hardworker786

no i haven't. here's my point: a) tell me why its being delayed. don't keep lying to me as CIC obviously is. if you have issue, reject the application. (though in truth, if they had a reason to reject it they would have by now). c) if you have no basis to reject my application, then accept it! or, reject it so i can appeal and have a judge decide. d) i'm not asking for special favors. just to be treated by the law in a just manner.

Thank you. My point exactly.

I don't blame you for a lack of familiarity with immigration procedure. But, if you read the threads, all the info is there.

Ok. Let me try again. It is standard that when someone applies for Canadian immigration "in state," meaning that he or she comes to Canada on a valid visa or in my case passport, and then applies for immigration based on spousal sponsorship, he or she is given an open work permit. Does that explain it?

Ok seriously. Guys. I was in the U.S. for 15 years. I'm a U.S. citizen. With a U.S. passport. Before that I was in England. Capich?

I don't have British passport. Mine expired way back when. I guess if I were to apply I would eligible for one. Not sure.

Because I applied for immigration based on spousal sponsorship. I cam to Vancouver in 2009. I lost my job in Dallas in 2009. My wife is originally from Vancouver, and suggested we move to Canada. I was hesitant at first, but then thought, why not its a nice place to raise children. So, I came in 2009 and applied. Spousal sponsorship was approved within 6 months, and I was given an open work permit etc.

oh ok. i don't know then.

hmm. good question. i don't think so. i think its similar to the U.S. or Canada, as in you can apply for citizenship at some point in your life based on your birthright.

I do not have Indian citizenship. I left India when I was 6 months old and grew up in England. The past tense in reference to my U.S. citizenship was a typo. I have a valid U.S. passport.

Thank you. I appreciate that.

I was a U.S. citizen since 1999, and a resident since 1994. I had been in the U.S. about 15 years before I move to Canada. I was not born in the U.S. I was born in India.

I just melded two posts into one. Please look above for my response.

I've been in Canada since 2009. No. I have not had an interview yet. My wife is the one who initiated the contact with Wai Young's office. I was accompanying her, and the letter posted at the beginning of the thread is in response to an email sent to my inbox. My wife has been to the office in person. My anger was at the run around they were giving her. Yes: I fully agree. I think party affiliation is a big factor, however much it may anger some people on this thread who are accusing me of being a troll.

Truth Detector, you just made my point for me. I did not compare my situation to the holocaust or something that drastic or tragic. I compared it to Japanese internment, which was far, far more humane, and on top of that I added that my situation is far more humane than Japanese internment. But I guess subtlety is not a strong suite when it comes to Harper supporters. Big surprise there. The point I was trying to make was that the generalization of characteristics based on the actions of unaffiliated people is wrong. I am a Muslim. I have been told by immigration officials that my application is undergoing a "security background check." Fine. No problems with that. But, I think there should be some parameters, some accountability, some time line. It has been almost five years now. What is the hold up? What is the reason? Am I entitled to some kind of resolution? Please read the letter that I posted at the beginning of this thread. I would appreciate a little fairness on your part. Ok, you didn't like my invoking Japanese internment. The reason I did so was because it was relatively humane. On top of that, I've added the fact my case has been handled in a far more humane manner than Japanese internment. But, the basic characteristic of a) generalizing a group of people based on actions of a few b> impunity when it comes to dealing with such people due to biased public opinion c) lack of concern for the individuals involved, the impact on their families etc. The points above pertaining to my situation are all similar to the treatment and classification of Japanese during the Second World War in the U.S. but on a far more humane level. (I've bolded that for you "truth detector," so you don't miss it. I gather nuance is not a strong suite, but please try). You may disagree with me, but that does not make my case untenable. I love how angered you are by my situation. As if I'm at fault! Have you bothered to read the letter i posted at the beginning of this thread? You are so quick to accuse others of lying, so quick to look down upon them, so quick to be "repulsed" by them because they dare to be forceful in making their case or use analogous situations that apply. I think that's a terrible way to live life. You should love your fellow human beings more and give the benefit of doubt to people. Don't assume someone is lying by default. Are you projecting? I am not a liar. Plus, think about it: What possible reason or motivation could I have for doing so on this thread? I just want to vent, to hear possible solutions that people may have to offer. Empathy means putting yourself in other people's shoes. Empathy and compassion are integral to spiritual maturity. I'm afraid you don't score high in either empathy or compassion from where I stand. I hope you never have to experience discrimination or being judged based on your ethnicity or creed, neither of which you have much control over. I wish you a happy life and peace.

