Harper must expose this treachery

[B. Max]

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=mod...order=0&thold=0

• Establish extensive networks of alternative environmentally safe

and sound means of transportation (as agreed in Agenda 21), move away from car-dependency (as agreed in Habitat II) and cease the construction of all new highways. Ensure that all new urban and rural construction be founded on environmentally sound principles

Check out the analysis of Habitat 2

http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/hab2.html

Yes Virgina there really is a world wide socialist conspiracy emanating out of the cesspool of corruption with an agenda to destroy capitalism, end individualism abolish religion and enslave the people under a one world government.

FALSIFYING EVIDENCE TO WIN SUPPORT

"Accurate information" and "analyzing issues" are two of many seductive euphemism that deceive the public. Truth and facts matter little. What counts are stories and "scientific" arguments that evoke the "right" response: a willingness to submit to unthinkable controls in order to save the earth. For a glimpse at the twisted data used as evidence for environmental risks, ponder the following comment by Dr. Frederick Seitz, past President of the National Academy of Sciences:

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a UN organization regarded by many as the best source of scientific information about the human impact on the earth's climate, released "The Science of Climate Change 1995".... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process.... More than 15 sections... were changed or deleted after the scientists charged with examining this question had accepted the supposedly final text... The following passages are examples of those deleted:

"None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to... increases in greenhouse gases."

"No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to... man-made causes."

"IPCC reports are often called the "consensus" view. If they lead to carbon taxes and restraints on economic growth, they will have a major and almost certainly destructive impact on the economies of the world.... Their effect is to deceive policy makers and the public into believing that the scientific evidence shows human activities are causing global warming.21

"Without "proof" that humans cause global warming, globalist lose their strongest argument for world governance. Therefore they cannot let mere facts slow the spreading public persuasion that humanity's future rests in the hands of UN-US environmental 'saviors.'"

[jdobbin]

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=mod...order=0&thold=0

• Establish extensive networks of alternative environmentally safe

and sound means of transportation (as agreed in Agenda 21), move away from car-dependency (as agreed in Habitat II) and cease the construction of all new highways. Ensure that all new urban and rural construction be founded on environmentally sound principles

You got all this crap from a Christian website?

[B. Max]

http://www.pej.org/html/modules.php?op=mod...order=0&thold=0

• Establish extensive networks of alternative environmentally safe

and sound means of transportation (as agreed in Agenda 21), move away from car-dependency (as agreed in Habitat II) and cease the construction of all new highways. Ensure that all new urban and rural construction be founded on environmentally sound principles

You got all this crap from a Christian website?

No that is a Canadian atheist website from BC who are obviously another UN proxy.

[jdobbin]

You got all this crap from a Christian website?

I meant this:

http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/hab2.html

[margrace]

crossroads is a very strong fundamentalist organization with one of its main Headquarters onlong the 407 just outside of Hamilton. I know a lot about it because my sister buys into their BS

[B. Max]

You got all this crap from a Christian website?

I meant this:

http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/hab2.html

Now that could be. No matter, they are correct and you have confirmed the global governance view of at least the christian religion.

[jdobbin]

Now that could be. No matter, they are correct and you have confirmed the global governance view of at least the christian religion.

Don't you check these things before you post them? This religious group sounds pretty out there.

[jdobbin]

crossroads is a very strong fundamentalist organization with one of its main Headquarters onlong the 407 just outside of Hamilton. I know a lot about it because my sister buys into their BS

What other stuff are they known for? Their website was pretty scary.

[B. Max]

Now that could be. No matter, they are correct and you have confirmed the global governance view of at least the christian religion.

Don't you check these things before you post them? This religious group sounds pretty out there.

Check check. Again you shoot the messenger. Maybe you should get after that BC website for confirming the connection to agenda 21 and habitat 2 which they clearly promote. The only thing out there is the UN's laundry list of social engineering and the tyranny of global governance which has been exposed and confirmed. Freedom from religion only to be a slave in their new world order of global governance.

[jdobbin]

Check check. Again you shoot the messenger. Maybe you should get after that BC website for confirming the connection to agenda 21 and habitat 2 which they clearly promote. The only thing out there is the UN's laundry list of social engineering and the tyranny of global governance which has been exposed and confirmed. Freedom from religion only to be a slave in their new world order of global governance.

