SpankyMcFarland
-
Posts
5,101 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by SpankyMcFarland
-
-
2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:
Like the last 2 liberal minority governments???
Negotiations??? Where? Cooperation? When?
Liberals were the offical government but the NDP were the ones getting what they want if they supported liberals or nothing was done
Minority governments do not work either.
Canada has to get over its phobia of coalitions. They work well in many countries.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Dropping JT looks like it was a good idea for the Liberals. Of course, the big factor is south of the border and I doubt if even Trump knows what he’s going to do next on the Canada tariff file. I’d say many Liberal MPs feel they now have a fighting chance of hanging onto their seats. Enough to stay in government? Who can say.
-
1
-
-
Hitler was an unabashed Anglophile who admired the British Empire and Manifest Destiny. Bolshevism, however, was near the top of his naughty list. He dreamt of a Nordic Reich stretching from the Atlantic to the Urals, free of the ‘inferior’ races. Destroying the Soviet Union was key to this.
-
1
-
-
If that ever happened we’d have to start looking at the intelligence US social media companies are hoovering up here free of charge and other types of generous cross-border co-operation too.
-
There’s no need for another Tesla to be sold here while this attack on us continues.
-
2
-
-
7 hours ago, carepov said:
Like individuals, nations loose their rights if they violate the rights of others.
The Palestinians were minding their own business a hundred years ago. There was no Hamas back then when Britain opened the floodgates and let thousands of European immigrants in.
7 hours ago, carepov said:Hamas' goal is the elimination of Israel. Hamas has the support of the majority in Gaza and the West Bank.
That’s the situation we are in now. Israel has a government committed to annexing the West Bank. Its members regularly quote from a holy book as if it’s revealed truth.
7 hours ago, carepov said:Yes there are some Israeli's that have consistently opposed a two-state solution. The vast majority of Israelis would gladly live peacefully next to a Palestinian state that would not attack Israel.
I’m not sure about that. They elected the current government whose leader has opposed a two state solution all his political life.
7 hours ago, carepov said:Again: Hamas' goal is the elimination of Israel. How do you achieve "a settled consensus across the political spectrum for a peaceful transition to two states"?
You wouldn’t start from here. We now have an intractable tribal conflict with both sides convinced of the evil of the other and waving their holy books about as proof. There are many other examples of this, eg Ireland, Sri Lanka and Africa. What’s needed for starters are confidence-building measures. There’s no justification for settlers to be seizing any more Palestinian property in the West Bank, for example, or for dressing up as soldiers and shooting people on sight. Arab countries should grant citizenship to all Palestinian refugees currently in their country - that issue has gone on long enough. If Gaza is destroyed one of the obvious places for homeless people to go would be the West Bank as well as Egypt and other Arab countries. Israel’s bluff should be called on that but the Americans wouldn’t dare to do it.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
8 hours ago, WestCanMan said:Zelensky's green shirt shtick is getting old: we all know that he hasn't spent a minute in the line of fire.
He's not showing any solidarity at all when he plays soldier, he's showing solidarity when he tries to negotiate a peaceful settlement, but he's not all-in on peace. He's all-in on being the big man who stood up to Russia and then got a deal where Ukraine lost nothing.
Well guess what, Ukrainian Napoleon? Ukraine already lost. Territory... Lives... Money... Cities... The healthy development of a whole generation of children... It's all gone. *POOF!!!*
But wear the green shirt. Sure. It means so much.
Living under Russian rule is a catastrophe that Ukrainians have been willing to die to avoid. They understand what it means far better than we do and it’s for future generations that this war is being fought. Putin knows this as well. The prospect of Eastern Slavs living free, prosperous lives in the EU would be a constant rebuke to his ramshackle tyranny.