Frankly, I am repulsed by someone who doesn't have the empathy that every human being should have for another human being. And, I'm repulsed by the fact that you think waiting five years or some kind of resolution to a simple PR application is a "delay." I'm skeptical of your dubious claims to neutrality. As I've said repeatedly, I want an answer. Yes or no. Why is my application being held up indefinitely with no explanation?

What are you skeptical about? Maybe I can clear it up. I wasn't comparing my situation to Japanese internment. I thought I made that abundantly clear in the original post. And, as I have said numerous times, and you seem to conveniently ignore, I just want an answer. Yes or no. I'm not asking for special favors. Haul me before an immigration judge and lets hash this out. But, don't leave me hanging. I have NEVER done anything remotely illegal my entire life. Your skepticism is unwarranted.

I tried that. The minute you mention your background and security background check they quickly lose interest. Its almost as if they know the deal. No accountability means that a free consultation is not going to solve the issue. I wish I could afford a Johnny Cocharin or something. I would love to have a high price lawyer kick their butts. THAT would get the govt's attention pronto.

I think that what has happened is similar to what happened to the Japanese during the Second World War, though on a much more humane scale. I am not comparing the internment of the Japanese during that time to my treatment. So please don't go off on that. But, what I am saying is that 50 or a 100 years from now, you can bet that they'll be apologizing for the mistreatment of hundreds of law abiding Muslims through no fault of their own. My case is clear: I have NEVER done anything remotely illegal. I've live in the West all my life. First in England then in the U.S. and now in Canada. This is a classic example of 'well public opinion is on our side, public fear and mistrust of Muslims is on our side, no one is going to stand up for them, so we can just screw them over to our heart's content.' To those of you not on the receiving end of this I cannot even begin to describe how hurtful it is. It's as if you've been stabbed in the back by those you trust and think will look out for you. You have to understand: I'm 40 years old with 3 children. I had a life before those criminals did what they did on September 11th. I used to think I was a American or Canadian before. I don't now. I know I'm a 2nd class citizen in many ways.

Thank you. That is my point: please make the process more transparent. If there is some concern about my file, well then take action on it. Reject my application, let me appeal and let a judge decide the matter. And another point I'd like to make is this: I've live in the U.S. for almost 15 years before immigrating. If there were something remotely suspicious about me, do you really think the U.S. government would renew my passport for another 10 years? Or the FBI would send a letter attesting to my clean record?

That is my point exactly. Either accept or reject the application, though there is no plausible reason for it to be rejected. My beef is that I should at least be told WHAT is going on.

Thank you Guyser. Much appreciated.

Ok fine. I get it. You're conservative. I can deduce as much from your posts. But, take away the references that seem to offend you and you would agree that my treatment has been unfair correct?

I will definitely do that.

The Stephen Harper part is in reference to the conservative government's policies on immigration, pension reform etc. The NATO reference is directed at the fact that if China and the U.S. ever go to war (God forbid), a scenario that is increasingly likely if one follows the Asia-Pacific build up, then Canada would find itself in a position that is awkward to say the least. If there were mass American casualties as there will inevitably be if such a scenario plays out, Chinese Canadians will suddenly find themselves feeling a lot like Muslim Canadians often do-both due to no fault of their own.