Deluge

It makes perfect sense! You can't stfu about priests who are pedophiles, and it's not because you are opposed to pedophilia but it's because you love hearing and reading about it.

Pssst.... it's actually because you support pedophilia.

There's no Karen here, wackjob. The time for rational debate is over - you've proven yourself unfit. Now, back to simple questions like why you support drag queens getting time with children. Is this also part of your therapy?

There's no Karen here, wackjob. The time for rational debate is over - you've proven yourself unfit. Now, back to simple questions like why you support drag queens getting time with children. Is this also part of your therapy?

No rubbish. Answer that post.

Why do you support drag queens getting time with kids?

This is good, CrackWhore. It's good to try and differentiate between your hallucinations and your actual experiences. Just try to remember that Jesus is a historical figure and "Donald" is actually your uncle Sue.

It's even more relevant now, as evidenced by your cowardly retreat from the history of gay marriage piece. Face it, my friend, gay marriage serves no real purpose. There's no practical use for it, no moral need for it, it's just a byproduct of societal decay.

LOL. You must've had a pretty jarring childhood, CrackWhore. Do you want to talk about it, or are you saving this kind of stuff for your therapist?

THAT would certainly be appropriate, as you both could also discuss the destruction of the free world while you inspect each other's Covid protection masks - maybe even swap stories about which young girl's hair smells the best.

Sure there is, and it starts with history. Go ahead and take a shot at that last post. It's relevant, and I'm not going to just let you walk away from it. And I would advise against people who want society to be run on secular grounds against misusing words like rational.

You're still hiding. Why are you cowering in that corner?

Don't be frightened, CrackWhore. They're just simple questions. If they're too difficult for you, if they're too close to the truth then just say so. No one will think any less of you for being honest.

That's not evolution; it's devolution, you've perverted a time honored tradition. The argument is that there is no rational or practical reason for gay marriage. If you disagree, and I know you do, then go ahead and talk about the history of gay marriage. Explain the necessity for gay marriage throughout the ages. Explain how gay marriage was critical to the rise of civilizations.

I asked for your opinion, not what the law says. Are you having trouble reading? Do you need eye glasses or is it just that your comprehension skills suck? In your opinion, what should the age of consent be? No laws are being broken as far as I can tell, but do you think it's appropriate for drag queens to read stories to children? What about strip bars? Do you think it's appropriate for drag queens to perform for kids in strip bars?

We've evolved on racial issues, which is a good thing, but that doesn't help the gay marriage argument. Your problem is that you're trying to make race and sexual preference the exact same thing. You're saying that since men and women of different skin colors can now marry each other, that men and men should be able to marry each other too. Explain the logic there.

In your opinion, what should the age of consent be?

I don't know, but I wouldn't want anything to do with them. We all should have the right to marry anyone of the opposite sex that we want.

No you don't. In fact I bet you would think that pretty f*cking cool.

My issue with LGBT has been their designs on marriage. Marriage has always been defined as between man and woman, yet homosexuals won't have it. "Civil unions? F*ck off, we want to redefine the tradition of marriage". You're a homosexual? Fine; it's a free country, just don't mess with marriage. The 2015 ruling needs to be overturned.

Then we both agree that drag queens having story time with kids, and also drag queens introducing kids to strip dancing is wrong and needs to be stopped, yes?

Mimicking me isn't going to get you through this. I've already told you where I stand with pedophiles, and that includes pedophiles who are/were also clergy. Now it's your turn: Where do you stand on the issue of drag queens wanting access to young boys?

I have been pretty awful to some of you, haven't I. I'll try to do better.

Answer the post.

I certainly don't, but I think you might. Talk about where you stand with drag queens wanting access to young boys.