robosmith
-
Posts
10,889 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by robosmith
-
-
1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:
I agree with Musk. Freedom of speech is important.
Musk has been caught several times infringing on X users' freedom of speech.
He's a HYPOCRITE: "freedom of speech for me, but not for thee."
1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:Now, that does not free the neo-nazi from consequences. If folks stop working with him.. its of his own doing. If he posts threats and violent content and it can be shown that he posted his intent to commit a crime.. again its of his own doing.
When he knows Fuentes posts that he is willing to commit serious crimes, giving him his platform to spread such hate and incitement could easily make Musk a co-conspirator in any crimes committed.
-
1 hour ago, taxme said:
If you value freedom of speech at all then you must accept all opinions from whomever is out there. I despise liberals and communists but they have the right to have their opinion and to their freedom of speech. You obviously despise Elon Musk for his belief in freedom of speech for all. Even Nazi leaders should have the right to their opinion.
Musk has brought back a little more freedom of speech to social media. I know that conservative opinions and points of view being allowed to be heard on X is so repulsive to you, but then again, who really gives a crap about what you think.
Lefty liberals like you hate conservatives and their right to freedom of speech.
PS: If i were of a German background, i would take offence and be really offended and insulted by people like you to be using the word Nazi. Maybe some German people here should take anyone to the human rights commission for using the word Nazi. Just my opinion of course. 😇
Just your completely IRRATIONAL OPINION. I am of German background. Duh
FWIW, most of Europe, including Germany, is further left than US right wingers.
YOU make a lot of ACCUSATIONS which are nothing but BULLSHIT, TROLL.
-
46 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:
That wasn't what was stated/implied.
What was known at the time was that Ukraine and the US were - to paraphrase - 'working to protect humans from natural and man-made pathogens' in those labs, and those labs did contain Russian bioweapons when they were seized.
Sounds grand and ethically principled, but "making cures and countermeasures to defend against bioweapons" also means that you can unleash them yourself. It's just as aggressive as creating bioweapons, maybe even moreso.
You can ONLY unleash them yourself, if you manufacture them in the LARGE quantities required for dispersal.
Small quantities needed for countermeasure development are NOT weapons. Duh
-
6 hours ago, Nationalist said:
LOL.
Gettin' even more desperate than normal eh?
It's over li'l guy. Brandon is toast.
I didn't write the report, lDIOT. But YOU wrote ^this desperate fantasy response. LMAO
-
6 hours ago, Perspektiv said:
You throw up an awful lot. Maybe consider a doctor?
This is coming from someone who dated someone who struggled with an eating disorder.
Here's a secret for you: it's an emoji, NOT a health report. Duh
-
3 hours ago, West said:
Considering the drug cartels have waged war on the American people by murdering them thru hard drugs. While Democrats applaud and do nothing to stop the assault
Users kill themselves by taking very dangerous chances with deadly drugs.
Never trust drugs bought from an UNKNOWN source.
2 hours ago, -TSS- said:In the 80s the Soviet Union was ridiculed for having senile zombies as their leaders but actually Breznev was 75 when he died, Adnropov 69 and Chernenko 77. All of them younger than Trump and Biden now. I was surprised to learn that. I thought all of them were at least 10 years older.
Growing up in the USSR was probably a much more physically demanding existence.
-
Elon Musk Promises to Lift X Ban on Neo-Nazi Leader
QuoteControversial billionaire and X owner, Elon Musk, vowed to allow avowed neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes back onto his platform on Thursday. Fuentes, the leader of the so-called Groyper Army, has been banned from the platform since 2021 and is infamous for his violent and bigoted rhetoric.
Fuentes is known for fusing violent imagery into his neo-Nazi tirades. In January, he vowed to kill if Trump asked him to.
“I am a soldier for Donald Trump. I am part of, I serve at the personal pleasure of Donald Trump, my supreme leader. I am part of the paramilitary wing of the Trump movement. I am part of the Revolutionary Guard. I do not answer to the Pentagon. I do not answer to the civilian government. I answer. I am the pretorian guard of Donald Trump. If Donald Trump ordered me to do an extrajudicial killing, I would perform it,” Fuentes said.
Musk replied to an X user who noted allowing Fuentes back would cause an “enormous backlash,” saying: "Fate loves irony, but hates hypocrisy. I cannot claim to be a defender of free speech, but then permanently ban someone who hasn’t violated the law, no matter how much I disagree with what they say. This will probably cause us to lose a lot of advertisers and makes me sad, but a principle is a principle."Apparently Musk doesn't know that conspiring to kill ANYONE is a crime. And Fuentes is ADVERTISING his availability as a hitman. 🤮
-
New Poll Reveals Real Dividing Line Between Abortion Supporters and Opponents
Quote"Across nearly every faith and in all but five states, a majority of Americans support at least some access to abortion." That’s a major conclusion of a new massive survey of 22,000 people from the Public Religion Research Institute.”
