2007 Session of Parliament

[jdobbin]

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...?hub=TopStories

With the ads, CTV's Ottawa bureau chief Robert Fife says Canadians can expect a nasty parliamentary session.

"If this keeps up, we're going to see fistfights break out on the floor of the House of Commons," he said.

"This is going to be a nasty and brutish session. The danger is this could lead to an election that no party wants."

Good luck getting the environment bill passed.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/01/29/...ment-house.html

[B. Max]

Good luck getting the environment bill passed.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/01/29/...ment-house.html

Actually it should be called the tyranny and genocide bill.

Harper has a chance to wipe the liberals and greens off the political map for ever if he would only tell the truth about the global warming hoax, and explain to the public what these opposition parties are trying to push the government into doing. By first calling the bill by its right name would be a good start. That would get peoples attention.

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/200701...92609-5464r.htm

The elderly and minority workers and families would be especially hard-hit. Deaths from winter cold and summer heat waves would soar, as energy prices rise and heating and air-conditioning become luxury items.

[jdobbin]

Actually it should be called the tyranny and genocide bill.

Harper has a chance to wipe the liberals and greens off the political map for ever if he would only tell the truth about the global warming hoax, and explain to the public what these opposition parties are trying to push the government into doing. By first calling the bill by its right name would be a good start. That would get peoples attention.

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/200701...92609-5464r.htm

The elderly and minority workers and families would be especially hard-hit. Deaths from winter cold and summer heat waves would soar, as energy prices rise and heating and air-conditioning become luxury items.

So you think Harper is not telling the truth in this, do you?

This guy says that there is global warming. You think we are having global cooling. Seems like a contradiction.

[B. Max]

So you think Harper is not telling the truth in this, do you?

This guy says that there is global warming. You think we are having global cooling. Seems like a contradiction.

Of course he's not. There has always been global warming and cooling, but there is no great man made global warming as the climate alarmists would have people believe.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctime...ia/16560147.htm

[jdobbin]

Of course he's not. There has always been global warming and cooling, but there is no great man made global warming as the climate alarmists would have people believe.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctime...ia/16560147.htm

Perhaps if the climate change deniers did research and published it, they would find support. McIntyre hasn't published.

[B. Max]

Of course he's not. There has always been global warming and cooling, but there is no great man made global warming as the climate alarmists would have people believe.

http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctime...ia/16560147.htm

Perhaps if the climate change deniers did research and published it, they would find support. McIntyre hasn't published.

Actually the facts are available to just about anyone, and the facts have been looked at. The claims of the climate modelers have not proven out. Then there are the frauds and lies such as the hockey stick.

[tml12]

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...?hub=TopStories

With the ads, CTV's Ottawa bureau chief Robert Fife says Canadians can expect a nasty parliamentary session.

"If this keeps up, we're going to see fistfights break out on the floor of the House of Commons," he said.

"This is going to be a nasty and brutish session. The danger is this could lead to an election that no party wants."

Good luck getting the environment bill passed.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/01/29/...ment-house.html

Dion would not vote against an NDP-sponsored environmental bill unless he was crazy. Can you imagine Dion in the next election getting hammered on that?

[jdobbin]

Dion would not vote against an NDP-sponsored environmental bill unless he was crazy. Can you imagine Dion in the next election getting hammered on that?

Who is to say if the bill will even be ready before the election if it is called in 7 weeks.

[tml12]

Dion would not vote against an NDP-sponsored environmental bill unless he was crazy. Can you imagine Dion in the next election getting hammered on that?

Who is to say if the bill will even be ready before the election if it is called in 7 weeks.

The Liberals do not want an election in 7 weeks...they are strapped for cash and it is too early after Dion's election.

[jdobbin]

Actually the facts are available to just about anyone, and the facts have been looked at. The claims of the climate modelers have not proven out. Then there are the frauds and lies such as the hockey stick.

Everyone of the people or links you post is generally from someone with no published papers on the subject of climate change. It is quite remarkable that you can never come up with some serious academics who actually know something about the climate and are willing to publish those findings.

[Ricki Bobbi]

The Liberals do not want an election in 7 weeks...they are strapped for cash and it is too early after Dion's election.

Of course not. It's all a stupid attempt by the Liberals to get the Conservatives scared. Look at how scared Martin was for most of that minority he ran.

Harper is a much stronger leader, and will be able to keep control over his caucus.

[jdobbin]

The Liberals do not want an election in 7 weeks...they are strapped for cash and it is too early after Dion's election.

Don't say they want one but they aren't going to back a government indefinitely. If the budget has points that the opposition can't agree on, then we have an election. It depends. If the budget ends up on the mild side, it will pass. If the Tories stick in something meant to provoke an election, it will end in an election. And this might be what Harper wants even though he says he doesn't.

[Ricki Bobbi]

If the Tories stick in something meant to provoke an election, it will end in an election. And this might be what Harper wants even though he says he doesn't.

The Conservatives could present an unpalatable budget and force an election, but they won't. Harper won't get into majority territory between now and budget day. He doesn't want an election unless he can win a majority.

[tml12]

The Liberals do not want an election in 7 weeks...they are strapped for cash and it is too early after Dion's election.

Don't say they want one but they aren't going to back a government indefinitely. If the budget has points that the opposition can't agree on, then we have an election. It depends. If the budget ends up on the mild side, it will pass. If the Tories stick in something meant to provoke an election, it will end in an election. And this might be what Harper wants even though he says he doesn't.

If the TV debates are going to make Dion look as buffoonish as he did in those TV ads I'd just like to have an election right now.

[B. Max]

Everyone of the people or links you post is generally from someone with no published papers on the subject of climate change. It is quite remarkable that you can never come up with some serious academics who actually know something about the climate and are willing to publish those findings.

Doesn't matter. It doesn't change the facts.

[jdobbin]

Doesn't matter. It doesn't change the facts.

They never do present facts and neither do you.

[B. Max]

Doesn't matter. It doesn't change the facts.

They never do present facts and neither do you.

Of course they do. That's why the climate alarmists have been shown to be nothing but charlatans.

[jdobbin]

Of course they do. That's why the climate alarmists have been shown to be nothing but charlatans.

And climate change deniers nothing but paid PR flacks for the oil companies.

[B. Max]

Of course they do. That's why the climate alarmists have been shown to be nothing but charlatans.

And climate change deniers nothing but paid PR flacks for the oil companies.

Oh the evil oil companies.

More facts to improve your comprehension abilities.

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

[jdobbin]

Oh the evil oil companies.

More facts to improve your comprehension abilities.

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

Dr. Singer is paid by the oil companies.

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1

[B. Max]

Oh the evil oil companies.

More facts to improve your comprehension abilities.

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

Dr. Singer is paid by the oil companies.

http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=1

So what. It doesn't change the facts.