Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/10/29/stewart031029

OTTAWA - On the same day that a fifth cabinet minister revealed she too had accepted hospitality from the Irving family, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien and his Liberals are fighting back against opposition allegations the trips and plane rides are examples of ethical misconduct.

just something i couldnt ignore...

you know, i vote liberal just because i think they bring less crap then the other parties. that could be debated, but thats my opinion.

but this is the most pathetic behavior i can remember in a long time....this obvious conflict of interest of 5 MPs who shrug it off after the fact, its only admitted to years after the fact, they patheticly try to reimburse a few thousand dollars as if the cost is all that is important here. the PM doesnt even care to pretend to be outraged.

EVEN though i find the liberals by far the best of the worst, this stupidity is enough to make me want to change my vote in anger. but then i think, am i really stupid enough to think that the same think wont happen when another party gets cocky in power? of course it will, so teh problem isnt any particular person or party or philosohopy, but the inherent conflict of interest in democracy politics.

so i was wondering, in this situation, would changing my vote in punishment have any effect on the amount of this conflict of interest occuring again?

i think no, its useless.

SirRiff

SirRiff, A Canadian Patriot

"The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them." - Mark Twain

Posted
How in the world could ANY of the other parties be any worse?

by coming in and wasting time and energy changing all the programs in place already trying to pointlessly prove that change=responsable government, adn then donig the same things that we find out years later but cant change anyways

thus it would be worse

SirRiff

SirRiff, A Canadian Patriot

"The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them." - Mark Twain

Posted

Makes sense to me Riff. I know my MP (Alliance) is a hog trougher. First thing she voted on (Ok maybe second) was her damm pay raise. Then she got down to business. Many Alliance MPs did not vote for the pay raise so I know that it was not unanimous. My suggestion, TWO YEAR TERMS. Keep these suckers on their toes. As a plus, they don't have time to screw up things that were laid by the previous administrations unless of course that was the platform they ran on.

We're Paratroopers Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded - CPT Richard Winters

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...