robosmith
-
Posts
10,631 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by robosmith
-
-
8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:
Alternate electors is not illegal and has been used before by people like JFK. In fact, had JFK not had alternate electors, he never would have been president.
Never has there been an alternate elector slate fraudulently claiming to valid AFTER the vote count was certified until Trump.
-
8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:
You clearly don't know what a soft coup is. But that's OK. We all have knowledge gaps. A soft coup is when the government is seized through illegal means, but not by force.
Have you googled "contingent election" yet? LMAO
-
13 hours ago, Nationalist said:
No they were not "scrubbing blood off the floor" on the 23rd.
Man you just lie constantly don't you.
Because you imagine the woman who was shot didn't bleed?
And ALSO all the cops who were beaten with weapons like fire extinguishers?
It is YOU who LIES CONSTANTLY.
13 hours ago, Nationalist said:Ya...a brave cop shot an unarmed woman who happened to be a military veteran.
You're full of sh1t.!
Who had just broken down the door to illegally enter the House chambers soon to be followed by a violent mob.
You've stated yourself you would shoot ANYONE breaking down YOUR DOOR.
-
13 hours ago, User said:
No, my argument has been expecting you to actually articulate some kind of real logical and rational reason for why you call it a coup.
Your argument has continually boiled down to: Its a coup because its a coup!
Just brilliant.
So, back to the same obvious question I asked you before and caught you in... its so obviously a coup, that he is not being taken to court for any such related charges.
Clearly, it is not that obvious after all.
I am no more speculating on the outcome than you are with your fear mongering about how if Pence did what was asked of him then that would have been the end! We are off script and have no clue what to do next!
Yeah, sure. This is the same dumb stuff we hear about the rioting on January 6th. Like it was a game of capture the flag, only if the QAnon Shaman held onto the Chamber for another hour would he have been declared Emperor of America, and we all would have had to play along.
Your kind of devotion to the pablum of "its a coup because its a coup" might be a big hit with the left-wing types at the local Democratic Socialist meetings... but when you start putting that garbage on a public forum, you need to be better prepared to explain it.It's a coup because it was a PLAN to ILLEGALLY disrupt the EC vote count with violence and ILLEGALLY force a contingent election.
Look that up and inform YOURSELF.
-
21 hours ago, Nationalist said:
There was no coup. You should stop lying now. You look ridiculous.
You look like what you are: a completely IGNORANT viewer of FOS LIES.
14 hours ago, Nationalist said:Hodad...your continuous harping about the insurrection that wasn't is tiring and a complete lie.
No "political party" hunted anyone.
No politician hunted anyone.
Your constant attempts to force a square peg in a round hole is ridiculous.
As are you.
Thanks for demonstrating the IGNORANCE of FOS LIES once AGAIN.
-
On 4/25/2024 at 5:37 AM, Nationalist said:
You're warped. Trump did nothing to "scare" Pence. You can scream "SOFT COUP" all you like. It's nothing but a warped joke.
Trump scared Pence by getting his goons to erect a gallows on the steps of the Capitol and an armed mob to chase him down. Unfortunate that FOS LIES didn't report that to you.
On 4/25/2024 at 3:03 PM, Nationalist said:Sally...Trump did not refuse the peaceful transfer of power. On the 23rd, the power transfer happened without a hitch.
You need to stop lying so regularly.
ONLY AFTER his COUP ATTEMPT FAILED. Duh
-
On 4/24/2024 at 10:41 AM, User said:
I see. So pursuing specious legal theories that are found not to be legal... is an attempt to seize power and a coup!
I look forward to our finally locking Al Gore up for his unconstitutional (illegal) attempts to overturn the 2000 election. His conspiracy to defraud the United States went unpunished.
So again... why isn't Trump being charged with something that serious if it was so obvious?
Biden knew what he was doing with Student Loans was not Constitutional and he did it anyway... Obama knew what he was doing with DACA was not Constitutional and he did it anyway... on and on and on...Gore went to court, LOST, and complied with their decision.
Trump went to court 60+ times, LOST and decided to send a mob to the Capitol to disrupt the EC vote count. Duh
The former: LEGAL. The LATTER: attempted coup.
