Jump to content

"Freakonomics"


Figleaf

Recommended Posts

Since there's no economics forum, I guess I'll post this here...

I just read this book, "Freakonomics". In case anyone is thinking of getting it, I'll tell you what I thought:

Superficial. Obvious. Over-written and under-thought. Self-congratulatory. Repetitive. Misrepresented (more sociology than economics). Lacking rigor. Disappointing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since there's no economics forum, I guess I'll post this here...

I just read this book, "Freakonomics". In case anyone is thinking of getting it, I'll tell you what I thought:

Superficial. Obvious. Over-written and under-thought. Self-congratulatory. Repetitive. Misrepresented (more sociology than economics). Lacking rigor. Disappointing.

It has been discussed but not as a topic unto itself. I raised it in the context of abortion being cited as helping to reduce crime. I know some demographers have said that an aging population has helped reduce crime. Perhaps Levitt thinks abortion has helped prevent an aged population from getting younger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since there's no economics forum, I guess I'll post this here...

I just read this book, "Freakonomics". In case anyone is thinking of getting it, I'll tell you what I thought:

Superficial. Obvious. Over-written and under-thought. Self-congratulatory. Repetitive. Misrepresented (more sociology than economics). Lacking rigor. Disappointing.

It has been discussed but not as a topic unto itself. I raised it in the context of abortion being cited as helping to reduce crime. I know some demographers have said that an aging population has helped reduce crime. Perhaps Levitt thinks abortion has helped prevent an aged population from getting younger.

His thoughts on abortion and crime are about 1/6 - 1/8 of the book and represent the only original thought therein. He su gests that crime dropped due to increased abortions being

most frequent among the socio-economic classes most prone to criminality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eugenics would work just as well. Find the more crime focused populations, prevent them from reproducing. Next, take all the poor people, preven them from reproducing. Then take the rich, smart people, and issue licenses to only the most qualified to have kids and raise them appropriately.

And your left with... not much unfortunately.

Abortion as a social planning tool isn't only wrong on pro-life grounds, but wrong on every other possible level. I suggest you start with killing the handicapped first if you actually believed in that crap.

Personally, I think people left to do their own thing, and reach their own potential, generally do ok. If we prevented poors from having kids, think of all the heros and leaders our society would be lacking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eugenics would work just as well. Find the more crime focused populations, prevent them from reproducing. Next, take all the poor people, preven them from reproducing. Then take the rich, smart people, and issue licenses to only the most qualified to have kids and raise them appropriately.

Never suggested it as a strategy myself. I was summarizing one of the basic tenets of the book.

I do believe that an aging population is probably responsible for a portion of reduced crime but I'm not a demographer or a statistician. I have no idea if that is whole story. Some say increased police presence has helped. However, that argument is not wholly true either because in some places crime was already going down when police numbers were increased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just have to say something on this thread. We are being lead down a path by zealots and scientists. Our society is leaning toward a demographics approach to politics. Instead of having real leaders speak toward their personal vision we are having government by opinion polls. Our societry is becoming luke warm and spurred by popular opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...