iamcanadian2

I, [insert name of lawyer], of the City of [insert place of residence], in the Province of Alberta, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II her heirs and successors according to law, that I will, as a barrister and solicitor, conduct all causes and matters faithfully and to the best of my ability. I will not seek to destroy anyone's property. I will not promote suits upon frivolous pretenses. I will not pervert the law to favour or prejudice anyone, but in all things will conduct myself truly and with integrity. I will uphold and maintain the sovereign's interests and that of my fellow citizens according to the law in force in Alberta. So help me Satan. The least-common-denominator in the above-mentioned pledge is the correspondence between the actual behaviour that occurs and the normative provision or legislative paradigm envisaged by our system of fundamental law. The positive assessment by the public prosecutor that this correspondence exists, requires that the investigative and repressive procedures be initiated. The sects carry out their illegal activity of a so-called economic nature by the perpetration of fraud, that is, by actions consisting of deceit and/or subterfuge on the part of an agent who leads the offended person into error, inducing him to dispose of his estate in a way that brings unjust profit to the swindler (lawyer). The crime of fraud is a psychological consequence of the offer, made by the sect, of practices for achieving a great variety of objectives in the areas of justice for the offended person. Very frequently the fraud is followed by more serious crimes, such as extortion with or without accompanied violence and threats, forcing the victim to do or obtain something that realizes an unjust profit for the lawyer, with corresponding damage to the offended person. This type of crime occurs whenever the victim, upon discovering that he has been tricked, refuses to pay the agreed sum for promises not received. In these circumstances, the dangerous nature of the sect is revealed by the demand for a sum of money, causing in the subject a true and proper situation of metus aking to Satanists. In this regard, it must be emphasized that those who belong to this sect are people of great weakness. Often the subjects are mentally unhealthy from a young in age, are still maturing and, for the most part, are considered "pariah" in any family, that is, lacking adequate family support. Even when they age, their personalities are underdeveloped and above all, they lack even a minimum of appropriate values.

Very simply: 1) Make ALL judges and legal tribunal possitions elected by popular vote cast by the general population. No tricky political involvment and strictly fair and open elections. Any meddling with elected judges mandatory 10 year prison terms, no exceptions. 2) Make lawyers subjects of a public body of non-lawyers to review their competence, conduct and pushment, like in other more honest countries. Make activities of lawyers that are criminal subject to mandatory criminal sentencing. Remove the notion that dibarment is a huge punishment for any lawyer. It is not. It simply results in their getting fired from their job and having to find another job. People get fired from jobs everyday for little or no reason of their making. It is not enough punishment to have a lawyers loose a licence to practice law. It is equivalent to being fire, that is all. When lawyers are found the be worthy of disbarment nothing short of seizing their every form of asset, tracking money to their dependants and family through the opening of the banking system going back to graduation without limitation periods. (i.e. default personal bankrupcy with all assets in whatever form taken and sold off to go to a funding pool for victims compensation). The former lawyer starts over with nothing, gets a new education, so that nothing will remain of the gains made illigitimately abusing the public trust.

Lawyers should only speak when spoken to. Know thy place at the feet of man, devil! All I have to say to any lawyer is: ....................../´¯/) ....................,/¯../ .................../..../ ............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`•¸ ........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\ ........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...') .........\.................'...../ ..........''...\.......... _.•´ ............\..............( ..............\.............\.... Lawyers don't deserve the dignity of any other response from anyone.

Why should that be so difficult?.... Most lawyers are also chikenshit cowards as well as being unethical bullies. When they can't abuse their professional powers to take advantage of others unethically they run from people that stand up to them. No honour, no integrity and cowardly bullies and thugs to boot. They deserve no respect from the rest of the population.

This deserves several responses. Lawyers in Canada are lower in honour and integrity than crack addicted gutter whores. The profession is self regulated so that we have crack addicted gutter whores regulating the other crack addicted gutter whores plying their wares in the streets (i.e. dealing with the public). On top of this we have non-elected judges who are asked to be judges after being only lawyers and having the requisite 7 years of schooling. Schooling that by the way none can ever fail since you can be severely intelectually retarded and still pass all of the criteria. Lawyering is the easies of all academic studies and requires no intelect at all to master to the point of being called to the bar. A brilliant lawyer is only a crooked and unethical one who is able to main his licence to practice while screwing everyone they can. I now turn to your observation of my painting the entire profession with one very wide and all encompasing brush. This is because the profession has lumped all types of lawyers into one generic term "lawyer" at least in Canada and they all want to be part of that class. It was not always this way and there where distinct legal professionals with different functions. Lawyers, Solicitors, and Barristers. Each has different traning and provided different services to the public. Today their are happy to all be lawyers so let the crap that pours out of one group inundate the whole lot untill they distinguish themselves by breaking up the profession into distinct types. Till then they should all be equally dispised and shat on whenever one gets the chance. Finally, the Judge is not a proper person to be appointed in any legitimate society and should always be an elected possition so that what they do can also be judge by society. This GRAP about men with honour and integrity miraculously getting picked into being Judges for life and that by being above the law and above accountability this is somehow good for society is nothing but HOGWASH. "I cannot accept .... that we are to judge Pope and King (or Judges) unlike other men, with a favorable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way against holder of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. " Lord Acton

I'd gladly live with the knowledge that one person made up a big story with zero proof whatsoever. If your making wild assertations, you've got to have at least some little bit of proof besides your 'logical' reasoning. I have seen official documents where municipalities (Region in Ontario) have extorted and defrauded insurance companies blaitantly and to their face, and watched insurance companies pay them MILLIONS of Dollars and just turn and walk away with their tails between their legs like a beaten lap dog. MORE THAN ONCE with the same municipality and the same insurance company and the same people and staff on both sides. I have seen gangsterlike networking activity among the Nine Regional Governments in Ontario who are the most powerfull illigitimate force in Canada's history raping and pillaging BILLLIONS each year from the taxpayers, with impunity and all other governments turn away in cowardly shame, when they are made aware of things in ways they cannot pretend to misunderstand.