On 4/24/2024 at 12:15 PM, Nationalist said:Go fck urself Libbie.
Your accusations are dumb and obviously desperate.
Your responses are 100% vacuous as usual. AKA BANKRUPT.
-
On 4/24/2024 at 8:12 AM, WestCanMan said:
If you want them to keep their reputation then express hatred for them. Your vote of confidence is slander here.
I can tell you have NO IDEA what their reputation is. It is completely independent of MY EVALUATION. Duh
-
On 4/24/2024 at 3:52 AM, Nationalist said:
A soft coup. LOL...
Did Trump try to have the military deployed to protect the government? Yes.
No, he did NOT.
On 4/24/2024 at 3:52 AM, Nationalist said:Did he tell the crowd to go peacefully protest? Yes.
And also told them to "fight like hell" and they knew which he WANTED.
On 4/24/2024 at 3:52 AM, Nationalist said:Did he ask the crowd to stop rioting? Yes.
Yes, AFTER BLOCKING the EC certification FAILED.
On 4/24/2024 at 3:52 AM, Nationalist said:The only softness here is between your ears...or legs...or both.
I can tell you're speaking from PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. LMAO
On 4/24/2024 at 6:38 AM, Deluge said:Yes, it is editable, just like Wikipedia is. So in that case, you have to roll your sleeves up and actually verify the sources.
You see, pervert, you can't simply rely on what's being said on the news. At least 90% of what's being televised is left-wing propaganda, so that means you have to actually read and verify sources.
Did the democrats cheat in the 2020 election? You bet your ass they did; taking a good look at the piece of shit occupying the White House right now is enough to tell you that the election was rigged.
Go through the sources; if you don't do that then I will help you.
You have NO IDEA what constitutes EVIDENCE. AKA NOT YOUR OPINION.
-
On 4/23/2024 at 9:55 PM, User said:
No, it certainly is not a coup.
For it being so certain, with all the different court cases against Trump, you might think one of them might be regarding a coup. I guess it is not so certain after all.
The best Jack smith could come up with is a real contortion of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Big eye roll there. Trump "conspired" to defraud the United States in as much as Al Gore did.
And he didn't pressure Pence to appoint him President. The Vice President doesn't even have that power. Eastman drafted up a pretty convoluted memo for a chain of events to take place that would never have worked, even if Pence went along with it.
He clearly pressured Pence to ILLEGALLY refuse to certify the EC votes and return the decision to the state legislatures cause a contingent election would make him POTUS.
But ONLY by illegally disenfranchising millions of voters.
You should google "contingent election" cause you are obviously ignorant about that.
You are right about one thing: Eastman agreed that his plan would never get past the SCOTUS.
-
On 4/23/2024 at 9:25 PM, User said:
I did not question your source. I have no interest in folks who post a link without adding commentary about what they want to share specifically from it.
I already told you it is evidence of the insurrection on Jan 6th. It's the easy version.
There's also the final report from the Select Jan 6th Commision Hearing.
If you don't at least watch the video, that is YOUR CHOICE to remain IGNORANT of the EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE.
For the record, I believe the SWORN TESTIMONY of WH INSIDERS detailed in the video
On 4/23/2024 at 9:25 PM, User said:I am here discussing this with you, and you have already proven you will balk at someone thinking you believe something you shared and play games. So... if there was something specific you wanted to point out, lets see it.
I already told you I don't have to believe an ENTIRE ARTICLE TO POST IT HERE.
You CLEARLY don't even want to discuss it, cause YOU FAILED TO DO SO.
-
On 4/23/2024 at 7:42 PM, Deluge said:
LOTS of credibility.
Your side is guilty as f*ck.
Thanks for not disputing that ANYONE can edit it and write whatever they want.
-
16 minutes ago, User said:
And what is meant by saying we are a Christian nation?
Christian nation means different things to different people. Some believe we are bound by laws detailed in the Bible. New Testament, of course, since that is post Christ.
16 minutes ago, User said:That can mean many things and is a very common saying among folks in regard to our country being predominately Christian.
