My biggest problem with it is that it provides no help to the parents that need it, and that the parents that don't need it, don't deserve to receive it. Why should a parent on social assistance who has no intention on working, get $100 dollars a money for child care, they don't work!! They can take care of their own children can't they!! Maybe they can use the money to to give a 11-12 year old neice $5 while they go out in bingo, or playing VLT's (Harper did say parents can use the money however they want!) While a parent/parents that work (or want to work) and provide for their families (and in return pay taxes which helps cover the cost of a child care program) get only enough money to pay 1/10th of the cost. Even worse the spouse with the lower income has to claim the money on their income and pay taxes on it.
An then there is the other arguement that a parent (the mother being this parent of course ) should have the choice to stay home and take care of their child. Like $1200 a year will actually allow a working family to forgo a second income.
At the very least the conservatives should require parents submit receipts and claim childcare when they file their income taxes to show that the money was actually used for child care, then a rebate could be given to parents.
(And yes I know the above can already be done, but I'm suggesting the conservatives broaden the rules to allows a higher claim amount and greater refund amountsand crieteria)
PS My wife is pregnant and due July7th, and we can use a extra $100 a month (or $70 I guess after she files taxes in 2007), but seeing how it is my money that the Conservatives are handing out, I would rather see it spent on a program that allows parents to work, and provide for their families, than a on program that encourages social assistance reciptants not to work and get pregnant to collect another $100 a month!