I am an anglophone in and ADQ riding. I am not so appalled as I am confused. What exactly was PM Charest refering to concering Mr. Dumont's speech in Toronto. I am originally from London,Ontario so I would be interested to know.
The ADQ have certainly shown nothing in the way of 'inclusion' here in the Beauce and in fact my impression from my experience and interaction during the four years I've been here is that 'anglophones and minorities - visible or not' are openly and blatantly excluded here. It seems to be a matter ill-placed of protectionist pride. So I'd really like to know what, if anything, Mr. Dumont said in Toronto that would change the dismal impression I have. I haven't been able to get an answer of any kind from my ADQ MNA.
Is the ADQ for seperation or not ... can anybody tell me that before the vote.
I lived here before - quite successfully, from 1982 - 1990. My contribution was welcome in the job market at that time because anglophones with any business competency were in short supply. They still are but now the quality of english and english market savy offered is dismissed in lieu of hiring young, bilingual, francophones that we hope will not move away once they have acquired some professional experience. The salary incentives are not great here. I don't know why professional bilingual young people would want to stay in a closed society, but that's the theory anyway.
Mr. Charest seems to support - in theory - the notion of a 'unified' and 'inclusive' Québec but I'd like to see more oversight into the actual discriminatory service delivery in this area. He seems to turn a blind eye because we are of course - the invisible minority here.
For me, Mr. Boisclair, appears to promise the most 'inclusion' for all Québecois and Québecoise regardles of age, ethnic background, language ... didn't I read something about that kind of protection somewhere else ... but the seperation issue still scares me. Where would I fit in a soverign Québec once my vote is cast.
It occurs to me that in an independant Québec, my contributions might actually be seen and valued as the assets they are, rather than the threat they are suspected to be in the current circumstance.
So I could either go for the status quo and hope for improvement and accountability ... go for the PQ and hope for inclusion in something different ... or go for the ADQ and get more of what has already done me in ...
I remain as confused and undecided as I was when this began ... I appreciate the comments here though ...