MightyAC Posted December 1, 2006 Report Posted December 1, 2006 Harper has always wanted to give the provinces more power and autonomy. This unsupported, slick little manoeuvre may in the short term buy him some votes in Quebec and in time achieve his goal. Quote
geoffrey Posted December 1, 2006 Report Posted December 1, 2006 Harper has always wanted to give the provinces more power and autonomy. This unsupported, slick little manoeuvre may in the short term buy him some votes in Quebec and in time achieve his goal. This doesn't give anyone power or autonomy. This gives sepertists in Quebec a moral advantage. Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
MightyAC Posted December 1, 2006 Report Posted December 1, 2006 Harper has always wanted to give the provinces more power and autonomy. This unsupported, slick little manoeuvre may in the short term buy him some votes in Quebec and in time achieve his goal. This doesn't give anyone power or autonomy. This gives sepertists in Quebec a moral advantage. Aye, I agree that it doesn't give anyone power or autonomy right now....that's why I sad "in time". I believe seperatists will use this new little bit of leverage to pry a little more money, services and autonomy out of Ottawa. It's only a matter of time before the other provinces demand equal treatment. Although Alberta, BC, Newfoundland, etc may not push to be recognized as nations (even though I believe they could, hell the Newfies even have their own language) this motion gets the ball rolling in the direction of greater provincial power. Quote
g_bambino Posted December 1, 2006 Report Posted December 1, 2006 This doesn't give anyone power or autonomy. This gives sepertists in Quebec a moral advantage. Aye, I agree that it doesn't give anyone power or autonomy right now....that's why I sad "in time". I believe seperatists will use this new little bit of leverage to pry a little more money, services and autonomy out of Ottawa. It's only a matter of time before the other provinces demand equal treatment. Although Alberta, BC, Newfoundland, etc may not push to be recognized as nations (even though I believe they could, hell the Newfies even have their own language) this motion gets the ball rolling in the direction of greater provincial power. There's been no shift in the relationship between the provinces. The motion of the House didn't deem Quebec to be a nation, it said the Québecois are a nation. The inability of anyone to define what a Québecois is will, I think, be what undermines any attempt by sovereigntists to demand more independence, money, or what-have-you. How can you demand more for something that you can't quantify? Quote
MightyAC Posted December 1, 2006 Report Posted December 1, 2006 There's been no shift in the relationship between the provinces. The motion of the House didn't deem Quebec to be a nation, it said the Québecois are a nation. The inability of anyone to define what a Québecois is will, I think, be what undermines any attempt by sovereigntists to demand more independence, money, or what-have-you. How can you demand more for something that you can't quantify? Do you seriously think seperatists will stop now? I'm willing to bet that the Bloc will soon push to label the province of Quebec as a nation or to officially recognize all inhabitants of Quebec as Québecois. They will clarify this "unquantifiable" definition into something concrete. Something they couldn't have done if this motion was not proposed. Quebec has been angling for and receiving special deals and autonomy prior to being a "distinct society" and a "nation". It has already been angering other provinces and will continue to do so as they use their new little wedge to pry some more. In time others will push for equality and the powers of the provinces will be increased. Quote
Hydraboss Posted December 1, 2006 Report Posted December 1, 2006 I would love to see Kwebek labelled a "nation" instead of a province. They seem to be good at getting what they want, while at the same time setting precedent for other provinces. I'd sooner see them pay the bills both financially and politically for doing the work and paving the way for eventual Alberta seperation. Go Kwebek!!!! Quote "racist, intolerant, small-minded bigot" - AND APPARENTLY A SOCIALIST (2010) (2015)Economic Left/Right: 8.38 3.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.13 -1.23
seabee Posted December 2, 2006 Report Posted December 2, 2006 Québec is part of Can-eh-d'oh! Insults can be traded. Quote
jbg Posted December 2, 2006 Report Posted December 2, 2006 Canada is huge, too big and too diverse to govern centrally. Harper may have made an ok move here, but only if he extends it too all provinces, and recongises provincial sovereignty over all cultural issues. Then why isn't the US "too big and too diverse to govern centrally"? Quote Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
jdobbin Posted December 2, 2006 Report Posted December 2, 2006 Then why isn't the US "too big and too diverse to govern centrally"? Some people have said for years that it is and that it should be divided into superstates. Some Republicans have been keen on that idea for a while now. Quote
skyclad Posted December 2, 2006 Report Posted December 2, 2006 What is a Quebcois? quite simple, 1) your ancestors had to of come on the boats from France, up to the time of the Plains of Abraham battle. 2) must be able to trace both sides of your family back to that small group in point 1), no mixes as: French/Irish, French, French Hiatian etc... As for the USA, I foresee 5 separate nation within 200 years. Quote
Borg Posted December 2, 2006 Report Posted December 2, 2006 By the time the legal beagles and the supreme court get done with things - and it is coming - there will be numerous nations in Canada - all screaming for money and rights. And money and rights and money and rights........ We have possibly ripped the fabric - if there ever was one - of this country and no one has the intestinal fortitude to repair it. Borg Quote
abcon99 Posted December 4, 2006 Report Posted December 4, 2006 Who cares, saying it means nothing and it gets the subject off the table. The Quebecois are a nation, and that is worth some pride, but not a red cent. Prime Minister Harper is correct, and Michael Chong is too prissy about word play. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.