But the survey’s most revealing insight is the group in which anti-abortion sentiment remains strongest: white Christian nationalists.
Also important: “In the seven battleground states that are expected to define the presidential race—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—a collective 64% of residents say abortion should be legal in all or most cases.”^The swing issue which will drive Democratic TURNOUT. AKA, women who hate Trump for depriving them of their RIGHTS.
-
Inside RFK Jr.’s Chaotic White House Bid
QuoteAides describe a cult like environment in which dysfunction reigns and top aides focus on elevating their own profiles.
-
Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders
QuoteIf he wins a second term in November, Donald Trump wants to covertly deploy American assassination squads into Mexico soon after he’s sworn into office again, according to three people who’ve discussed the matter with the former U.S. president.
Both during and after his presidency, the presumptive 2024 Republican nominee has floated different ideas for bombing or invading Mexico in response to the American fentanyl crisis and to ‘wage WAR’ on notorious drug cartels. As president, Trump even thought it was possible to bomb the cartels’ drug labs, and then potentially pin the strikes on another country, according to his former defense secretary, Mark Esper.Of course, any of ^these actions would be considered an ACT OF WAR against Mexico, but Trump is probably completely IGNORANT of that.
-
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
But it's all so sensational! How can they help themselves?
Small things amuse small minds, and gossip, smears, allegations are right up their alley.
No leftist in the last ten years ever saw an allegation against a conservative that they didn't start repeating right away.
How would you know ^this? Cause you believe you're OMNISCIENT? LMAO
I've seen plenty of "allegations against a conservative" that I never mentioned to anyone.
Doing what you describe would be a FULL TIME JOB and def not worth the effort.
I stick with those which are only momentus enough to POSSIBLY change peoples' minds.
I have barely even begun reading the 30,000+ lies attributed to Trump. Maybe a dozen, no more.
-
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
So why do you always find your self arguing with conservatives? That obviously didn't end well, did it... 😉
Can you name an argument that you won?
Were the riots peaceful? Was Jussie really lynched? Were there any 'gentle giants'? Did anyone ever get found guilty of colluding with Russians? Was Trudeau really a solid, capable guy? Was Biden?
Leftard arguments of the past ten years are just a sad collection of embarrassments.
ONLY in YOUR MIND. Cause you NEVER admit you're wrong even when the EVIDENCE is overwhelming.
You always just wipe the evidence from your memory as if it was never seen.
-
25 minutes ago, Hodad said:
What you say is false. The judge sided with the defense objections most of the time during Daniels' testimony and he even curtailed her story multiple times with his own objections.
Perhaps the defense should have offered more objections if they thought her testimony was irrelevant and unduly presidential. That's their job, and Merchan clearly was sympathetic. Instead they just let it happen and whined about it afterward. Sort of like Daniels.
I think the defense let it get out of hand in order to try to justify the mistrial.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:
Lets start Jack Smith got caught manipulating the evidence in the Trump documents case and admitted it.
Yes, let's start with ^this joke and see you explain how not putting papers back in boxes in the same order changes the evidence of Trump's crime of obstruction of justice and him LYING about not having evidence he had HIDDEN.
I won't hold my breath.
-
On 5/7/2024 at 7:09 AM, WestCanMan said:
The lower one's IQ is, the more likely they are to be upset about the fact that Biden didn't get to add 4 more SC justices. No joke: If your IQ is below 70...
^Sorry, YOU are NOT the arbiter of indicators of low IQ, cause you're only average.
Only very high IQ knows enough to make a judgement on low IQ, cause low IQ doesn't know WHAT they don't know.
-
On 5/6/2024 at 5:43 PM, User said:
No, we have checks and balances in place. Trump has to be elected and Congress would have to support him. When you bring such politically motivated specious charges... you are not going to win over people or Congress.
And when you start a thread complaining about how the DOJ is not charging Biden, I will believe you have a care in the world about injustice.
The system is designed just fine.
Calling me names doesn't make your case any better here.There is no EVIDENCE of criminal wrongdoing by Biden. The House has tried repeatedly to find SOMETHING and FAILED.
And YOU don't have ANY, EITHER, but stupidly pretend that you do.
-
2 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:
The vilest of agendas is weaponizing the DoJ because you can't win based on your record.
