Modest

Yes. It is my fault. We evolved. I never doubted actually. Not so much as you like to think, in my opinion, but it is fact: we evolved.

Nothing new, my dear . . . Fact is that doesn't happen. And that doesn't happen because the system is bad and broken. The model it is not adapted to the human nature. That's the fact. The fact that vast majority is insured it is not enough to avoid the shameful fact that 40 000 people die each year for not having medical coverage.

Shady, where exactly have I ever argued that today we live worse lives than our ancestors did 500 yr ago ?

You pick only the facts you like, and using them conclude preposterously. Did islam kill as many people like Western "world wars" or ideologies like liberalism (colonialism), nazism and marxism ? The 70 000 deaths in the opioid crisis of only the last year in USA, it is also the fault of the victims? Or maybe for that yearly massacre the pharmaceutical companies that advertised aggressively and put pressure on physicians in a broken and immoral system, have some responsibility ????

I already gave the reference: The Black Book of Womenès Condition by Christine Ockrent. No, people choose not to get health insurance in USA because there lacks the system that already all the civilized Western (and Estern) countries have. Even though it’s widely available, and very inexpensive if you start when you’re young, the economic system put pressure on them to spend on gadgets by ads and pair pressure and conformity. The same people made to live in other country than US, would survive, despite their stupid buyer choices. Your apology is ridiculous.

A stupid, fascist, racist and elitist guy like Trump would have never been elected if the system (liberal democracy and capitalism) would have not pushed the White people toward a future as a minority. Maybe there is people that can seriously think that the Whites are superior to other races, or that they deserve to be other races masters. I think that someone has to be very, very, very stupid to believe that. Such very, very, very stupid people unavoidably are very, very, very rare and far between. In contrast, there is White people that understand that they are condemned to be swamped by other races, and in North America unfortunately by the most ugly race on earth, and that is disturbing. They are silenced, they are derided, they are stupidly attacked and humiliated by other people that have no more brain than heart, and that is letting the pressure just increase.

Chinese bolshevics kill people by fire squad. Thousands each year. Chinese budhists and Indian hindus killed in the half century hundreds of million women by selective abortion and neglect of baby girls after birth. Each one for RELIGIOUS reasons . . . The Americans condemn some 40 000 people to dye each year for not having medical insurance. And you dare to tell me that the world evolved. And that islam is the worse thing humankind has today. Are you serious ?

Yes, you are right globally. If you admit that not all muslims, not all islamic countries are as bigoted as some or a majority of them are, that is pretty OK from my point of view. You seem to think that the fact that muslims grow fast in our population is dangerous. And from what you said above and what I admit it is true, that makes sense. Unfortunately only SUPERFICALLY. What it is the point to maintain our laws and customs, which condemned us to be replaced by africans or arabs ? If we, as people, we are not so precious to be preserved, WHY should the ideas we died and have got extinct for, be saved ?????????????????????? You seem to be in the old and ridiculous paradigm that says "sacrificing people to save ideas, rather than sacrificing ideas to save people." I for one prefer to take a look at how the muslims now and our ancestors yesterday made possible to make a society sustainable demographically, in order to give our children a chance to be. Ideas ? Ideologies ? No matter how humanistic, rational or morally they are, as long as they condemn ME to extinction, I dont give a damn shit about them !

Actually I dont like them shaved.

Yes, english is my third (actually fourth) language. Please read The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering by Norman Finkelstein, in order to understand that criticising Jews is not always and automatically anti-semitism. You seem to suggest that all the people on earth can be criticised except jews. Useless to tell you that is stupid as idea. Please define islamophile before pasting this label on me. I know very well that some of the jewish ethics of the Old Testament seem to have been repelled by Jesus, but fact is that the same Jesus made from other points of view the old testament ethos worse: the idea of punishment after death is one of this: the old tribal god of the jews was happy in the old testament to kill his enemies. The new god of the new testament is more cruel: he put his torture chamber where someone cannot escape simply by dying or being killed. If one is to believe the stupid and cruel doctrine of christianity (islam and rabinic judaism too) called eternal punishment, one is supposed to accept that death cannot end the punishment you get, deserved or not. The doctrine was accepted and promoted by Jesus, unfortunately. The mere fact that the OT is still part of the Christian Bible it is significant and has effects that are far to be minor - all too frequently some christians re-read these dogmas and ideas in their Bible and want to punish and discriminate others (homosexuals, people of other religions, women, etc.).