-
2
-
3
-
1
-
3 hours ago, taxme said:
The PC party already has a great leader. His name is Pierre Poilievre. It is the lieberal party that has no leader. The libs already had one stupid imbecile ruining Canada, and another stupid imbecile is trying to take his place. All those running for the leadership of the lib party are all WEF new world order fascists globalists. They are not for Canada. They are out to destroy Canada. PP has already said that he will have nothing to do with the WEF globalists. This is why the conservative party must win the next election. Otherwise, it will be goodbye to freedom loving Canada. 😒
Poilievre has to stand up to Trump. Really stand up the way he does to everybody domestically. The guy is threatening to take our country away and for that he deserves at least caustic mockery. Otherwise, can we trust a PM Poilievre to really stand up to the PPC wing of his own party?
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, ironstone said:
Hey, Trudeau could be pretty nasty in his own right. Just ask any of his female cabinet members who dared to question his decisions.
Trudeau’s done - yesterday’s news. If Poilievre doesn’t want to join him he’d better turn up the heat on Trump. Too much of that strange niceness may mean he never gets there.
-
1
-
-
Anybody who even flirts with this 51st state stuff is poison to the Tories. We all know how nasty Poilievre can be. He’s got to direct that fire against Trump to show centrists fleeing his party he’s not a closet MAGA-fanboy.
-
One of Trump’s lackey ‘journalists’ even pretended to take umbrage at Zelenskyy’s lack of a suit. He said he would wear a suit when the war was finished. He could have replied that Churchill didn’t wear a suit when he visited the WH in 1942 and didn’t hold an election either.
-
In these undignified spectacles foreign politicians might be better off sticking to their own language if they are fortunate to have one. Just answer the questions put to you in Ukrainian and blissfully ignore the rest of the noise. If challenged, say your English isn’t good enough for such a delicate diplomatic task.
-
1
-
-
Trump kept on emphasizing that various decisions on Ukraine weren’t made by him, implying no necessary continuity between administrations on basic foreign policy. Then he started ranting about the Mueller investigation and Hunter Biden’s laptop. What a sad day for freedom and civilization. Who will trust America again?
-
Trump behaved like the thug he is supported by his fanatical sidekick Vance. These days you’re better off being an enemy of the US - that way you won’t be shocked when you’re humiliated and extorted by them. From a tactical point of view, Zelenskyy might have been better off pulling a Chrétien, pretending not to understand the translation and replying with something incomprehensible but he was sorely provoked. For Trump on Ukraine, peace in our time means no new invasion before I leave the WH. Zelenskyy was dead right to point out how the US might feel if it ever faced a similar, existential threat. When Chinese drones are hovering overhead the younger ones of our number may have cause to recall those words.
-
On 2/22/2025 at 10:02 PM, carepov said:
Israel has accepted the 2 state model, subject to Palestine accepting the existance of Israel.
This seems like a reasonable stance, no?
If it were as simple as that it would be reasonable, yes, but a two state solution has been explicitly opposed by many in Israel since its creation. Neither side has managed to achieve a settled consensus across the political spectrum for a peaceful transition to two states.
-
On 2/21/2025 at 4:49 PM, carepov said:
Please watch the first 60 seconds of this view for an unfiltered view of the ceremony where 4 dead bodies were returned to Israel.
Two of the bodies were of Ariel and Kfir, ages 4 and nine months at the time of their capture. Autopsies revealed that the boys were strangled to death then their bodies were mutilated to make it appear that they died in an air strike. One body was supposed to be of their mother but it was not, it was an unknown person. The fourth body was an 83 year old peace activist.
If you are pro-Israel, chances are you already know this and it will not come a much of a surprise.
To the anti-Israel people, to the apathetic, and especially to the moderates: does this news surprise you? Does it affect the way that you see this war?
I know Hamas are a fanatical death cult. That does not invalidate Palestinian personal rights, like property rights, or the aspiration that all nations have to a state of their own.
-
16 hours ago, TreeBeard said:
Will Poilievre’s opposition to Trump hurt support from his “base”? We notice on this forum that Conservative supporters are also strong Trump supporters. What do they think of PP taking a stand against Trump?
Will it cause a further shift to the People’s Party?
The MAGA-types have nowhere to go and the sensible ones know they’ll waste their votes with the PPC. PP needs centrist voters who are giving the Liberals another look. He should play along with Team Canada until the election is called. Too much sniping at the govt right now in the middle of an extraordinary national crisis runs the risk of looking disloyal.
