ron Young
-
Posts
102 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by ron Young
-
-
3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:
I would say it's the sign of a communist. After all Leon Trotsky founded communism based on the attempt to introduce insanity, and Pierre Trudeau added multiculturalism because he knew it would destroy Canada
Really? You really believe that? Multi culturalism is destroying Canada? And that Pierre Trudeau was the architect?
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:
the Canadian flag was changed by the Liberals
the German flag was changed by the Nazi's
one was changed to the maple leaf, the other was changed to a swastika
totally sane
Edited for posterity only of course.
No integrity at all. Its kewl and all I knew what I was in for going in.
-
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
merely pointing out that your definition of crazy can be quite profitable apparently, hasn't crimped my lifestyle
once you understand how Canada really works, you can make a lot of money by those means
Jeebus if money is what it's all about then by your own admission you got it all figured out sparky lol. How about the Canadian flag? Has that crimped your lifestyle?
-
Just now, Yzermandius19 said:
the Canadian flag was changed by the Liberals
the German flag was changed by the Nazi's
totally sane
The swastika is not the German flag.
The Canadian flag represents Canada around the world. Go show a German a Canadian Flag and swastika see if they feel they are the same.
-
13 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:
saying an argument is crazy
with no explanation as to why it is crazy
is a clear sign of cognitive dissonance
you may want to address that
So let's unpack this shall we.
Stating the cdn flag is just like the swastika seems totally sane to you?
Stating the liberal party is building a reich seems perfectly lucid to you? Mind you the definition of reich is readily available.
Shall we continue?
-
1 minute ago, Yzermandius19 said:
fook the average Canadian
and the horse they rode in on
Yes and then turn around and expect people to take you seriously lol. You folks slay me.
-
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:
decorated veteran, multimillionaire land owner, happily married for twenty one years and counting
this craziness has clearly served me well, God my vindicator it
Sure thing man cause we all know.
millionaires Love telling people they are millionaires lol. When did money start paying for integrity and credability?
-
8 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:
it's no skin off my teeth, knock yourself out
if God save the Queen is madness, then I am a madman therein, crazy for Elizabeth Windsor is no vice
When was the last time any average Canadian ever sang god save the queen? It was about 1973 I think and I heard my slow uncle sang it after some event or another.
-
21 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
How many posts full of childish insults & devoid of facts does a person get to put up here before they get banned?
There’s someone posting in this thread who will be at 100 posts soon, and whose net contribution to MLW could be matched by a belligerent toddler.
Seriously, his posts are a string of ad hominem attacks which provide literally no value whatsoever to either side of the equation.
I get it. He’s a Trudeau fanboy who’s desperate to put an end to this topic and he has no leg to stand on, plus he has his freedom of speech, but the forum guidelines don’t give him leeway to just keep on posting childish insults and nothing else. Can we make the call on this guy now?
Whaaaaaaaa. Snowflake. I've already told you I don't like the man personally. He's an arrogant asshat. What he isn't is the rest of the horse shit you maniacs assign to him. Every childish isnsult ever handed by me to any member on this forum is a direct response to a childish insult from said member. If you can't take the heat stay out of the furnace room. You only want me banned because I represent a threat to the status quo on this forum. Furthermore I believe some honest reflection might be in order for those seeking to ban a fellow Canadian. Guess that's just might be the differance between myself and " others" I don't give a rats arsehole what you say about me just as long as you are prepared to recieve the same back.
-
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:
Yes, this is the most significant initiative of the Nazi's, therefore...
You need to learn about the ignore feature.
Soon you will appreciate that the dearth of lucid conservatives means that they have no future.
Is it wrong to look for validation of ones own sanity in the insanity of others?
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Dougie93 said:
ah, in defence of the Liberal Party of Canada you invoke two Communist paradigms
one is to label dissidents as being crazy, the other is to call for their sterilization
how East German of you
I'm not defending anyone or anything. Mereley pointing out that your cray cray theories are bunk.
Sure ok in your world hoping someone doesn't have kids and pass on the crazy is the same as mass sterilization. Somewhere in between terminals in your head, is a missing connector or wire. You may want to address that.
-
16 hours ago, Dougie93 said:
but again, the majority of Canadians, certainly the younger generation, are totally Americanized
they think Canada is a republic, they have no concept of how the Confederation actually works
the Liberal Party of Canada Maple Leaf flag is like the Swastika
the Liberal Party of Woke Canada anthem is like the Horst Wessel song
like the Nazis, the Liberals are erasing Canadian history and replacing it with their own Reich
this is a tried and true method of totalitarians
a people without a history are easy to control
You sir may just be certifiable. Nothing you wrote is even based in reality. We can all only hope you haven't procreated and are passing on this drivel to unsuspecting children.