"Proud Conservative" you made me laugh a lot ! You read my comments a bit, have got furious and that darkened all your brain. Otherwise one would never conclude that I am muslim, or that I support the idea that covering girls in bags, especially when they are so beautiful as the oriental arab girls are (I actually support the idea that it is useful to cover in a burka the ugly young girls of North America, which in a good percentage are muzzle-faced (maxillary prognathism). I see as barbaric and heartless all the muslim traditions related to the prudishness or modesty. What I am though enough lucid to admit is only that due to these religious and patriarchal traditions their women breed enough so that they supply the manque à gagner made by the barrenness of our women, so that our broken society to continue to function. And about that you should think too, if there is any brain power left after your last crisis of fury: taking the traditions of muslims of today, or reverting to our own traditions that reclaim our ownership over our women, that is the only solution to avoid the replacement by the most ugly humans on earth. I would have very much liked to see that the rational humanist liberalism of our succeed to make us free, happy but also durable in time. It failed. It not even tried to. The reality, the biology made the human species dependent of their women in order to survive as community. To forfeit women, the West showed the world, mean to forfeit a future in which you are still present in any relevant number or quantity. That's it, that's all. To conclude, you dont have to show me pictures of the beautiful southern and oriental girls - I am flooded culturally speaking in my Eastern European country in which I was born by this cliché of the beautiful black-haired or black-eyed girl. The most popular song EVER in Russian (smuglianka moldavanka - smoggy or smoky moldavian girl, cмуглянка Молдаванка) speaks about such a girl, that bewitch the Russian young guy, and this song is still played in chinese language or in korean). Ochi Chernye (black eyes), Karie Glaza (regard noir, I dont know how to translate it better in english), Ya Chernyava, as meny songs about the exotic beauty of the women of Asia. Where you found this idea that I am not happy with the way your girls dress ??? The problems with your girls is that where I live at least, they are awfully ugly, because half of them are negresses in the young cohorts. Thatès Canada view from Montreal !