-
I’d say Tory operatives aren’t taking these polls as lightly as some here. Their direction is unmistakable. If Trump actually goes ahead with the tariffs, Poilievre will have a very difficult time.
-
My point: telling people to get thin will rarely make them thin because of how humans are wired. Unlike alcohol, you can’t give up food.
-
1 hour ago, Army Guy said:
BMI is not the standard the CF uses to access obesity, it may be a tool that some may use but it is not the standard, because to many factors in false positive readings...
We know a good portion Canadians are overweight, Before when there was standards, during your first doctors exams if you were obese, you be told lose some weight come back later...Now every Canadian must be able to attempt joining they take almost anyone....during the first PT test if you can't make it your sent to fat camp, the standard is very very low.......here your given a diet plan and do PT several times a day until you can pass...after a full year, your given the heave hoe....released for failure to achieved basic pt test...BTW during your training PT are a regular intervals to ensure in the end you can maintain or achieve CF minimum standard....
Many rugby/football players would ‘fail’ a BMI but it’s a relatively simple matter to see that a person has excess muscle rather than excess fat. In gridiron many of the offensive line players do seem to have both. Again, that’s obvious. Anyway, how one measures body fat is irrelevant and depends on the resources one has. -
BMI is a first approximation of fatness and has its limitations. Among those soldiers over, say, 240 pounds, we’re generally not talking about Fijian rugby players with muscles on their muscles. One glance solves that problem. If not, a simple waist measurement can sort things out.
The point I’m making is that excess weight is a pervasive problem in Canada and unfortunately it’s largely not under conscious control although it seems to be. Intensive screening of recruits, including a family history, would help here including awkward questions about family weight.
-
1
-
-
21 minutes ago, Army Guy said:
Or maybe we should increase current standards, and enforce them, new, and much higher standards' are need and need to be maintain...If your 350 lbs now you have a problem both mental and physical you should be put on a program until you can meet those standards...
Without surgery or semaglutide, how long do you think it will take to get them to a BMI of, what, 30, 25? Ain’t gonna happen
21 minutes ago, Army Guy said:The question each of these obese people should be asking is who is going to carry me of the battle field...pull me out of a burning Armoured vehicle, plane or helo, not only are they Not fit, but will put the lives of others at risk be it trying to save the big person, or having to do more work because they are not fit enough to keep up in a march, run, or advance to contact...each trade has it's own standards to meet for many reasons....
If they asked themselves those questions when they joined the service or any time subsequently would it have made any difference? No, because weight gain is largely unconscious.
21 minutes ago, Army Guy said:Stop recruiting fat people....those that become obese during service should be told lose it or find another occupation... Every occupation in the service will eventual come a time when your fitness will be required to save another's life...want to be round find another occupation we want warriors not diversity in the weight category...
Without drugs etc. you’ll be picking from an ever-diminishing sliver of the Canadian population for reasons explained.
People aren’t going to self-deport themselves from careers. You would need enforceable criteria of body fat content to oversee this.
-
Ukraine can’t have a free and fair election because Russia invaded the country. How difficult is this to understand?
-
Trump wants elections in Ukraine. How many general elections were there in the UK between 1935 and 1945? Was Churchill a dictator too?
Carney wins with 86% of vote
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted · Edited by SpankyMcFarland
Come the hour, cometh the man. However, I have a few grumpy quibbles. Carney has an impressive CV in an another line of work, admittedly with a political component of its own. Obviously, I wouldn’t be a PP fan but I would prefer any Canadian PM to have solid experience in the parliamentary field as an MP and minister rather than learning on the job. Given that he’s been thinking about this move for years, he should have taken the trouble to brush up his dodgy French which could be a big vulnerability in the election campaign. Another issue - age. As an older person, I prefer younger candidates for politics, preferably 35-55. I’ll grant that Carney is fit and that Chrétien was effective in his sixties but I would prefer somebody younger who is more in touch with the struggles working people face making a living and buying a home. With all that said, the party has spoken loud and clear. What a landslide.