Marocc

Soul=murder. An assault in the western law is a broad term too. Why is it not a problem?

Do you think you're "fighting Islam"?

The way you perceive it as is. It's always the ones who know nothing about any religion that condemn all of them and then blame the faults of man on religion.

I'm sure you are your idea of godly.

But I can find so many more sources for you if the name of this doesn't please you.

http://www.quranicstudies.com/jihad/the-meaning-of-jihad/ "Jihad is simply the process of “exerting the best efforts,” involving some form of “struggle” and “resistance,” to achieve a particular goal. In other words, jihad is the struggle against, or resistance to, something for the sake of a goal. The meaning of the word is independent of the nature of the invested efforts or the sought goal. Contrary to common belief, the word “jihad” does not necessarily imply any violent effort, let alone “war” and such instances of extreme violence. It is a general term that can mean violent as well as peaceful actions, depending on the context in which it is used, as we shall indeed see later. Similarly, “jihad” as a generic word can be used even when the sought goals are not Islamic, i.e. in non-religious contexts. The Qur’an uses the verb of “jihad” in its generic meaning of “exerting the best efforts against something” in the following two verses: "And We have enjoined on man goodness to parents, but if they jahadaka (do jihad against you) to make you associate [a god] with Me, of which you have no knowledge [being a god], do not obey them. To Me is your return [O people!], so I shall inform you of your past deeds" (29.8). "And We have enjoined on man to be good to his parents; his mother bears him in weakness upon weakness, and his weaning is in two years; and that [you must] be grateful to Me and to both your parents. To Me is the eventual coming" (31.14). "And if they jahadaka (do jihad against you) to make you associate [a god] with Me, of which you have no knowledge [being a god], do not obey them, but keep company with them in this world kindly; and follow the way of he who turns to Me. Then to Me is your [O people!] return, then I shall inform you of your past deeds" (31.15)."

I know you don't need me to understand, but I do. So does the Islamic supreme Council....

I thought you wouldn't have spent more than five minutes reading the over 200,000 hadiths. Which shows in you quoting the least likely to be misunderstood and the least insinuating of violence. You could have done so much better. I'll help you with the word jihad. "The Arabic word "jihad" is often translated as "holy war," but in a purely linguistic sense, the word " jihad" means struggling or striving. The arabic word for war is: "al-harb". In a religious sense, as described by the Quran and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (s), "jihad" has many meanings. It can refer to internal as well as external efforts to be a good Muslims or believer, as well as working to inform people about the faith of Islam. If military jihad is required to protect the faith against others, it can be performed using anything from legal, diplomatic and economic to political means. If there is no peaceful alternative, Islam also allows the use of force, but there are strict rules of engagement. Innocents - such as women, children, or invalids - must never be harmed, and any peaceful overtures from the enemy must be accepted. Military action is therefore only one means of jihad, and is very rare. To highlight this point, the Prophet Mohammed told his followers returning from a military campaign: "This day we have returned from the minor jihad to the major jihad," which he said meant returning from armed battle to the peaceful battle for self-control and betterment. In case military action appears necessary, not everyone can declare jihad. The religious military campaign has to be declared by a proper authority, advised by scholars, who say the religion and people are under threat and violence is imperative to defend them. The concept of "just war" is very important. The concept of jihad has been hijacked by many political and religious groups over the ages in a bid to justify various forms of violence. In most cases, Islamic splinter groups invoked jihad to fight against the established Islamic order. Scholars say this misuse of jihad contradicts Islam. Examples of sanctioned military jihad include the Muslims' defensive battles against the Crusaders in medieval times, and before that some responses by Muslims against Byzantine and Persian attacks during the period of the early Islamic conquests." http://www.islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=9

Can you explain to me what is the act of Jihad? What makes you think it's an "increasingly mainstream interpretation" ? What did it reveal to you? How long did it take you to read it all? No, Jihad isn't going to the gym. Maybe from here it doesn't take you too many decades to learn what it is.

Yes. That's real bravery. You tell them.

I didn't ask you to discuss anything with anyone. You do it out of your own free will. I only correct you out of duty. hmm.. Deflection. Gotcha.

No, it's not. Learn the definition of the word before you teach it.