Well, then you admit that killing 10 000 or 15 000, or 100 000 or 1 000 000 is a bad thing to do, and was done by many, your ancestors too, and to quantify the horror is something that only the jews like to make, and for a (profitable albeit immoral) reason. You need to define what "backward" mean to you. And you have to notice that countries like Bosnia or Albania, Lebanon or Tunisia, grant women and men, muslims and non-muslims equal rights, or at least are not as socially conservatives (or backward, to cite you) as the other Islamic countries. Before asserting that I have little understanding of what Christianity is, you have to prove it. For instant the only one that seem to fail to know something relevant of the Christian religion is you: you didnt know that Leviticus is a legal code, and that many other parts of Christian and Jewish Bible are also. There is no confusion here . . . As for progressive and atheist me that use video games, I can tell you that the toxic sharks that create and sell this bullshit named video games would all be bankrupt if many people were as a fan of video games as me. Actually if I could, I would ban all video games, or at least restrict their use to adult people. As for being progressive, you would be surprised to learn that I would ban and harshly punish the use and selling of drugs, alcohol and prostitutes, as I would ban and punish the obscene propaganda for homosexuality that one can see in our towns each summer (As I know that they are born screwed and their drives are not an free choice, I believe that homosexuals should have the same rights as the heterosexuals, but once that it is assured I DO NOT WANT TO HEAR THEM OR FROM THEM NOTHING. You cant be proud for being homosexual, anyway not more proud then me. As I don't need to make obscene gestures on the main street to prove how much I am proud of me (??), they also should renounce this aggressive privilege). There is nothing bankrupt in observing that what many muslims are today, we the christians were yesterday in my opinion. It is just fair to admit that. Those concerned with backward zealots, be they christian or muslim zealots, do not have to be concerned at all in Canada, because even if I know that a majority of muslim immigrants here are traditionalists and conservatives in their islamic beliefs, they are not a danger: fundamentalism not equal fanaticism, and fanaticism not equal terrorism. One can promote the other, but not always, to the contrary, rarely. To that I want to make you consider the advantage we have by importing muslims from Middle East, North Africa or South Asia: they make children, which we forgot how to make and raise already for a long time. For the liberal party as the exclusive tool of the business class, it doesn't matter if the hordes of immigrants landing here each year are esthetically speaking at least minimally human-like or simply monsters, because as long as the immigrants are willing to break their backs for less money than the people born here, for the business class it's all OK. Actually it is perfect. You, the conservatives and christian believers, you are completely irrational to attack the muslims immigrants that are the last chance to keep our society from the complete degeneration to which the fanatics of feminism, leftism and liberalism have sentenced us all, for the sake of their stupid masochist victimization. You have to understand that there is no third way or third solution: either you feed continuously the death machine that our model of society and economy is, and we are all disappearing only to let africans inherit our countries and the whole world, or we backtrack from the edge of the cliff and adjust the model so that we make it demographically sustainable again. Or the muslims still know a trick or two about how to make a society sustainable demographically. That mean to forget for a while all the bullshit which the liberals gave us freely to put in our void brains - freedom, equality of sexes, obsesssion with the minorities while the majority is (exclusively) DYING. The muslims still KNOW how to be religious and prolific demographically - there is NO point in being religious and barren. The only thing useful that religion still has to give us is to make fertile again. Christianism, tamed and disfigured by a long civil war with the liberalism forgot how to be alive as a society. The islam still knows, but the danger is that it will degenerate as the christian religion has already - I have many muslims where I work, and what I saw is that the old are still fundamentalists in their mentalities, meanwhile, the young are already brainwashed with all the poison that will make them barren as us are. The hedonism is VERY tempting. Look at Arab world: the only country where the arab spring succeeded is Tunisia, the most liberal and feminist of all of them, and . . . where the women have a fertility that is less than the necessary for maintaining the population. Turkey, a muslim country, already is there: fertility less than 2.1. China, still worse. India on the way to get there where Iran, and Turkey are now, that is countries that have people condemned to be replaced by others. Who are these others ? Well, it is not too difficult to guess - the planet of the apes was not a fiction movie, but a visionary film . . .

I have no problem to admit that a substantial part of the victims in America died in epidemics, but you want to exonerate the mass killings perpetrated by spanish and english in America against the continents population, which is disgraceful. And hilarious in the same time. You are a muslim apologist, only with a cross hanging on his neck, and a big one on his brain.

I am not an islamophil. I dont like islam, and I like not any other religion (although I am culturally an orthodox (eastern) christian. I simply dont like stupidity . . . Islamic countries are as many other cultures of the world still en retard when comparing them with the western world (and not with the christian world, because the blacks in christian africa are as bad as any muslim there). It is what one expect and can easily comprehend. Except you . . .

Oh que oui ! The whole Leviticus is just that. You need a Bible and a lot of time to read it, it seems . . .

Maybe. But that applies also to the islamic world case

Burning at the stake was not reserved only for witches . . . Your only source seems to be Hollywood films or wikipedia.

You suggest that an auto-da-fé which finished in burning at the stake is less harsh as a punishment than stoning to death. And that that makes the christian ethos less traditionalist as an worldview than muslims' one. Or that cutting thieves' hands is more harsh than cutting their ears, or hanging them, as it happened in the christian world. You seem to ignore your own history, and that ignorance makes somehow for a good excuse of your awful ethnocentrism. You try to make muslim conquest and conversion of India appear worse than christian conquest and conversion of America. Fact is that they are very similar, if not with an worse final point for the victims of the christians - there is still 800 milion hindus in "India", which makes for half of all subcontinents' population now, meanwhile there is no more any numerically relevant traditional religion in America. The fact that you do not find an single incitement to stoning in the Koran, but you find many incitements to stoning in the christian (and hebrew) Bible, maybe explains this sad result.

Now about you puking, unfortunately you throw up here the same shit that you mentally was gavaged with: most of the time when you undress a burka girl - any - you are still pleased by what you see. In contrast, camouflage-dressed or naked, the girls that spread ugliness in Canada and in the world breeding like rabbits are. . . well, ugly. The most you can do is to dress them, the more the better. You can de-radicalize islamists, but you cannot un-uglynize the ugliness. If ugliness could be an illness, seeing the speed and the obstinacy with which it is spreading globally, one can think it is cancer.

