CrakHoBarbie

What else would her losing be, if not a failure? If she fails to win, that is a definite failure.

This has nothing to do with Boebert and gods special relationship, where God tells Boebert to change districts, then boebert loses. My guess is God doesn't like Boebert as much as she thinks he does.

I said a "reasonable" explanation. You've just thrown insults and name-calling.

I see. So you're having problems articulating a reasonable explanation for your comment. Perhaps the "Popeye " response might work for you.... Just repeat "I yam what I yam" over and over.

I talk to a poster on another forum that speaks in tongues and claims it's God talking through him. By your logic ( unless that was sarcasm) then he should probably be president.

How do you figure? If God told her to move districts, and then she loses, it would stand to reason that the all knowing, all seeing supernatural entity knew that would happen. Why else would he send her there?

Republican Congressperson Lauren Boebert stated she asked God for guidence about switching districts. And God talked to her saying: 'Do you have more faith in your ability to fight or my ability to open a door?'" The Colorado Republican announced in December that she would be switching congressional districts. Boebert said she would leave her existing seat in Colorado's 3rd congressional district for the more conservative 4th congressional district instead. What I'm wondering is if God told her to move districts and she loses, does that mean God set her up to fail? https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.businessinsider.com/lauren-boebert-god-told-her-press-on-with-district-switch-2024-3&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwj-sY2An96EAxWsKUQIHUghB-kQFnoECAcQAg&usg=AOvVaw2fmn9wuMWkaE1dOhTyuXOM

Thank you for posting

My screen name does exactly what it was intended to do. It weeds out the fools. Forgive me if I hurt your feelings. I typically criticize someone as immature when they act below an expected level of maturity. It's only my opinion.

I see. You feel my disagreeing with you justifies your incivility. But you are absolutely wrong. You wouldnt go to a city council meeting and talk to folks the way you do. You'd get booted. No, you're just comfortable doing it here under the veil of anonymity because you're a bully, and here they allow you to be a bully without fear of repercussions. That's who you are.

Only from folks who aren't mature enough to remain civil.

So prove me wrong. Start posting on a regulated forum. You will be banned because you cannot stay civil with folks you disagree with. You've proven that over and over again. Case in point.

You simply cannot remain civil.

You can't deal with regulated forums because you cannot remain civil.

You hang out here because this place is a far right echo chamber. One that allows you to be as rude and insulting as you wish. You can't survive in regulated forums because you cannot remain civil.

I've made a claim that you, because of your lack of civility, cannot remain civil in debate with those who do not share your views. I offered a way to test it and challanged you to post in a bipartisan regulated forum. I said you wouldn't last a week. I stand by that claim.

I guess i should discount this forum because the first post i read here was by reason10? Look, If you're afraid to post there, i understand. Not everyone can be civil to others.

Ill give all yall the benefit of the doubt. It's my contention that you are incapable of remaining civil in the face of a diverse range of posters. Register at www.debatepoliltics.com. You wont last a week.

Youve confused insults with constructive reasoning. And it has nothing to do with which side your on. The rules are the same for both sides. You simply are incapable of the self control necessary to perform in a regulated forum. You are sitting there trying to convince me that being a rude, obstinate, insulting degrading bully is the only way for you to get your point across. Thats not how those in a civilized society act. Its how animals act.

You are not capable of honest debate. You dont have the self control to keep things civil. Its why your here. Because your angry, uncontrolled rhetoric is not conducive to constructive debate and youd be banned elsewhere. You are incapable of controlling yourself.

By "honest" you mean as long as the poster agrees with you. And all yall call yourself Christians? For all yalls sake, you better hope god doesnt exist. If only you had the where with all to recognise that the way you express yourself through anger is problematic. But you dont. So your incapable of growth. And your incapable of learning. https://christianscholars.com/blessing-for-insult-in-todays-argument-culture-seriously/

Repolitics doesnt regulate direct insults. That is problematic in as much as it allows threads to devolve into puddles of insults, vicious tangents of verbal degradation. Real, constructive debate cannot florish in this type of environment.

Come over to www.debatepolitics.com They don't allow the bullies to run roughshod over there.

Donald has a problem with being wrong. https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.nbcnews.com/video/trump-if-biden-is-elected-the-stock-market-will-crash-94451269581&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjw1L7_hdaEAxUhJkQIHYviDFwQtwJ6BAgGEAE&usg=AOvVaw14YABcCZU49_cLUl0Viiff

You may want to turn the abusive rhetoric down then.