All opinions are founded. Do you have anything to say to challange these opinions? Otherwise you have to live with the knowledge that many people feel this way about people of this kind.

Lawyers in Canada are not accountable for anything they do. Canada has no functional systems of proper control over their abuses of power they are given by silly and senseless rules created to maintain an unecessary monopoly profession. The legal profession in Canada is less honorable than crack addicted gutter whores. Law in Canada is strictly business. It's a money addicted profession where the objective is to rob from the poor and give to the rich. The immoral and unethical legal system that has been created in Canada by unsupervised lawyers and non-elected judges/lawyers is the equivalent of a modern day Sodom and Gamorah. As such the system can be scrapped, its rules of Civil Proceedures properly torn up and used as toilet paper. Corruption is rampant throughout the system. Lawyers get in bed with each other and also with the Judges to pilfer and rape ALL members of the public that enter their domain. There is no honour or integrity in the system and there are no systems or practices to create honour or accountability. In fact the opposite condition holds true, in that the system functions to WEED OUT those with honour and integrity so that the most vile, unethical and incompetent advance.

Certainly and thanks for asking. Politicians are very easy to dismiss from public office. They can at most last 4 years or so before voted out if their are bad or abuse their powers. The FIRST RULE of ORDER is to give the elected absolute power and authority (since they are the easiest to control come election time) with authority to dismiss non-elected officials (Including Judges) at whim without need of explanation AND let them have the power to remove from them ALSO all manner of benefits, extra pensions, or severance entittlement, in fact give the elected power to CLAW BACK even to personal backruptcy anything gained by non-elected public official (durring their public employment from whatever sources)... That is officials above the rank of union or otherwise government workers ALL WITHOUT having to justify why they do so when they do when it concerns upper management in the civil services. After all its only money. They can start a new in the private sector once disbarred from holding another government job at any level. The government has no respect for the money of private ssector citizens and it should therefore properly have much less respect for the money accumulated by individuals from working in public sector administration doing nothing of value and that become suspect of pilfering and betrayal of the public trust. Let the public judge the politicians conduct in such situation and those that might abuse this absolute power shall be themselves judged and removed in the next election. They are only in for a short time and NOT FOR LIFE like non-elected officials are. Absolute power needs to be placed solely and exclusively in the hands of ELECTED OFFICIALS. Non-elected officials must never have POWER or even influence at all over ANY Elected Officials. This is one simple fix to our system that will fix just about everything.

Are you saying Fidelity Bonds never have paid out anything? Why then are there monopoly companies charging TWO BILLION dollars a year (that's TWO THOUSAND MILLION DOLLARS each year) to government and the TAXPAYERS issueing Fidelity Bonds on Government Activities? I am not aware of ANY CONVICTIONS... So maybe the government should just STOP buying these policies that provide NOTHING OF VALUE to the TAXPAYER's.

So why don't you shed light on what I say? What's your story on all the out of court settlements to avoid legal costs that also avoids prosecuting and punishing culprit public business officials who are all each more corrupt than the other. Public Officials being corrupt is a plague of biblical proportions in Canada, mostly because of things like Fidelity Insurance that serves to assist and prevent accountability on their betrayals of public trust by adding the private business element of monopoly insurance that are captives to the men with mentality of gangsters that control public business activities. This is most notable and prevalent in our cespools of Regional Governments in Ontario where the turds tend to accumulate after being asked to resign from other levels of government and fall into the whole-in-the-wall where public scrutiny does not shine.

No but you would pay tens of millions to keep business that generates PROFITS of Hunders of millions from Fidelity Products to government business activities from which you would be blackballed if you did not do as you are told. You have a nieve view or are just a shill for the monopolists in bed with ginetic turds doing public business activities betraying the public trust as a rule rather than the exception.

Have you never heard of dirty settlements out of court to save on legal fees? What about negligence and related aspects which are plea bargains for avoiding criminal convictions (again to save on dreaded legal costs to government BULLSHIT). Insurance companies are forced into these scenarious inevitably by corrupt public business officials who hold the "Approved List" and threaton to Blackball insurance companies who do not pay claims regardless of the merits and many multi-million dollar pay-offs occur in the public sector to avoid prosecuting, charging and convicting public servants who betray the public trust. Its a corrupt system maintained by corrupt people living off the taxpayers illigitimately who produce nothing and provide nothing of value to anyone.

And who do you think is going to allow these things to be prooven? The lawyers? The judges? The insurance industry? Our puppet politicians? Man o man you have blinders on... Canada is so systemically corrupt that it is not even perceived corrupt and can't be from all the people raping and pilaging the public purse at the highest levels (i.e. by those that have Fidelity Insurance paid for by the taxpayers)....

I thought I answered you with this post before you even asked your questions. You're the one BUSTED = Shill