-
10 hours ago, Army Guy said:
what was that chirp, chirp, chirpy chirp chirp...sounds like a liberal , smells like a liberal, Has got to be a liberal. Ya call your ex beg him to take you back.
Surely that will help win the day. Start attacking ones sexuality as if it measures ones worth. It's both pathetic and embarassing that pandering idiots like you still exist. The experts all say the only ones who attack sexuality in that way are lacking security in their own sexuality. Is that what this is? You surpressing some homosexual fantasies soldier boy? Oh the confliction that must exist in your life must be excruciating.
-
11 hours ago, cannuck said:
And you think the financial status of that family dismisses the fact that they took money in an arrangement that was fraught with conflicts of interest on so many levels?????? So, being a totally useless tit that stumbles into a life of financial security excuses Liberals from their crimes?
Damn, even I can't afford you. The taxpayers of Canada sure as hell can't afford any more Trudeaus.
What are you new? Who said it dismisses it? Stop looking at your own hood ornament and you might see a bit better. Jeebus h christmas you folks have no vision, no imigination. Pigeon holed panderers stroking each others feathers lol. It's pathetic and embarassing to Canadians ffs.
-
20 hours ago, Army Guy said:
You have not proved jack shit so far muffin, intelligent and honest you've yet to prove that either, but hey you think I'm an easy mark then take your best shot.... or was that it...all you got is the chirp...thats what i thought....
Your mentality is far better matched with sports in my esitmation.
-
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:
Anyways, when we left off we were talking about how Trudeau has a long history of milking charities, from back before he was elected right up until after he was an MP.
Then Trudeau got We making propaganda for him and paying his family huge gobs of money for basically nothing, and in exchange he threw them some small bones in the low millions of dollars.
SOLICITING WE TO HOST EVENTS WHERE HIS MOM SPOKE:
WE CREATED A PROPAGANDA VIDEO FOR JUSTIN:
If there was nothing more to add to this story, it would have been an scandal (ethics breach) at this very point. Not one more thing was needed.Any reasonable human would think that it's a breach of ethics for the PM to solicit a charity to host events, pay them $$$ MILLIONS in taxpayer money, when huge amounts of it are going straight to his family, and some is being used to create propaganda for the PM.
The fact that Trudeau went to throw them a $900,000,000.00 bone is just a scandal on top of a scandal.
It's important to note that when news of the scandal first broke, the We 'charity' declared that Trudeau's family didn't receive any money from them, but that was a lie. They got approximately $500,000.00 from We.
WE CHARITY LIES, SAYS THAT THE TRUDEAUS NEVER RECEIVED MONEY:
Was this even a case where there was an actual need to spend money, and Trudeau slipped it to his lackeys without giving anyone else a chance to bid on it, or is it a case of Trudeau's government finding a way to funnel almost $1B into We?
SIDE NOTE: The We scandal and the SNC scandal are both extremely similar in nature: at the heart of both scandals is the attempt to get extremely lucrative government contracts into the hands of his pals, and in the We scandal for sure, some of that money was going back to his family. The fact that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing government officials to win bids: https://globalnews.ca/news/4954892/snc-lavalin-criminal-charges-montreal-bridge/?utm_expid=.kz0UD5JkQOCo6yMqxGqECg.0&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fglobalnews.ca%2Fnews%2F4954892%2Fsnc-lavalin-criminal-charges-montreal-bridge%2F leads on to wonder whether or not SNC found a way to get money into Trudeau's pocket as well.
(Too funny - I googled "Michel Fournier accepted $2.3M bribe CBC" and a bunch of other combos of those words, because that's originally where I got it from, and the CBC and Global links didn't come up. My own post on MLW forum came up, that's where I found the above link. Is that actually funny or is it getting harder and harder to bring up links where Fournier's bribe is mentioned? Can you guys find these on Google or Youtube?).
You go ahead and find a firm that large that isn't involved in some shennaigans. Come on man you guys live in reality certainly you can set aside the hatred for just a few minutes and engage in some critical thought. Or is that just impossible?
-
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:
Anyways, when we left off we were talking about how Trudeau has a long history of milking charities, from back before he was elected right up until after he was an MP.
Then Trudeau got We making propaganda for him and paying his family huge gobs of money for basically nothing, and in exchange he threw them some small bones in the low millions of dollars.