The words you use like treachery and tyranny are so out there.

I follow your links and find a fundamentalist site and you tell me to read the truthiness of their ideas? I gotta question your link when it ends with this:

"BUT GOD STILL REIGNS

"Why do the nations rage, and the people plot a vain thing?" asked the psalmist. "The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord and His Anointed, saying, 'Let us break their bonds in pieces and cast away their cords from us."

The words King David wrote more than 2000 years ago, fit our times. Then as now, the leaders joined together to plot the end of God's reign. They would destroy His influence, break free from His natural order, and establish a new form of government based on their own imagination. History shows the devastating results. But God continues to reign! No matter how much people shun, mock or slander Him, He remains God. We, not He, become the losers when we ignore Him and shun His truth.

"The LORD brings the counsel of the nations to nothing, He makes the plans of the peoples of no effect," wrote the author of Psalm 33. "The counsel of the Lord stands forever." To those who know His wisdom, that's good news!

The bad news is that most of the world is following false counsel. It's time for Americans wake up, return to God, and stand together against the oppressive forces that now surround and permeate America.

Meanwhile there is no need for fear. Someone has wisely said, "Christianity is designed to be lived in difficult places." No matter how hard it gets, He offers shelter to all who trust Him and follow His wisdom."

[B. Max]

The words you use like treachery and tyranny are so out there.

Because that's what it is.

I follow your links and find a fundamentalist site and you tell me to read the truthiness of their ideas? I gotta question your link when it ends with this:

You are not questioning anything, you are trying to smear the Christian religion and avoid the facts.

[jdobbin]

You are not questioning anything, you are trying to smear the Christian religion and avoid the facts.

The fact is God is the answer? This is how your page link ends.

[B. Max]

You are not questioning anything, you are trying to smear the Christian religion and avoid the facts.

The fact is God is the answer? This is how your page link ends.

No this is how it ends.

| Home |Preparing for Victory | Armor of God | Persecution | Articles | Books |

Again you avoid the facts.

FALSIFYING EVIDENCE TO WIN SUPPORT

"Accurate information" and "analyzing issues" are two of many seductive euphemism that deceive the public. Truth and facts matter little. What counts are stories and "scientific" arguments that evoke the "right" response: a willingness to submit to unthinkable controls in order to save the earth. For a glimpse at the twisted data used as evidence for environmental risks, ponder the following comment by Dr. Frederick Seitz, past President of the National Academy of Sciences:

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a UN organization regarded by many as the best source of scientific information about the human impact on the earth's climate, released "The Science of Climate Change 1995".... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process.... More than 15 sections... were changed or deleted after the scientists charged with examining this question had accepted the supposedly final text... The following passages are examples of those deleted:

"None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to... increases in greenhouse gases." "No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to... man-made causes."

"IPCC reports are often called the "consensus" view. If they lead to carbon taxes and restraints on economic growth, they will have a major and almost certainly destructive impact on the economies of the world.... Their effect is to deceive policy makers and the public into believing that the scientific evidence shows human activities are causing global warming.21

"Without "proof" that humans cause global warming, globalist lose their strongest argument for world governance. Therefore they cannot let mere facts slow the spreading public persuasion that humanity's future rests in the hands of UN-US environmental 'saviors.'"

[mikedavid00]

Now that could be. No matter, they are correct and you have confirmed the global governance view of at least the christian religion.

Don't you check these things before you post them? This religious group sounds pretty out there.

So. Does that mean they don't have the ability to post factual evidence?

I find you guys to more out there then them, but I don't discount your ability to post factual documents.

[jdobbin]

FALSIFYING EVIDENCE TO WIN SUPPORT

"Accurate information" and "analyzing issues" are two of many seductive euphemism that deceive the public. Truth and facts matter little. What counts are stories and "scientific" arguments that evoke the "right" response: a willingness to submit to unthinkable controls in order to save the earth. For a glimpse at the twisted data used as evidence for environmental risks, ponder the following comment by Dr. Frederick Seitz, past President of the National Academy of Sciences:

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a UN organization regarded by many as the best source of scientific information about the human impact on the earth's climate, released "The Science of Climate Change 1995".... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process.... More than 15 sections... were changed or deleted after the scientists charged with examining this question had accepted the supposedly final text... The following passages are examples of those deleted:

"None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to... increases in greenhouse gases." "No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change to... man-made causes."