"weaponizing the DoJ" is merely YOUR CLAIM without EVIDENCE.
The STRONG evidence is against Trump in all the indictments and trials if his judicial appointments ever let them take place.
Of course you're unaware of the extent of that evidence because you only see FOS LIES.
IF you want to know the TRUTH, see Frontline's "Democracy on Trial."
-
20 hours ago, West said:
Good read from the Blaze. Far left throwing out slurs to continue their vile agenda
The vilest of agendas is overthrowing an election based on LIES.
Your religious arguments have no place in a nonsectarian legal framework.
-
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:
Classic anti-anti-communist.
Biden has cognitive decline and the reaction is defensive. Kennedy has cognitive decline to a lesser degree and the reaction is offensive.
The key is that they have to defend the hive. Contradictions aren't contradictions to them.
The key is your amateur OPINION as to greater or lesser degree means NOTHING.
And I'll give you a REASON: RFK Jr has no proof that vaccines do more harm than good, but delusionally believes he knows they do more harm despite EXPERTS saying they don't. Obviously the cognitive decline of delusion.
-
53 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
It's not enough to say you can't PROVE fraud - you need to be able to prove there was no fraud
You poor naive child; because it is impossible to prove a negative:
Why is it impossible to prove a negative?The source of the fallacy is the assumption that something is true unless proven otherwise. The person making a negative claim cannot logically prove nonexistence. And here's why: to know that a X does not exist would require a perfect knowledge of all things (omniscience).is on the person challenging the OFFICIAL RESULTS.
No proof of fraud means all you have is the CERTIFIED VOTE COUNT. Duh
-
17 hours ago, WestCanMan said:
Right, just don't answer any of the questions and you don't get any egg on your face.
EVERYTHING I have is bigger than "Dominion voting machines" by several orders of magnitude.
CNN incited riots with their BS narratives, and people were killed. Communities were destroyed. The damage from the M Brown narrative alone was far worse than Jan 6th.
I believe Fox news because even when someone like Sean Hannity says something that sounds crazy, like "FBI agents are lying to the FISA court, Andrew McCabe will be fired this week, or FBI agents are altering evidence", those things end up happening (the firings) or being proven in court (FBI lies and crimes).
How much of CNN's Russian collusion BS ever turned out to be true? How many times did "new bombshell evidence" come out? 50? 20? Zero?
The correct answer is zero. No one ever found any evidence that Trump colluded with Russians. We just found out that the FBI are liars and criminals.
What I want to hear is you acknowledging that CNN lies. Because we both know that they do, and they do it a lot.
CNN, like all legitimate news sources, publishes RETRACTIONS when they get a story wrong.
They've even fired managers and reporters for violating THEIR professional journalist ETHICAL STANDARDS.
Name ONE TIME FOS LIES has ever published a retraction that was NOT ordered by LOSING a LAWSUIT.
FOS LIES a PROPAGANDA outlet, which is why EXCLUSIVE FOS LIES VIEWERS (like you) are so IGNORANT.
And YOU keep parroting that "Russia collusion" is a LIE, while IGNORING STRONG EVIDENCE like the conclusions of the Republican led US Senate Intel Committee. IOW you are a JOKE.
-
3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
No I'm saying it's a non-issue that Democrats appear to turn into a weapon.
RFK Jr thought his cognitive decline was an issue in his divorce according to his OWN TESTIMONY.
-
Just now, Nationalist said:
What "science"?
Masks?
Gawd you're an 1diot.
You're such an lDIOT that you don't understand that masks filtering out viruses is SCIENCE and has been PUBLISHED in peer reviewed journals.
I'll bet you've never even READ ONE. LMAO
by J Howard · 2021 · Cited by 1194 — The preponderance of evidence indicates that mask wearing reduces transmissibility per contact by reducing transmission of infected respiratory particles in ...by AA Chughtai · 2020 · Cited by 198 — Until a cloth mask design is proven to be equally effective as a medical or N95 mask, wearing cloth masks should not be mandated for healthcare workers. In ...Effectiveness of face masks for reducing transmission ...
by L Boulos · 2023 · Cited by 13 — Despite the ROB, and allowing for uncertain and variable efficacy, we conclude that wearing masks, wearing higher quality masks (respirators), ... -
19 hours ago, Legato said:
Bad taste? Yes.
How has Trump been involved in increasing the ductility of steel Is it something to do with the Steele dossier?
^Bad pun? Yes. And TROLLING.
Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted
The opioid and fentanyl crisis were just as bad during Trump's admin.
Actually opioid was worse during COVID.