abcon99

And why are liberals always posting one liners, and snotty comments? I was under the impression that you people had so much to say, and that you were all so smart it put poor stupid little conservatives like me to shame. You dirty pile of excrement. (Now, I must admit that my irritation is leading me down the path of openly calling for myself to be banned, right now.) BAN ME. But first, the question, does anyone actually care about being banned, I am just curious if it actually matters to anyone. Hurry and just answer why it really matters, and then I can get some food, have a smoke, and forget I ever got on this thing on Dec.4, 2006. What is the fastest someone has been banned. Not important, but just wondering. This sucks ass.

Yes, a ban would reveal what I have said all along. Most people in Canada are content to live under anti democratic conditions, and to totally ignore free speech as a right, even though they yap about every other right under the sun. You have just proved my point, that the people on this site only care about pissing conservatives off talking about spelling and grammer, and ignoring the real meat of the post, and what that person was trying to exress. And then when that person responds, they get pissy and wuss out like most liberals. Your stupidity is starting to bore me, so hurry up and ban me. And just like I said, no one cared to comment on the legality of what I said, or offered an opinion on what the truth of the matter was. Went right for jeez, ban this guy already. Just wondering, do people in the internet world actually care if they get banned? Just wondering, perhaps we could discuss why the threat of ban would scare them, and what bans mean to free speech, but no, I expect more useless attacks on spelling. I will make you a deal, if a liberal out there will answer all the points I made before my spelling was attacked, as well as the issues that developed after my response to that, then I will leave this site voluntarily, and right after I read it and respond. Sound like a deal. Good, now get typing.

To Norm: All Harper needs is 38-42% to support, and vote for him, and we stay in and keep fighting. Even if 33-38% support him and the war, he can still stay Prime Minister in a minority parliment, and since he only promised to have the votes before deployment, not that he would listen, we stay in that case. As a Conservative I do not agree that the Prime Minister should have this power, but you Eastern people never let us guys from Alberta change any of the other anti democratic stuff in the country, so why should I cry for you over this one.

The point is no party can count on our support, even if they are on the right. Look at Social Credit, the were in power, didn't keep up, and got turfed, never to return, and I bet they were shocked as hell, thinking they didn't have to worry. We may vote for Conservative parties, but that will not assure the Conservative Party of Canada that if they screw us, or don't deliver on a large portion of the promises, we will find someone who will. Liberals love the party, Conservatives love being Conservative and seeing things run how they want them, it is very different. I like Prime Minister Harper, but don't think for a second that I would have problems throwing him to the wolves if he screws Alberta on the federal stage. Or even if I thought he was incompetent, weak, or a problem from an idealogical point of view.

Webmaster, hmmm, so does that make Greg my masta. Yes sir boss, you knows I do anything. I'sa sorry boss, don't mind me. My god, now I remember why I waited all these years to get my own computer, this place is insane.

And being afraid of Greg, now that I know who he is, would mean that I actually cared that he has said power, and would be sad if he used it. And I would not call a judge an idiot unless I really believed he was, and then to hell with what comes. I have no idea yet if Greg is an idiot or not, I will wait to make that decision when I have dealings with him. And it seems that will be soon, so I'll just have to wait.

Pissed off people for good, bad, or no reason at all go nuts and lay waste. Mentioning that people who are robbed would have reason to go nuts and lay waste is not a threat, a terrorist threat, or even advocation of that act. Why do some posters seem to think I'm angry, I'm sitting here laughing my @$% off. And I've been around cops many times, and if they want to chat, I'm all ears. But don't say something should be reported to the RCMP unless you intend to actually do it. I may consider it a threat against me. Maybe he has dirty cops in his pocket, how would I know. Man do you people ever take this posting stuff seriously, maybe this really isn't my cup of tea, I can't abide foolish people, and perhaps forums are not a good place to have fun argueing about stuff. I'll wait awhile to decide, cause this is kinda fun, I want to see what happens.

And who is Greg? Is this perhaps some leftist cabal I wandered into?

It might be fun to take this to court, so by all means, what are you waiting for, PM me and we can get the ball rolling. It would amuse me if they did consider this kind of speech to be a breach of the law, and it would be fun to see who won in the end. Back up your stuff or what is the point of writing it. Since my firm belief is that since we do not have proper rep. in the house or senate, I guess that would also mean I don't recognize the law. Hmmmm. Not recognizing the law if I'm wrong because I don't agree that they have the moral authority to have any laws is interesting to me as well. Hey, if I go to jail, you have to pay taxes to feed and clothe me, and I don't work. What does it cost to house a prisoner for one year? I thought I read it was between $60,000 and $80,000. Correct me if I'm wrong.

