008 Please read and view the cited sources before dismissing the video. Everything contained therein is accurate, and please confirm this for yourself. After you have verified the truthfulness of my argument, please tell others, please tell others of the video. Comments? Quote
Murray B. Posted September 21, 2008 Report Posted September 21, 2008 Comments? Al Gore is a politician and not a climatologist. David Suzuki is a Biologist and not a Climatologist ( a branch of Physics). He often uses his TV star status and media access to promote fashionable causes. Perhaps his being interred during WWII has contributed to this. I'm a 'computer guy' and a practical environmentalist and want nothing to do with these lunatic fringe environmentalists that have never been accountable for the economic damage they cause. The LFE caused two recessions in the seventies and eighties and are responsible for most of the warming measured in the last half of the twentieth century. What they don't tell you is that emissions legislation of the sixties resulted in cars that burned twice as much fuel. Almost any car of the mid-seventies burned twice as much fuel as a similar model from the mid-sixties. This affected many millions of vehicles and squandered many millions of barrels of oil to heat the air. The dramatic increase in consumption caused gas prices to increase exponentially at least 18 months before OPEC did anything. When will the LFE pay for the significant harm that they have brought to millions of North Americans? P.S. There was an environmental Professor where I used to work that I like to refer to as "Cadillac Carl". He had a nice Sedan de Ville, giant GMC SUV, and a Harley Davidson. Apparently he was completely dedicated to "saving the environment" or, at least, making others do so. Is Al Gore's mansion really required to house his small family and couldn't Mr. Suzuki get by with just one house? I seem to manage with a small house, small car, cordless mower, set back thermostat, and etcetera. Quote
Who's Doing What? Posted September 21, 2008 Report Posted September 21, 2008 Actually if you want to really get into this you need to look into Global Dimming and how it relates to Global warming. There was a recent program on PBS that I watched. Fascinating conclusion. Quote Harper differed with his party on some key policy issues; in 1995, for example, he was one of only two Reform MPs to vote in favour of federal legislation requiring owners to register their guns. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/election/bio/harper.html "You've got to remember that west of Winnipeg the ridings the Liberals hold are dominated by people who are either recent Asian immigrants or recent migrants from eastern Canada: people who live in ghettoes and who are not integrated into western Canadian society." (Stephen Harper, Report Newsmagazine, January 22, 2001)
Bryan Posted September 21, 2008 Report Posted September 21, 2008 Gore and Suzuki are both idiots. Intensity is the only thing you can control directly. How do they propose to stop total usage, population control? What's next? Are they going to complain that we aren't doing enough to control the output of the sun? Quote
capricorn Posted September 21, 2008 Report Posted September 21, 2008 On Goldhawk live a woman called and said: "The Conservatives are not doing anything to stop global warming". Boy talk about high expectations. Quote "We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers
betsy Posted September 22, 2008 Report Posted September 22, 2008 (edited) And another woman called GoldHawk to say that the Liberals and Green plans will pay for the beaurocrats that will handle all these plans....and that whatever revenue left to actually put into research will be of insignificant amount. I agree. And when Liberal MP McCallum bragged about having the approval of Suzuki, Al Gore and other environmentalist groups....Conservative MP Poillievre pointed out that those are the same people whom the Liberals will be doling out the money to. I tend to believe that. These groups know where their bread is buttered. Since you're talking of ethics, well there is something grossly unethical about being in bed with special interest groups just so to ensure political support. Edited September 22, 2008 by betsy Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.