Shakeyhands Posted November 21, 2006 Report Posted November 21, 2006 Other than saying he would, I see no sense in this. http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...ol=968793972154 Imagine if the vote was to revisit it? THAT would be interesting Quote "They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche
scribblet Posted November 21, 2006 Report Posted November 21, 2006 It won't pass, and it won't be a confidence vote. Quote Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province
Technocrat Posted November 21, 2006 Report Posted November 21, 2006 What a freakin waste of time, money and resources... Quote
Warwick Green Posted November 21, 2006 Report Posted November 21, 2006 Forty-three religious groups — ranging from Shiite, Sunni and Druze Muslims to Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic and evangelical Christians — signed a declaration earlier this month saying Parliament had repudiated millennia of history. That explains it. Tory Gothic. Those are the ones they are pandering to. Quote
geoffrey Posted November 22, 2006 Report Posted November 22, 2006 Forty-three religious groups — ranging from Shiite, Sunni and Druze Muslims to Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic and evangelical Christians — signed a declaration earlier this month saying Parliament had repudiated millennia of history. That explains it. Tory Gothic. Those are the ones they are pandering to. I really wish those opposed to attacks on relgious practice would use more sensible arguments. I happen to oppose same-sex marriage, but I'm ok with civil benefits being extended to homosexual couples... but that kind of comment is ridicuous. I think we repudiated millennia of history when we outlawed slavery too... Quote RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game") --
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.