SOLICITING WE TO HOST EVENTS WHERE HIS MOM SPOKE:
WE CREATED A PROPAGANDA VIDEO FOR JUSTIN:
If there was nothing more to add to this story, it would have been an scandal (ethics breach) at this very point. Not one more thing was needed.Any reasonable human would think that it's a breach of ethics for the PM to solicit a charity to host events, pay them $$$ MILLIONS in taxpayer money, when huge amounts of it are going straight to his family, and some is being used to create propaganda for the PM.
The fact that Trudeau went to throw them a $900,000,000.00 bone is just a scandal on top of a scandal.
It's important to note that when news of the scandal first broke, the We 'charity' declared that Trudeau's family didn't receive any money from them, but that was a lie. They got approximately $500,000.00 from We.
WE CHARITY LIES, SAYS THAT THE TRUDEAUS NEVER RECEIVED MONEY:
Was this even a case where there was an actual need to spend money, and Trudeau slipped it to his lackeys without giving anyone else a chance to bid on it, or is it a case of Trudeau's government finding a way to funnel almost $1B into We?
SIDE NOTE: The We scandal and the SNC scandal are both extremely similar in nature: at the heart of both scandals is the attempt to get extremely lucrative government contracts into the hands of his pals, and in the We scandal for sure, some of that money was going back to his family. The fact that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing government officials to win bids: https://globalnews.ca/news/4954892/snc-lavalin-criminal-charges-montreal-bridge/?utm_expid=.kz0UD5JkQOCo6yMqxGqECg.0&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fglobalnews.ca%2Fnews%2F4954892%2Fsnc-lavalin-criminal-charges-montreal-bridge%2F leads on to wonder whether or not SNC found a way to get money into Trudeau's pocket as well.
(Too funny - I googled "Michel Fournier accepted $2.3M bribe CBC" and a bunch of other combos of those words, because that's originally where I got it from, and the CBC and Global links didn't come up. My own post on MLW forum came up, that's where I found the above link. Is that actually funny or is it getting harder and harder to bring up links where Fournier's bribe is mentioned? Can you guys find these on Google or Youtube?).
Oh the big bad trudeaus spoke at some events and got paid. News flash you doltish clown anyone with a name gets paid to speak. Just ask sheer and harps and any other connected individual. You clowns let your emotions skip right over the critical parts of every one of these mole hills.
-
23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
I'd be surprised if he's not a card-carrying member of the LPOC. He has the libspeak down pat.
Well surprise away muffin. Are you dissapointed now?
-
1 hour ago, Army Guy said:
Making more friends i see little ronny, good for you, before you know it you'll be running this place, you obviously to smart for all of us here.
Why on earth would I want to run this place? Are you ok? Like mentally speaking? You need me to call someone?
-
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:
Anyways, when we left off we were talking about how Trudeau has a long history of milking charities, from back before he was elected right up until after he was an MP.
Then Trudeau got We making propaganda for him and paying his family huge gobs of money for basically nothing, and in exchange he threw them some small bones in the low millions of dollars.
SOLICITING WE TO HOST EVENTS WHERE HIS MOM SPOKE:
WE CREATED A PROPAGANDA VIDEO FOR JUSTIN:
If there was nothing more to add to this story, it would have been an scandal (ethics breach) at this very point. Not one more thing was needed.Any reasonable human would think that it's a breach of ethics for the PM to solicit a charity to host events, pay them $$$ MILLIONS in taxpayer money, when huge amounts of it are going straight to his family, and some is being used to create propaganda for the PM.
The fact that Trudeau went to throw them a $900,000,000.00 bone is just a scandal on top of a scandal.
It's important to note that when news of the scandal first broke, the We 'charity' declared that Trudeau's family didn't receive any money from them, but that was a lie. They got approximately $500,000.00 from We.
WE CHARITY LIES, SAYS THAT THE TRUDEAUS NEVER RECEIVED MONEY:
Was this even a case where there was an actual need to spend money, and Trudeau slipped it to his lackeys without giving anyone else a chance to bid on it, or is it a case of Trudeau's government finding a way to funnel almost $1B into We?
SIDE NOTE: The We scandal and the SNC scandal are both extremely similar in nature: at the heart of both scandals is the attempt to get extremely lucrative government contracts into the hands of his pals, and in the We scandal for sure, some of that money was going back to his family. The fact that SNC has a court-documented history of bribing government officials to win bids: https://globalnews.ca/news/4954892/snc-lavalin-criminal-charges-montreal-bridge/?utm_expid=.kz0UD5JkQOCo6yMqxGqECg.0&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fglobalnews.ca%2Fnews%2F4954892%2Fsnc-lavalin-criminal-charges-montreal-bridge%2F leads on to wonder whether or not SNC found a way to get money into Trudeau's pocket as well.