If you don't know the difference between a threat, and terrorist overtones, maybe you should study up my friend. People have gone on killing sprees because they thought the dog told them to, so saying theft of billions is a good reason for Alberta being pissed, and not boo hoo crap is called free speech skippy. And I seem to recall bumper stickers that said "let the eastern bastards freeze to death it the dark" and it was meant to signal that we would cut off the power, and that is our right, and that we would battle the feds, and may separate. If you have true belief in your position, and that of your post, get calling, and you will discover what the law is. If you want to put the RCMP in touch with me, write [email protected] for more information.

Since making you poor so you freeze to death is not illegal, and no direct threat was made, perhaps you should stick your head in a law book and discover what is a threat, a direct threat, and a terrorist threat, and what is political commentary, and then get back to me. Also, you must know you are doing something wrong, and since saying stealing billions is a reason to go on said spree is not promotion or even a threat of the writer actually doing said act, get your head out of your @#&.

I never said the wheat board or the health care systems would be destroyed, or that government safety nets are wrong. You just can't force people to sell you the crops or they go to jail, or force people to wait in line when they can pay to get treatment. Stopping it from being completly communist or socialist is the choice that people have, to sell to the government mandated monopolies, or go out on ones own. If I was a farmer, I have no idea if I would continue to use the wheat board, but I can assure you I would fight for choice, even if it is not my choice.

As to "calm down" "do not promote violence", let me put this in point form to help clear you up on a few things. 1. Never tell me to calm down, if you want me off the site, then make it happen, don't you ever dare believe one word you say matters to me, and don't you dare believe you can tell me what to do. You have no proof that I am not calm, so keep your editorial comments on my state of mind to yourself, and report what you want to report. 2. That you reported this incident is amusing to me, so obviously I am calm. And as to before, my disgust at fools who don't respond to the fullness of a post, and concentrate on trivial matters, means I think they should get there heads on straight, and I should tell them so in no uncertain terms. My delight in commenting on their absolute uselessness to this forum is enjoyable, so yet again, you are wrong, that makes me calm in that case. 3. Being grumpy, nasty, mean, and conservative means that I don't care about anything trivial that these leftist bring up, so I respond in my way. You assume that leads to me not being calm, but we all know that to assume makes a (well, you know). 4. The most important point "promote violence", needs to be addressed. If you thought it was out of bounds, you should have said so, and reported it, but I have not received a ruling, so it is not fact yet my friend. And I know it was not promotion in the context it was used, so even if the ruling was against me, I'm Conservative, I agree with courts when I think they are right, not if I think they are wrong, in law terms. ex.(in the U.S. abortion was made legal by the courts, while I think reasonable choice is acceptable, I do not agree with the ruling, as it is in no way in the U.S. constitution, and a peice of paper is not a living document, its dead, and you could wipe your arse with it anyway, I follow the letter of the law, not your interpretation of it.) I used fiery rhetoric to illustrate a point, saying that stealing billinons is a reason to go on a "killing spree", I did not promote said spree, of even comment on if it would be right under those conditions. It was also in a province vs. province context, and dealing with political power, wealth and well being. I do advocte destroying Ontarion legally, and would be happy to discuss that and how it could be done, and why it should happen, and also if I see it as very possible in the near future. Also when I say east, I mean Toronto and Montreal, with some help from certain ridings in WelfareAtlantica.

As to the garbage of reporting simple exaggeration to the Admin. when clearly the text of the post in no way advocates illegal action is just foolishness. Using a phrase like "go on a killing spree" in the context of political action, in one part of the post, and then having all the context of what is being discussed left out, is crap. Pedophiles deserve to have the balls chopped off, but saying that doesn't in any way lead to saying that I advocate people going out and chopping balls off. Saying they deserve that, or that for stealing from Alberta, the people have a reason for a killing spree, doesn't advocate it, it merely describes a perfectly normal sentiment. To advocte violence, I would have to say that it should be done, not that the thing that is causing it is a reason why it could happen, or would be understandable.

What the hell does that have to do with whether English has a capital E or not. Maybe you missed the shift key and don't think exressing an opinion on a silly fun little forum about politics calls for handwringing about stupid garbage. And explain how it matters if you say crap english, or crappy english, of crappy English. The point is it makes no difference, and the only people who comment on it are those who can't respond to the meat of the post, so they pretend they are smart by bringing this stupid junk up, time after time. This is about politics, and to even say that how you type on a forum connects at all with how the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada speaks English on television just shows no class and no brains.