British Muslim leaders call for calm

[ScottSA]

You didn't seriously expect that to be true or anything, did you?

From LGF:

Notice that instead of calling for tolerance and calm, the UK’s Islamic spokesmen add fuel to the fire—and they have no compunctions about issuing veiled threats.

“Many will interpret the knighthood as a final contemptuous parting gift from Tony Blair to the Muslim world,” said secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, Abdul Bari.

Bari said that the Indian-born author earned “notoriety among Muslims for the highly insulting and blasphemous manner in which he portrayed early Islamic figures much-loved and honoured by them.”

“The insensitive decision to grant Rushdie a knighthood can therefore only do harm to the image of our country in the eyes of hundreds of millions of Muslims across the world,” he warned.

His criticism came as Pakistan’s parliament joined in the international condemnation by calling on the British government to reverse the decision or face further protests from Muslim nations.

Labour peer Lord Ahmed described Blair’s decision to approve the honor just before his steps down from power next week as double standards.

“It’s hypocrisy by Tony Blair who two weeks ago was talking about building bridges to mainstream Muslims, and then he’s honouring a man who has insulted the British public and been divisive in community relations,” Ahmed said.

Bradford Council for Mosques in northern England also criticized the knighthood as an insult to Muslim religious sensibilities and as an endorsement of the author’s views.

“The British government has acted extremely irresponsibly in knighting Rushdie at a time when it should be seeking to restore and strengthen the confidence of its Muslim subjects that it has their best interests at heart,” said council spokesman Ishtiaq Ahmed.

http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/

[guyser]

You didn't seriously expect that to be true or anything, did you?

Not if your name is attached.

—and they have no compunctions about issuing veiled threats.

And of course there was no veiled threats either.

[ScottSA]

You didn't seriously expect that to be true or anything, did you?

Not if your name is attached.

—and they have no compunctions about issuing veiled threats.

And of course there was no veiled threats either.

Of course not. "His criticism came as Pakistan’s parliament joined in the international condemnation by calling on the British government to reverse the decision or face further protests from Muslim nations."

"...it should be seeking to restore and strengthen the confidence of its Muslim subjects..."

I suppose some folks won't take this scourge seriously until it blows them up personally.

[guyser]

And of course there was no veiled threats either.

Of course not. "His criticism came as Pakistan’s parliament joined in the international condemnation by calling on the British government to reverse the decision or face further protests from Muslim nations."

"...it should be seeking to restore and strengthen the confidence of its Muslim subjects..."

Nothing veiled about it

I suppose some folks won't take this scourge seriously until it blows them up personally.

And some folks see things that are not there...like veiled threats.

[scribblet]

Imagine if knighting a fiction writer provoked other religions - would they react in the same manner? At least they are recognizing and rewarding an author who refused to be bullied and silenced by whack jobs. This knighthood honours freedom of speech and shows that bombing bookstores and issuing death threats will not silence freedom of speech.