Gingerteeth

Doesn't change what I am saying.

They are asked to respect charter rights and reproductive rights. Not sure what protesting has to do with it I never said they didn't have a right to protest. You keep moving the goalposts.

They are promising not to violate other people's rights. There is no right to violate rights that you are suggesting.

Yea the problem with your analogy is that the government never said that "money for anybody except religious people." Or anywhere close to that.

Except they are using government aid to do that kind of work so that makes it a government issue.

" The American College of Pediatricians is a socially conservative and politically-motivated fringe group that many pediatricians disagree with on gender identity, according to the fact-checking website Snopes.com." https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/canada/school-trustee-allowing-children-to-change-gender-is-child-abuse-1.3646087

He called the idea child abuse. His views are backwards.

Yes how dare people call out somebody who is in a position of power for having backwards views about gays and transgendered people.

You asked where treaties give FN people services. I gave you a source and now you are trying to weasel out of it. Electricity is a nevessary service especially for medical and educational institutes. We don't interpret laws in the context of 1835 we do so in the context of today.

It is exactly what you asked for. Canada inteprets laws in context of today not 150+ years ago.

They are paid based on the treaties we have with them. It is in our charter and constitution. Don't like it, don't live here. You should follow your own advice. Time to move on.

http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100032291/1100100032292 Pre confederation confederation and after

The government signed treaties that are enshrined in our constitution that gaurantees services equivalent to what all Canadians recieve on reservations. Something our government has dragged their feet on.

That scenario is entirely in your head. Come back to reality.

I never claimed Israel didn't have a claim so no disagreements there.

Thay is my argument. The UN doesn't agree the arab war ended palestinian land claims in israel. If they did they wouldn't be making an issue of it.

It's called calling people out for their piss poor way of arguing. Kind of ironic you telling me to grow up when Dog has engaged in immature behaviour. Personal anecdotes are not evidence of anything. Especially over the Internet.

More strawman arguments from you. I must have really hurt your feelings in the Israel thread.

Ah you abandoned your position entirely.

You sure like to make lots of strawman arguments.

And you're free to your opinions just as I am free to poke holes in your opinion for being flawed.

Didn't say it could change history. The UN still see Palistinian's have a claim to parts of Israel.

The UN disagrees or else it wouldn't be making a fuss with Israel over it today. East Prussia has nothing to do with it.

Your responses are red herrings. The mufti being a Nazi doesn't change Palestinian's land claims. Your next set of responses were attempts to paint me in a false lights. I didn't fall for it and now you are calling me naive, claimed I haven't responded and so on.

Doesn't change what I said.