Radical Islamists, or Moderate Islamic victims?

[Guest American Woman]

Comparing Muslims to a dog? Talking about "owners?" It's a horrible analogy.

[cybercoma]

Very well said, also very true.

There's not a chance of discussing any religion's history of violence. It's something all religions are quite unwilling to admit.

[jbg]

I suspose 3000 people slaughtered using aircrafts as weapons isn't really an issue anymore, well until it happens again. Then it's to late to question this kind of behavior, kinda what they're hoping for

Well you could always get a UN resolution (if not vetoed by France).

[jbg]

Comparing Muslims to a dog? Talking about "owners?" It's a horrible analogy.

Obviously you missed the point. The point that I was making was that this Doberman learned that most people were terrified of him, and he took maximum advantage of that. The point is that Muslims don't have "owners" to tell people that it's a prank.

[RedDaVinci]

It's a common tactic among social activists...continue pushing the envelope and then retreating to a safe position and hurl abuse from behind it.

I encourage you to start a thread about this. If you feel so sure about this, then an argument that does more to prove this is a common tactic would be informative for the rest of us.

Comparing Muslims to a dog? Talking about "owners?" It's a horrible analogy.

It's a bad analogy in that that it compares Muslims to dogs without owners, but a good analogy in that it makes sense. That being said, it could have been better, but was fine.

[Moxie]

Obviously you missed the point. The point that I was making was that this Doberman learned that most people were terrified of him, and he took maximum advantage of that. The point is that Muslims don't have "owners" to tell people that it's a prank.

These men were mocking the passenger using bizarre behavior, there is no excuse for their behavior. I have no problem with your dog analogy, infact my dog is better behaved then these nasty bullies. If we tolerate this kind of behavior it shall grow as it has in England and Germany and Belgium, Sweden, you get the picture. Beware of the term "Reasonable Accomadation" jbg it means bend over Sharia Law is coming to a town or city near you. Of course supported by the loony leftards, in fact they coined the phrase "Reasonable Accomadation" "Multiculturalism" "Diversity" all those words coined to cower the public into thinking ethnic enclaves and race based communities is progression.

[Guest American Woman]

Obviously you missed the point. The point that I was making was that this Doberman learned that most people were terrified of him, and he took maximum advantage of that. The point is that Muslims don't have "owners" to tell people that it's a prank.

I didn't miss the point at all. It was a horrible analogy.

It's a bad analogy in that that it compares Muslims to dogs without owners, but a good analogy in that it makes sense. That being said, it could have been better, but was fine.

You've sure changed your tune.

Edited November 11, 2007 by American Woman

[jbg]

I encourage you to start a thread about this. If you feel so sure about this, then an argument that does more to prove this is a common tactic would be informative for the rest of us.

It's a bad analogy in that that it compares Muslims to dogs without owners, but a good analogy in that it makes sense. That being said, it could have been better, but was fine.

Thanks. I think I explained it two three posts up from this one. Edited November 12, 2007 by jbg

[jbg]

Beware of the term "Reasonable Accomadation" jbg it means bend over Sharia Law is coming to a town or city near you. Of course supported by the loony leftards, in fact they coined the phrase "Reasonable Accomadation" "Multiculturalism" "Diversity" all those words coined to cower the public into thinking ethnic enclaves and race based communities is progression.

Under US law "reasonable accomodation" is what's given a handicapped person so they can function in a school or job. It does not have the leftist baggage it does in Canada.

[jefferiah]

There's not a chance of discussing any religion's history of violence. It's something all religions are quite unwilling to admit.

Hmmm...well if you mean something like the Crusades...they were not sanctioned by the New Testament, so perhaps things like this are the history of man's violence rather than religion. You make it sound as if religion were a person, Cybercoma.