You fail to consider the fact that islam is comparatively an younger religion - 600 yrs matter. Not a long time ago, the christians had the same traditionalist ethos as the muslims do have today. There was many a civil wars in Christian Europe so that this harsh ethos so typical of a semitic religion is tamed or at least dompted. Just let the internet bullshit for a while, and read the book of Christine Ockrent named The Black Book of Women’s Condition. You will see there that if the muslims subdue harshly their women, at least they do not kill them in such an astronomic number as do the budhists in China, or the hindus in India (sex-choosing before birth, seelctive abortion, neglecting to ilness or to death afterward, or even simply killing the girls).

No, you failed to understand fully what I although did write above: It is fact that a lot of women prefer to be dominated (just look at how normal sex happen, and the fact that the so-called rough sex is spreading exactly when women have more rights and voices than ever: choking, gagging, face-slapping and spitting has become a new fashion. Canada had a very popular guy, a feminist indeed, that made all that to a lot of women (that a lot of time stayed silent) without any punishment...), and it is what one can expect from them as the less strong half of the humankind. Biology rules... But I do not think and nor said that they like to be raped. Or that they like to not have human rights and some freedom. Of course they do like such things... As I said above, they want that and it is comprehensible to want it, but that doesnt mean they can be happy when getting all these rights. Otherwise there would not have been such a crash of the institution of family in the Western world, and nor would have these women a fertility rate of less than 1.3 . . . Just consider the unbelievable quantity of idiotic Western women that did go with islamists in Syria and Irak to live in the most cruel and patriarchalist model of society. These women were searching for a lost normality not to be found in the Western liberal societies. If you like it or not, the reality is there: the western women which have the most rights of any other group of women on earth, are barren and their societies are dying because of that. In no society and in no age women were so mentally disturbed and in search of treatment for that as it is the case today in the Western world . . . No, I am not an incel: I am married, I have a child, 20 yrs old. I love my wife and I dont need to choke her to get an orgasm. I am not even dominant - take it as the pure truth. I dont hate women. I only hate what the political and economical model in the western world did to women - and actually to all of us -, i.e. to steal us the future. And the growing inequality is just one of those evils of the last half of century liberalism, the biggest being that this ideology condemned us to be wiped off the face of the earth only to be replaced worldwide by other races and probably à terme also by other cultures. And no, I am not MGTOW (I even didnt know yet that such a sad category of people exists...): I need women. We all need women. And I would have preferred to live in a liberal society where women, and indeed men too, have all the sweet rights that a liberal order allows. But that not as the price for being condemned to get extinct . . . If there is this risk, and actually it is a certitude already (just the most stupid of us do not see it yet), I am ready to go back to a traditional social order and mend whatever the liberalism destroyed.

''Extremism'' not equal ''bad'' necessarily. Take ISIS' case: there was scores of stupid (somehow pleonastic, I know that...) western women that did go with their Muslim spouses in the area under ISIS control, and gave birth in atrocious conditions (under western bombings and lack of any decent medical system) there to some 3-4 kids. Somehow the ''extremists'' know how to make them breed. Obviously they give them exactly what these women need (domination of REAL men, not degenerate ass-kissers) which of course it is not what these women think they need (rights, careers, and feminist bullshit that barren them and make them unhappy). The same happened during the Middle Ages' : they breed like hell, the population increased despite lacking sanitary conditions, despite catastrophic drought, despite the cooling made during the small ice age, despite ongoing wars and pest epidemics and despite the stupid measures imposed by the church to make huge masses fo them nuns and monks. Despite all that, they multiplied so that they were able later to export population on 5 continents and wage many wars put under the label of crusades, and kill themselves in "world" wars. Now, in peacetime, with plenty of welfare and rights, and helping institutions, they are as another species. What changed meanwhile? Thatès the culture - some idiots convinced them to abandon "extremism". And they agreed, unfortunately. Fact is that "extremism" is the only tested method to keep a society alive and sustainable, aside the shameful and unsustainable solution of looting others' societies human resource. The liberal cockroaches had decades if not a full century to look for and find other solutions than religious fundamentalism, but they failed even to try !!! No wonder that some of us turn now toward traditions that albeit hateful, at least doesn't exterminate us as the liberalism do.