You're a liar too. How could you blame them. Besides one of them has to be lying more than the other. Some of the Palestinian babies grow up to be terrorists. Did you know that? The people you link articled about were the babies.

I was referring to taqiyya.

You won't do it because it's hard? If the babies born in Palestine are idiots, what does that make you?

Yes. No, its not.

You know the definition of the word terror? It's not a shortened form of "terrorism".

There is no sect that endorses terrorism.

No it's not accurate. However, Christians, Jews and Muslims all worship the same God so naturally there are certain identical commandment found. The old testament also tells women to cover their hair (or shave it off - preferably cover) Before Islam the women in Arabia were already wearing scarves on top of their heads, but they weren't tied around them. Yes, it's accurate. Men's awrah is from the navel down to the knees so it's pretty easy to cover. However, in many places in the Middle East for one it is often a definite social expectation a man covers his body appropriately. Long sleeves are encouraged and a lot of men even wear "Islamic" clothing like thobe and izar. Due largely to biology the most important part of a woman's hijab is covering and the most important part of a man's hijab is "lowering their gaze". That is false.

I suspect if you were born to live like they do you'd be "pro terrorism" pretty soon too. Not that I endorse such acts as bombings, especially when it's not even in the conflict zone - I don't. But most of the things these people do - like throwing those terrifying stones - is pretty understandable. They don't have the means to live a good life or build a good society. Israel can control even their access to water. Not to mention destroying their homes and shooting their family members. Those blinded by Israel’s hard-core propaganda think the deaths of Palestinians are special cases, but they're not. What Israelis are committing and have been committing for years with the west looking on, is a massacre.

Can anyone guess what makes a 20-year-old smile the more the more children she's killed? May 1st 2019 "New legislation proposed by Rep. Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, would ban Israel from using any of the billions of dollars in military assistance it receives from the United States every year to pay for the detention, interrogation, or torture of Palestinian children living under Israeli military occupation in the West Bank. Israel’s military typically arrests and prosecutes 500 to 700 Palestinian children between the ages of 12 and 17 each year, subjecting them to coercive interrogation, physical violence, and trials in military courts that lack basic guarantees of due process. “Israel’s system of military juvenile detention is state-sponsored child abuse designed to intimidate and terrorize Palestinian children and their families,” McCollum said in a statement on Wednesday. “It must be condemned, but it is equally outrageous that U.S. tax dollars in the form of military aid to Israel are permitted to sustain what is clearly a gross human rights violation against children.” The bill notes that Human Rights Watch reported in 2018 that Israel’s security forces detained Palestinian children “often using unnecessary force, questioned them without a family member present, and made them sign confessions in Hebrew, which most did not understand.” Such detentions, the same group discovered in 2015, “included the use of chokeholds, beatings, and coercive interrogation on children between the ages of 11 and 15 years.” As the text of McCollum’s bill explains, these abuses are well-known to the United States government. The findings section of the bill notes that the State Department’s 2013 human rights report pointed to evidence “that Israeli security services continued to abuse, and in some cases torture minors, frequently arrested on suspicion of stone-throwing, in order to coerce confessions. The torture tactics used included threats, intimidation, long-term handcuffing, beatings, and solitary confinement.” Researchers working for another NGO, Defense for Children International Palestine, collected affidavits from 739 Palestinian children who were detained in the West Bank between 2013 and 2018. DCIP found that 73 percent of the children had endured physical violence, 86 percent were blindfolded, 96 percent were interrogated without having a parent or family member present, 20 percent were subjected to stress positions by interrogators, and 49 percent were detained from their homes in the middle of the night. More than 120 of the children had been held in isolation for interrogation purposes for an average of 13 days before any charges were filed." https://theintercept.com/2019/05/01/betty-mccollum-israel-palestine-children-bill/ https://youtu.be/np3WRfGUIx0

Depends who you ask. Not all of them have law for it. No, they are different. No, the Shias are wrong on certain things.

When was that? I'm asking you because you know so much and you know there's all kind of opinions around.

This kind of BS asks for a few links.

In Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Sudan and UAE for instance. Sunni and Shia didn't separate because of interpretation. They separated when Muhammad (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) died because the Shias did not accept Abu Bakr as a caliph. They fight now for political reasons. They don't need to "go" to Israel. Israel comes to them. Islam is a choice. When did they start it?