CrakHoBarbie

So you agree, Donald did not lose the 2020 election through fraud. Nice. It's about time.

I meant fraud widespread enough to have made a difference... You know, the fraud Donald insisted lost him the election... Your the pea-brain who decided you'd weasel out of it with your moronic claims of "oh the media did this" which you mistakenly believed lost Donald the election. And by the way, the "fraud" you listed isn't viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. So go refresh your dentu-grip, gramps. You've lost yet another argument.

Fraud, to a certain extent, exists in every election bonehead.... Always has .. always will. If you weren't such a dimwit you'd know that. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.voanews.com/a/2020-usa-votes_how-widespread-voter-fraud-us/6195819.html&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwi7m4reo_n7AhWSEkQIHd1_DmQQFnoECAMQAg&usg=AOvVaw371VVDvVIkgNNpVpH0JKbg

If you cannot prove your assumed fraud swayed the election, then youve got a handful of shite. What you need is evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. And that you do not have..... Jesus

Let's assume for a moment (and I know your really good at Assuming) that what you say was true... None of the "frauds" you've speculated happened were widespread enough to have any affect on the 2020 election. Donald claimed massive voter fraud stole the election from him. Yet he has yet to present any evidence of said fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. This is something your childish responses can ever mask. Bla, bla, bla..... You still have yet to present any evidence of voter fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. If Donald had any evidence of voter fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law, he'd of already presented it... Boy.

You keep posting gossip, speculation, suppositions and innuendo as if it were viable evidence that supported your "feelings".... I keep pointing out just how absurd your "feelings" are..... You need to learn how to differentiate between "opinion" and verified facts. Got it idog?

You tell me...

What you ignore is your lack of evidence of voter fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. The entire foundation of Donald's quest for reinstatement is based on a lie. And you are just too gullible or stupid, or both to understand that.

Those feelings ( opinions) have never been validated with evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. So no, they were not based on valid arguments. Period

These people just spew excuse after excuse after excuse.... It's like talking to wall... An extremely gullible dimwitted wall.

Your pals swarmed the capital, not because they had evidence of foul play.... Oh no.... They did it because their "feelings" were hurt when Donald lost. Feelings are not evidence of foul play. So they had zero justification for swarming the capital. . F__k your feelings.

And this statement is based on your "feelings" as well? Classic ...

"Feelings" are not viable evidence. Thank you for admitting that your brethren violently attacked the capital with no evidence but their "feelings".

These gullible cultists will try anything to change the subject. Gish galloping.... Whataboutisms.... Straw man arguments.... You name it, they with throw it on their pile of excuses.

Your speculation is not proof of fraud. Are you ever going to recognize the difference between speculation and evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law?

MAGA=they

Yes. As Americans we have the right to voice our displeasure if an election doesn't go the way we like. What we do not have the right to do, is block the the legal transfer of power through violence. Which is what we experienced on Jan6th..... But why were they there? They were there because Donald told them the election was rigged. And those gullible fools believed him.... Hook line and sinker..... And here's your favorite line... They believed him even though he had absolutely no evidence of fraud viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law..... And he still doesn't. And you're still carrying his torch. It's unbelievable.

No. Why did those people swarm the capital?

Why were they there?

So you e justified their actions by pointing out the ones who did not smash their way in? Wow.... What a compelling argument.

Worthless buffoon. Here's some video of your pals being welcomed into the Capital on Jan6th. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D_E-6bRNfx2c&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiXhYTMjfL7AhXJIUQIHTG8CxAQtwJ6BAgGEAE&usg=AOvVaw08_jWnbJaG9D3f37Q9eJiH

That's your "opinion"... Which is worthless... Because you can present no evidence of fraud widespread enough nor viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. And no matter how many times you try to change the subject, that truth stands.

OMG.... Another whataboutism!! What a f__king dimwit. The BLM riots came about because of police brutality towards African Americans.... The capital got swarmed because of Donald's fabricated fraud. Y'all swarmed the capital on a lie. Total genius.

Your whataboutism has been duly noted boy. Still waiting for that evidence of voter fraud widespread enough to of influenced the election, and viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. No matter how many times you insult me or/and try and change the subject, the reality remains.... You have no evidence that Donald lost 2020 through fraud.

Nobody swarmed the capital over the claims of Russian collusion.