CrakHoBarbie

Trumps "campaign " were the ones who initiated all the recounts and forensic audits. All of those recounts found squat. Thus, Donald has failed to present any evidence of voter fraud ( big enough to of made a difference) viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. Donald took his shot.... Donald failed. Now he needs to go to prison for trying to circumvent democracy.

The people who carried out tge multiple recounts and forensic audits had full access to all ballot data. Even with full access, no evidence of voter fraud (large enough to of made a difference) viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law was ever found. Keep in mind, Donald warned of voter fraud before the 2016 election, and never stopped with his unsubstantiated claims of voter faud.

It's a waste of time responding to cdnfox. The guy has absolutely no moral or ethical fortitude. He's a obstinate scab. You do better talking to a piece of dog shit on the curb. The dog shit has more moral fiber than that scab.

So you know that Donald attempted to circumvent the rightful electors, thus disenfranchising millions of voters and reinstalling himself in power through fraudulent means.... And you still prefer him back in power? There's no way to sugar coat this. Your an unethical piece of shit. Were done.

Finally. Thus, as i said earlier, even though we've gone through multiple recounts and forensic audits, donalds still never been able to produce any evidence of voter fraud (large enough to of made a difference) viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. Donalds also now claimed that he "had every right" to Interfere in the federal election, (assuming that he believed he had that right because the election was stolen from him), there may be legal ramifications now that he's admitted he "lost" the election. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/trump-basically-admits-to-interfering-in-2020-election-wont-hesitate-to-do-it-again

So those conducting the recounts and forensic audits didn't have access to this data?

This news is such a relief. Now I don't have to worry that Donald might Win the election. Whew!! Boy, do I feel better.

I'm not going to ask again.

I asked you for something specific: You made a claim that "raw data" wasn't accessible during the recounts and forensic audits. I'm asking you to support your statements with citations. Are you a Trump supporter?

Again.... You made a claim that "raw data" wasn't accessible during the recounts and forensic audits. I'm asking you to support your statements with citations.

Ok. Let's put aside the legalities for a moment. Do you believe that a president who was voted out of office by "we the people", should be allowed to retain said office if he can get his vice president to accept electors that are not abiding by the tallied votes?

You made a claim that "raw data" wasn't accessible during the recounts and forensic audits. I'm asking you to support your statements with citations. Ok. Then support your statements with citations.

What "raw data" are you claiming was not accessed and prove your contention with citations.

Donald hatched and implemented a plan to install fake electors in multiple states. Had he succeeded, not only would he of disenfranchised millions of voters, he'd of also succeeded in reinstalling himself in power. Make no mistake, Donald attempted a coup d'etat. That coup d'état failed.

So, you claim you don't believe enough fraud happened to sway the election.... But you also believe if said fraud did happen, that evidence has been hidden from all the recounts and forensic audits.... Fascinating....

And our Universe is encased in a speck in the eye of a blue eyed giant.

Unfortunately for donald, he never presented any evidence of voter fraud viable enough To be substantiated in a court of law. And keep in mind Donald and his sycophants left no stone unturned in their quest to prove the fraud. Multiple recounts in multiple states. Still no fraud found. Forensic audits costing millions of dollars that found no evidence of wrongdoing viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. Donald lost the election fair and square and only used his claims of fraud in an attempt justify his attempted coup d'état. Donalds a traitor, as are every single one of his halfwitted sycophants.

Donald Trump, who, for the last four years has denied the reality of his 2020 election defeat, told podcaster Lex Fridman that he lost the election "by a whisker". What’s more, the on-air comments came on the heels of nearly identical remarks late last week. At a far-right event in Washington, D.C., the Republican said in reference to Biden, “He beat us by a whisker. It was a terrible thing.” So, let's recap: For the last four years Donald and his moronic sycophants have taken every opportunity to insist the election was stolen. And now, right before the new election he unwittingly concedes the loss. It should be fun to watch how donalds cultists try and talk their way out of this one. https://www.yahoo.com/news/maddow-blog-whisker-trump-acknowledges-173748470.html

Donalds halfwitted sycophants have their ignorant noses so far nestled up donalds rancid ass cheeks, that they are literally oblivious to the painfully obvious signs of his encroaching dementia. Let's be very clear: Donalds Grandfather. Donalds Father. Donalds Sister. All died from Alzheimers. Because of this family history we can postulate that Donald is in the throes of suffering the same fate. His culty little traitor ass kissers will never acknowledge that fact.

No. I keister them. It's such a refreshingly clean feeling.

The polling "Nostradamus" who predicted Donald Trump's victory in 2016, just predicted that Kamala Harris would win the Presidency come November. Historian Allan Lictman became known as the "Nostradamus" of U.S. elections for his impressive track record forecasting the outcomes of presidential races for over 40 years using his prediction model, "The Keys to the White House." He was one of the few pundits to correctly call the 2016 election for former President Donald Trump and predicted a victory for President Joe Biden in 2020. His prediction model has been correct for decades. That is the only reason I lend any credibility to his predictions. https://www.newsweek.com/allan-litchtman-election-prediction-harris-2024-1949212

Best comment of the day here^ Thank you Chrissy!

What a moronic statement. She was an AG. A prosecutor. What's really absurd is a little, inconsequential man, such as yourself, is coming here attempting to berate someone as accomplished and adept as Harris. You're not qualified to clean the mud off her shoes. You're a pathetic halfwit cult member. Here's some helpful resources for you: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiT94DPi6yIAxW5le4BHRp5Jp0QFnoECBEQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fculteducation.com%2Fdirectory-of-cult-recovery-resources.html&usg=AOvVaw1IFnlKh3vzGYy0HlIogY9Q&opi=89978449 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiT94DPi6yIAxW5le4BHRp5Jp0QFnoECA8QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forensiccounselor.org%2F%3FTopics_of_Interest__Cults_and_Support_for_Former_Cult_Members&usg=AOvVaw0u0B9YLnxBzhVlJMzqqjAE&opi=89978449

Well, the "oranges" of his dementia are blossoming all over his family tree. His Grandfather His Father His Sister Dudes a ticking time bomb. Have you heard his newest Interview with Lex Fridman? He sounds like he's on barbiturates. https://podcasts.apple.com/nz/podcast/9-4-24-trump-fails-with-lex-fridman-kamala-leading-by/id402050558?i=1000668378385 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiWrfaViayIAxXsHUQIHdbUJNwQwqsBegQIIRAF&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DqCbfTN-caFI&usg=AOvVaw0w3e5IWTo_EEkw_A4SJOq1&opi=89978449

Thank you RB!!