"IPCC reports are often called the "consensus" view. If they lead to carbon taxes and restraints on economic growth, they will have a major and almost certainly destructive impact on the economies of the world.... Their effect is to deceive policy makers and the public into believing that the scientific evidence shows human activities are causing global warming.21

"Without "proof" that humans cause global warming, globalist lose their strongest argument for world governance. Therefore they cannot let mere facts slow the spreading public persuasion that humanity's future rests in the hands of UN-US environmental 'saviors.'"

The fact is that you're facts are wrong.

[B. Max]

The fact is that you're facts are wrong.

They are not wrong.

[jdobbin]

They are not wrong.

Everything and anything you have posted on the subject has been incorrect.

[B. Max]

They are not wrong.

Everything and anything you have posted on the subject has been incorrect.

Prove it.

[jdobbin]

Prove it.

Did, done but you missed it.

[B. Max]

Prove it.

Did, done but you missed it.

The only thing you've proven so far is that you don't like the facts.

[jdobbin]

The only thing you've proven so far is that you don't like the facts.

And I was going to say the same thing about you.

[B. Max]

It just keeps getting better. Remember this.

FALSIFYING EVIDENCE TO WIN SUPPORT

"Accurate information" and "analyzing issues" are two of many seductive euphemism that deceive the public. Truth and facts matter little. What counts are stories and "scientific" arguments that evoke the "right" response: a willingness to submit to unthinkable controls in order to save the earth. For a glimpse at the twisted data used as evidence for environmental risks, ponder the following comment by Dr. Frederick Seitz, past President of the National Academy of Sciences:

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a UN organization regarded by many as the best source of scientific information about the human impact on the earth's climate, released "The Science of Climate Change 1995".... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process....

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/st...c3-60343f461cac

[jdobbin]

It just keeps getting better. Remember this.

FALSIFYING EVIDENCE TO WIN SUPPORT

"Accurate information" and "analyzing issues" are two of many seductive euphemism that deceive the public. Truth and facts matter little. What counts are stories and "scientific" arguments that evoke the "right" response: a willingness to submit to unthinkable controls in order to save the earth. For a glimpse at the twisted data used as evidence for environmental risks, ponder the following comment by Dr. Frederick Seitz, past President of the National Academy of Sciences:

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a UN organization regarded by many as the best source of scientific information about the human impact on the earth's climate, released "The Science of Climate Change 1995".... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process....

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/st...c3-60343f461cac

"However, Christopher Landsea, of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) National Hurricane Center in Florida, says the results are ambiguous.

"We agree the potential is there for hurricanes to get worse due to man-made global warming, but the big issue is by how much," he said. "

Seems that he agrees that global warming is happening. He's just not convinced about hurricanes.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4751577.stm

[B. Max]

It just keeps getting better. Remember this.

FALSIFYING EVIDENCE TO WIN SUPPORT

"Accurate information" and "analyzing issues" are two of many seductive euphemism that deceive the public. Truth and facts matter little. What counts are stories and "scientific" arguments that evoke the "right" response: a willingness to submit to unthinkable controls in order to save the earth. For a glimpse at the twisted data used as evidence for environmental risks, ponder the following comment by Dr. Frederick Seitz, past President of the National Academy of Sciences:

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a UN organization regarded by many as the best source of scientific information about the human impact on the earth's climate, released "The Science of Climate Change 1995".... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process....

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/st...c3-60343f461cac

"However, Christopher Landsea, of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) National Hurricane Center in Florida, says the results are ambiguous.

"We agree the potential is there for hurricanes to get worse due to man-made global warming, but the big issue is by how much," he said. "

Seems that he agrees that global warming is happening. He's just not convinced about hurricanes.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4751577.stm

However there is one big problem. There is no proof of man made global warming, and why did they give the guy the boot.

[jdobbin]

However there is one big problem. There is no proof of man made global warming, and why did they give the guy the boot.

He agreed there was global warming. He didn't agree there was increased hurricanes.