(Too funny - I googled "Michel Fournier accepted $2.3M bribe CBC" and a bunch of other combos of those words, because that's originally where I got it from, and the CBC and Global links didn't come up. My own post on MLW forum came up, that's where I found the above link. Is that actually funny or is it getting harder and harder to bring up links where Fournier's bribe is mentioned? Can you guys find these on Google or Youtube?).
Pierre polievre rotflmao you guys are just the best
-
20 hours ago, Army Guy said:
You have not proved jack shit so far muffin, intelligent and honest you've yet to prove that either, but hey you think I'm an easy mark then take your best shot.... or was that it...all you got is the chirp...thats what i thought....
Yes I did in fact. You were wrong about the Trudeau goverment doing nothing on the vet file. You admitted it. I think if you look back at our little tryst that is what I set out to do. Having also been able to hightlight a few more of your unsavoury traits has been a bonus of sorts. Seems to have ruffled your feathers. Which if I am to be honest is entertaining so thanks for that at least.
-
9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
I don’t have an agenda with regards to you personally. You’re just an apologist, a liar and a troll and it’s important to point that out.
I never asked you how much money you make so I don’t know why you went there, but I’m pretty sure that I wouldn’t need to ‘afford you’: it’s plain to see that you can be played for a fool without much effort.
The irony of you calling me a partisan hack could lay tracks from Vancouver to Quebec City. You don’t even bother to think for yourself. You just drink stupidity straight from the Liberal Party of Canada’s fire hose.
You stated that informing you was " my job" thus the "you can't afford me" line. Do try and keep up sparky.
Oh and btw " irony" and "iron" aren't the same thing.
What an astounding display of intellectual prowess. Congratulations you may now enter the 4th grade this fall. Don't forget your helmet.
-
8 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
There’s nothing in your link that discusses the issues of the matter. Just the decision of a partisan hack.
We already know that loser waved his wand, but there’s nothing in there that discusses why he came to that conclusion. The closest he came was saying that Trudo’s ethics breach didn’t violate his ultra low standards:
It’s not merely the “appearance of conflict”, it is an “actual conflict of interest”.
The We charity was paying his mother a very unreasonable amount of money for her meagre services, and Justin Trudeau was in the habit of soliciting We to host events where she would speak.
For him to just jump to the conclusion that no one else in the country was even allowed to try to get involved in this was ridiculous. To say that we have a needed to spend $900 million on such a thing is also ridiculous.
If a clue came right up and bit you on the ass you still wouldn't have one. Trying to debate with you is like playing chess with seagulls. They shit all over the board and strut around claiming victory.
Your ignorance of the facts and the players in this whole story is simply astounding. No doubt a product of a whole host of garbage inputs you subcribe too and ingest on the regular.
The standards don't change from comissioner to comissioner that's just more incorrect info you are spreading. Which btw speaks to my issues with your credability.
Just as an aside do you think $1/2 million is alot of money to a family like the trudeau's?
-
On 5/20/2021 at 4:14 PM, Army Guy said:
Your right, I'm wrong, technically the government has done a few minor things for vets, they have opened a few of the closed vet affairs offices, and have returned a portion of the funds that were taken away...not all that were closed but some of them, I guess i should crawl back in my hole and be thankful...but Justins government made some serious promises, and has kept very little of them, in fact according to him we "Vets" are asking more than the government can give right now.... We just spent 400 bil i find that hard to swallow.
As for reading my drivel, here is a pointer, use the ignore feature, you won't have to read any of my stuff any more. and i won't have to respond to your superior leftist attitude, like some how i owe you more than i have already given... And if you or the majority of this nation did give a Fork, the government would be taking some sort of action, and yet total silence, not even a election issue... I know it is a liberal trait to say you care ,your that guy that had a "support the troops sticker on your car, because it was fashionable" not because you believed in it...but deep down your to busy or don't give a f**k... And thats OK, you be you and i'll be me...
You've not disproved anything, what you have said is "bullshit" and some how me and the rest of the readers here are suppose to bow down to your superior intelligence and take your word for it, thats not how this works "Governor"....So now i'm calling you out, prove the limited amount of facts i have provided are false...with any reasonable source of your liking...
Go ahead and read the 1st sentence. Shouldn't be too difficult you wrote it lol.
WE Charity Scandal
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
No childish insults there at all lol. You go fill yer boots sparky it appears you enjoy the smell.