Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A major hurdle companies face when deciding to go public in order to raise capital to expand is the myriad regulatory bodies they must comply with. Given that 99% of the provincial regulatros mirror the Ontario rules the exraneous provincial bodies are simply redundant, offer no new protection to shareholders or issuers and impede economic growth.

OTTAWA — Finance Minister Jim Flaherty Thursday appointed an “expert panel” to probe securities regulation in Canada, the latest move on the issue of a common regulator.

“I am asking the panel to develop a model common securities act to create a Canadian advantage in global capital markets,” Mr. Flaherty said

http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/st...y/robNews/home/

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted

There is two sides to this one Dancer. All provinces except for Ontario agreed to have the same rules and recognize each other's decisions. It's Ontario that won't let go, not the rest of the provinces. The other 12 have agreed with this already.

Why won't Ontario go along? Because they want the power. Not that it's much real power anyways.

RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game")

--

Posted
There is two sides to this one Dancer. All provinces except for Ontario agreed to have the same rules and recognize each other's decisions. It's Ontario that won't let go, not the rest of the provinces. The other 12 have agreed with this already.

Why won't Ontario go along? Because they want the power. Not that it's much real power anyways.

They way I see it it doesn't matter which provincial regulator is the monkeywrench...therevshould be one federal regulator....(located in toronto)

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Posted
They way I see it it doesn't matter which provincial regulator is the monkeywrench...therevshould be one federal regulator....(located in toronto)

agreed. We also need to emulate the BC Alberta free trade/labour agreement and have it emplemented in all provinces.

Those Dern Rednecks done outfoxed the left wing again.

~blueblood~

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Both these topics, a common securities regulator and a national free trade agreement, relate to the broader issue of the economic union, something which has been forgotten by politicians for too long. It is encouraging that the Conservative government is now looking into strengthening the economic union. I agree that something along the lines of the TILMA (the trade agreement between British Columbia and Alberta) should be developed for all of Canada and implemented by the federal government. Isn't that the nature of an economic union? And a single Canadian securities regulator is something that is long overdue and necessary for Canada's economic progress.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...