Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

"Theories are always for someone and for some purpose" Robert Cox

To what extend does it relate to the ontological view on aboved statement? Is it true, if so why and how does it relate to the International Relations Theory and its fundational actors ?

Comments are welcomed

Posted

Dear malgo,

Metaphysically, your question is not specific enough. The causal argument has no parameters in this quote:

"Theories are always for someone and for some purpose"
All theories conform to this flimsy adage.

Further, there is no such word (as far as I have heard) as 'fundational'. Perhaps you mean 'fundament' or base.

As to the 'International relations theory' do you mean the principles of the CRF? If so, you tread on dangerous ground.

Ps. you should have used the word extent, not extend.

Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...