Thinking such and saying such and wanting such is not a violation of the 1st Amendment at all.Depends on who you are and whether you have the POWER to implement it. If you're JoSCOTUS, ruling against the 1st Amendment, violates it.
-
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:
Oh she absolutely took delight in the white guy being unjustlynprosecuted.
That is just YOUR ASSumption. Like everyone outside of the MAGA CULT, she knows about the extensive EVIDENCE justifying the prosecution as decided by the GJ.
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:To her, she was winning this battle in a race war.
Has nothing to do with race outside of the satisfaction that some blacks are finally in a position of power which was LONG DENIED ALL OF THEM.
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:Trump never performed any racial oppression.
You obviously don't know his history. Google Trump racial discrimination in rental and Trump racial discrimination Central Park Five
In any case, Reid referenced Trump's cronies, NOT Trump himself. Duh
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:In fact, under Trump, blacks so the greatest gains in wage and unemployment gaps. Trump undid Joe Biden's racist prison reform and was applauded by former Obama staffer Van Jones. It took Biden undoing opportunity zones that Trump created to help minorities to achieve greater economic success. And lo and behold the wage and unemployment gaps returned. Go figure.
No evidence of ^this. Your mere claims are hollow and gratuitous.
-
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:
No. You have equal rights. Nothing guarantees your ability to exercise them.
If you can't exercise your rights, they are meaningless.
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:I have the right to own a gun. Doesn't mean the government has to give me one.
There are many other ways to own a gun. Duh
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:I habe the right to free speech. Doesn't mean anyone has to listen.
Now you're just making up shit. You have free speech and everyone else has the freedom to ignore you.
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:Rights are things you can do. Whether or not you can achieve them is up to you.
People listening to you has nothing to do with your freedom to spout bullshit.
-
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:
Do you want to try again and maybe address what I actually said rather than this weird strawman argument you concocted?
Do you want to answer my question? What does it MEAN TO YOU?
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:Equal privileges? Who said anything about equal privileges? And where did money come into this? I was talking about equality. Equality isn't an outcome. Equality is a process.
Equality can mean many different things. What does "equality of process" mean to you?
-
3 hours ago, West said:
Joe Biden puts evangelicals on notice then starts levying massive fines 30x the normal. Forgive me for not giving him the benefit of the doubt
There's no doubt if you actually discover the details. Duh
QuoteGrand Canyon University Fined $37.7M for 'Lies' to Students. The university, which has been locked in a years-long battle with the Education Department, vowed to fight back. Grand Canyon University misled students about how much a doctoral dissertation program cost, the Education Department found.Nov 1, 2023 -
5 hours ago, West said:
Biden vowed to take out "Christian nationalism" in his SOTU address. What that is nobody can define it.
It's clearly the idea that we are a Christian nation; which is explicitly prohibited by the 1st amendment and something Republicons have a hard on for establishing. Duh
Which you might know if you were an American and not so IGNORANT.
-
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:
Are you through making an a55 of yourself...again...?
Certainly ^YOU are not.
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:What inequities do you see?
Inequities are very different from inequalities under discussion. Duh
Equity is results like the equity you have in your house; equality is opportunity.
1 hour ago, Legato said:Biden was prattling about white supremacists back in 2021. He must have meant those whites currently protesting at the colleges. That's okay. they're his white supremacists.
No he was talking about the neo-Nazis marching in Charlottesville. WTH are you talking about?
-
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:
Yes, I dispute that there are inequalities. I believe that all men, women and children are created equal.
What does that mean to you? Just because the DoI says that, does not mean there is ANY basis in the law for it.
The law is the Constitution and CODES. No one cites the DoI when they're in court.
It is OBVIOUS that you and I do not have equal privileges with Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk.
And few have EQUAL opportunities as those born to great wealth.
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:The fact that you don't, proves my point.
I believe that the DoI says ALL MEN have equal rights under the law. Children certainly DON'T.
And women are getting there. There is a saying in US law that goes: "Defendants have all the due process they can afford." That means UNEQUAL rights under the law.
For example, people like yourself say Trump is not a criminal because he's never been convicted of a crime, completely ignoring that he uses wealth to manipulate the justice system is ways unavailable to the average Joe.
