PocketRocket Posted December 24, 2005 Report Posted December 24, 2005 A classified radiation monitoring program, conducted without warrants, has targeted private U.S. property in an effort to prevent an al-Qaida attack, federal law enforcement officials confirmed Friday. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10588528/ This actually makes sense to me. I mean privacy is one thing, but if you can literally drive by someone's house (hall/garage/office block/whatever) and point a doohickey at the building, and pick up some sort of radiation emission which is definitively linked to some sort of nuclear device, then as far as I'm concerned privacy concerns are right out the window. While I largely disagree with the Patriot Act, this is a completely different ball of wax. No way that this can be used under false pretenses to put away some kid who's growing a couple pot plants in his attic. This would address one issue, and one only; possible nukes. Quote I need another coffee
moderateamericain Posted December 24, 2005 Report Posted December 24, 2005 A classified radiation monitoring program, conducted without warrants, has targeted private U.S. property in an effort to prevent an al-Qaida attack, federal law enforcement officials confirmed Friday. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10588528/ This actually makes sense to me. I mean privacy is one thing, but if you can literally drive by someone's house (hall/garage/office block/whatever) and point a doohickey at the building, and pick up some sort of radiation emission which is definitively linked to some sort of nuclear device, then as far as I'm concerned privacy concerns are right out the window. While I largely disagree with the Patriot Act, this is a completely different ball of wax. No way that this can be used under false pretenses to put away some kid who's growing a couple pot plants in his attic. This would address one issue, and one only; possible nukes. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Its safe to say that that is something i can live with. As long as ALL it does is sniff for emissions Quote
Montgomery Burns Posted December 26, 2005 Report Posted December 26, 2005 A classified radiation monitoring program, conducted without warrants, has targeted private U.S. property in an effort to prevent an al-Qaida attack, federal law enforcement officials confirmed Friday. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10588528/ This actually makes sense to me. I mean privacy is one thing, but if you can literally drive by someone's house (hall/garage/office block/whatever) and point a doohickey at the building, and pick up some sort of radiation emission which is definitively linked to some sort of nuclear device, then as far as I'm concerned privacy concerns are right out the window. While I largely disagree with the Patriot Act, this is a completely different ball of wax. No way that this can be used under false pretenses to put away some kid who's growing a couple pot plants in his attic. This would address one issue, and one only; possible nukes. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree. Nothing wrong with sniffing for radiation out of mosques - especially with their sordid history of abetting terrorism. Quote "Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done, and President Bush, let them go to hell!" -- Iraqi Betty Dawisha, after dropping her vote in the ballot box, wields The Cluebat™ to the anti-liberty crowd on Dec 13, 2005. "Call me crazy, but I think they [iraqis] were happy with thier [sic] dumpy homes before the USA levelled so many of them" -- Gerryhatrick, Feb 3, 2006.
PocketRocket Posted December 28, 2005 Author Report Posted December 28, 2005 I'd say not just mosques. If they've got a radiation-sniffer that can see through walls, then as far as I'm concerned, go to it!!! Mosques, Theaters, Halls, Office blocks, apartment blocks, warehouses, sniff 'em all. Better than confiscating library records or covertly recording phone calls. Quote I need another coffee
theloniusfleabag Posted December 28, 2005 Report Posted December 28, 2005 Dear PocketRocket, It can be done from space... http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/mti.htm or from the ground... http://www.grove-ent.com/nucraddet.html Mind you, thermal imaging has been used to find pot grow-ops, even though the actual imaging isn't admissable as evidence by itself. Quote Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?
PocketRocket Posted December 29, 2005 Author Report Posted December 29, 2005 Howdy, T-BAG: I agree, but this is not thermal imaging, at least not to my understanding. It sniffs radiation rather than heat. Can't think of any reason a grow-op would be producing radiation, unless they're carrying out some Lisa-Simpson-esque experiment to grow giant, mutant pot plants, which could only be a good thing, if possible. Quote I need another coffee
theloniusfleabag Posted December 29, 2005 Report Posted December 29, 2005 Dear PocketRocket, I'd say not just mosques.If they've got a radiation-sniffer that can see through walls, then as far as I'm concerned, go to it!!! Mosques, Theaters, Halls, Office blocks, apartment blocks, warehouses, sniff 'em all. I am inclined to agree. Radiation is one of those things that has almost zero practicality in the hands of ordinary people.I agree, but this is not thermal imaging, at least not to my understanding.It sniffs radiation rather than heat. Can't think of any reason a grow-op would be producing radiation It is my understanding that light is a form of radiation...http://www.astronomynotes.com/light/s3.htm So really, a 'sniffer' doesn't 'see' into the building, it detects the radiation that 'leaks out'. unless they're carrying out some Lisa-Simpson-esque experiment to grow giant, mutant pot plants, which could only be a good thing, if possible.With buds the size of watermelons....'closet farmers' across the country would be tickled pink...not to mention possibly sterile....er,...I'll stick to the old method, thanks. Quote Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?
PocketRocket Posted December 29, 2005 Author Report Posted December 29, 2005 Dear PocketRocket, Always a pleasure, T-BAG. (BTW, I hope you don't mind the abbreviated nickname. No offense is meant by it.) It is my understanding that light is a form of radiation...http://www.astronomynotes.com/light/s3.htm So really, a 'sniffer' doesn't 'see' into the building, it detects the radiation that 'leaks out'. True, light is a form of radiation. However, we are looking at a completely different type of radiation here, something called "radioactivity", which is generally applied to radiation at the atomic level. Where light can be blocked by a plain, wooden wall, radioactivity can be detected through almost any substance aside from very thick lead, simply because the radiated atomic fragments pass between the molecules of the wall as easily as a bird passes through the air. A geiger counter, for example, is actually registering the atomic fragments which impact on its sensing device. But a geiger counter will not register light. I believe they would be using a variation on a geiger-counter for this type of detection, but something that can "see" further than the normal GC. There ya go. Atomic physics, kindergarten level (which is about as far as my understanding of the subject goes) unless they're carrying out some Lisa-Simpson-esque experiment to grow giant, mutant pot plants, which could only be a good thing, if possible.With buds the size of watermelons....'closet farmers' across the country would be tickled pink...not to mention possibly sterile....er,...I'll stick to the old method, thanks. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The size of watermelons, hmm??? Something to think about. BTW, sterility doesn't mean impotence, and I have no desire to have any more kids, so for me there's no downside Quote I need another coffee
theloniusfleabag Posted December 29, 2005 Report Posted December 29, 2005 Dear PocketRocket, QUOTE(theloniusfleabag @ Dec 29 2005, 11:49 AM)Dear PocketRocket, Always a pleasure, T-BAG. (BTW, I hope you don't mind the abbreviated nickname. No offense is meant by it.) No offense taken, it is a bit of a long name. (With some names here, I have actually cut&pasted then rather than typing them...notably Tokyo Takarazuka(sp?)Of all the shortened versions I have heard of my moniker, I like this one best. Quote Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events?
PocketRocket Posted December 29, 2005 Author Report Posted December 29, 2005 Cool. Which leads to the question of the day; in light of its meaning, why is "abbreviated" such a long word??? Quote I need another coffee
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.