You target the Syrian (and more generally Muslim) refugees or immigrants. I wonder if you oppose also the border policies of the Canadian government that allow huge numbers of Blacks (that are illegally in USA) to come to Canada from USA, that is from a country that is not in civil war situation, nor some cruel dictatorship. I for one prefer to see a government that invest in programs to stimulate endogenous fertility, not immigration. But if there has to be immigration, I prefer much more people from Afghanistan and Syria, than Blacks. Their religion, their traditions and their ways of life doesn't concern me at all - I did live under a communist government, which it was annoying, now I live under the most obscene and idiotic regime of self-haters that ever existed, and still survive. Cultures change (too) quickly in time. Phenotype and genotype not so much.

YESSSSSS, dispatch them to Montreal ! I for one need them: pack as many Muslim families you find there and send them here. In return I encourage you to take some Haitians, there are plenty in Mt. Maybe the liberals are creating a mess with mass immigration, but les imbeciles governing the Quebec province are worse.

1. Yes, your point of view is ethnocentrism. You have to look into the dictionary, or better in a textbook of anthropology in order to see that. Or at least google: "evaluation of other cultures according to preconceptions originating in the standards and customs of one's own culture." Your worry with the freedom shows exactly that - you cannot critically consider the relative character of your own cultures' values. 3. Not so free anymore, at least in Mtl not so free if you exclude looking to vantage fashion magazines. Almost. 4. "The reason governments haven't sought to exclude peoples and whole cultures" is that governments in the plutocratic system fetishistically and erroneously called "democracy" serve mainly the business class interests, and it happen that the businesses need cheap workers - ANY people that work, but rather quiet ones (that have no tradition to cherish, and especially no ethnic conscience). The reason why "the people don't want it", is that they have already been brainwashed, as explained above (ethnocentrism), having no clue how to see things otherwise than from the point of view of dominant culture instilled aggressively from above. What better example than the Japanese you invoked, who although were once (or twice ) westernized by force, are now barren as the Westerners but have taken the stance not to import any desperate human that it is willing to serve cheaply the profit machine owned by the western elites, preferring to torture themselves by using robots and making old people work until late in their lives. Any westernized (or called better and more honestly modernized) society cease to function good enough to survive the next generation . . . And that of course is no worry for no one in western (or modern) administrations, and even if rarely some rebelious idiots in power, like Orban or Kachinsky, or recently Putin, try to implement measures to preserve the ethnic character of their countries they are decried as "authoritarians" coming from the far right side of the political spectrum and derided (and that is a bad thing, because the most tools- and skilled-deprived people are let alone to try something.) The same case as with Trump, i.e. a fascistoid idiot that it is alone in speaking about something hurting and worrying some white people. And if people or governments think there isn't an "objective benefit" in preserving a fragile ethnicity/race whom number of people is dwindling already for more than 40 yrs, you already have some elements to question this opinion - I try to not repeat myself to often. 5. "No race is in the process of getting extinct, unless they all are." - Really ???????? With whites being less than 10% of the total population in the world, and already just 50% in USA (not to count the fact that they are more old than the rest ! And not to count the intense mongrelization taking place now inside the countries where they still exist), but you think there is no risk of getting extinct ! Why ? How that ? Oh, maybe I know : the cautious optimism. "I advise you to prioritize your issues, especially your personal ones." - Yes, I know that tune: maybe better to see a psychiatrist or at least an optometrist. Or learning to count... Even better: not believing the official statistics, nor my eyes : let better a blackface-dressed-up trudeau mesmerize me into thinking that nothing bad happen, or at least nothing matters - "we are all the same", but just some of us have the chance to inherit the earth. "Our freedom allows you to hold your fringe views, and now you even have a party that gives you and the other 1.7% who believe, a home for such traditional and dead ideas." - Yes, fairly true. I would like only to make you consider a paradox: "the traditional and dead ideas" of mine make people to be born, so that the Canadian elites loot-import them to prop up their dead and dying society, because your very alive ideas make people dead-and-barren. Is there a better definition of parasitism than that ?