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:It is also why I say you lack all self awareness. Littering your post with personal attacks does nothing to disprove or discredit anything I said.
Pointing out where you make no sense is not a personal attack, it a FACT that you make mistakes. You post beliefs and claim they are observations, but contain NO FACTS you claim to have observed.
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:But the excuses that you made for Joy Reid are just embarrassing. What she said was not a celebration of skin color.
In a way, they are. Blacks have a LONG HISTORY of UNEQUAL RIGHTS under the law here. It is RACIAL PROGRESS that they are gaining opportunities LONG DENIED due to skin color.
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:What she said was pure, unadulterated hatred that was based primarily on Trump's skin color. Apparently she hates tangelos with yellow hair?
She said NOTHING about Trump's skin color, ^this is just DRIVEL.
What she mentioned was RACIAL OPPRESSION policies promoted by Trump cronies like Stephon Miller.
-
29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:
Your lack of self awareness is so fruitful for me.
First, you say my observations are beliefs as if your observations are facts..
You posted ONLY BELIEFS with NO OBSERVATIONS.
Are you STILL disputing that inequalities exist? Why?
29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:AND...you do it in a thread that addresses left wing hypocrisy. That's just gold right there. Bravo.
You've not demonstrated hypocrisy, ONLY STATED YOUR BELIEFS.
29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:Second, you said (very angrily I might add) that there are obvious inequalities
ANYONE can SEE inequalities, except it seems for you. They ARE obvious.
29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:(presumably for superficial characteristics like race, sex, religion, etc) to counter that I said the left uses superficial characteristics like sex, race and religion to create justification for hatred. I mean seriously, what more could you have done to prove my point?
I said NOTHING which proves your point.
Nothing about superficial characteristics nor hatred.
You made PRESUMPTIONS AGAIN.
29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:Finally, I don't have to believe it is the intent of the left to use superficial characteristics to drive their hatred, though that is the logical conclusion. I can merely post videos of them saying they hate people for superficial reasons:
That is YOUR BELIEF that the REASONS are "superficial."
How about you explain YOUR case that your videos show "hatred" for superficial reasons.
Joy Reid is celebrating the PROGRESS made by black people prosecuting those who advocate their OPPRESSION.
Are you claiming the OPPRESSION of qualified blacks is "superficial" ? AKA means nothing or doesn't exist.
-
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
Trump said that war would end on day 1 of his presidency. Not that he wouldn't fund it.
Stop lying you greasy little leftist.
Same for you. Let us know if Trump disputes Orban's attribution.
It is clear that the only way Trump can end the war in 24 hours is SURRENDER to Putin.
-
6 hours ago, User said:
Is this a joke? Just be honest enough to admit you were wrong. Trump made no "announcement." This is second-hand information that Trump and his campaign have not said or confirmed.
Also, if you listen to Victor Orban, he said Trump has detailed plans to end the war as well. So, even if you want to believe his accounting of any conversations is 100% accurate, it would mean that Trumps notion of not funding Ukraine would only be because he negotiated a peace deal to end the war.
Either way... this whole thread by you is less than honest. Be Better.
Trump has STATED he would end the war in 24 hours. And he's NOT contradicted what Orban attributed to him in any way.
In FACT cutting off funding for Ukraine is an OBVIOUS way to end the war in 24 hours.
Let us know IF he does dispute what Orban said. Until then, I stand by my undisputed claim.
-
10 hours ago, Nationalist said:
I post my opinions and draw those opinions from what I see.
Live with it.
Why can't you answer my simple questions. I asked you nothing about the source of your OPINIONS.
We already know how skewed they are by "what you see," because your cognitive dissonance is a really strong FILTER and your sources are PROVEN LIARS.
Trump’s Donor Base Is Shrinking
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted
"can" being the key word. It DOESN'T MEAN "WILL."
Small donors are getting tired of paying Trump's LAWYERS.
Really? What "financial skin"? Trump's tax cut was mostly for 1% and large corporations.
The TCJA 2 Years Later: Corporations, Not Workers, Are the Big Winners