B. Max Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 I think it's long past time to put these preditors back in the closet and lock the door. http://www.cwfa.org/articles/9144/CFI/education/index.htm One poster, titled, “Things you can do to eradicate gender or multiply it exponentially,” features cross-dressing, and has these suggestions: • “Think twice before you ask people if their child is a boy or a girl. • Spend a day in drag. • Refer to everyone by the incorrect pronoun. • Challenge binary gender paradigms over Thanksgiving dinner. • Hang out with children and teach them how to cross dress Barbie and G.I. Joe. • Refuse to check off your sex when filling out forms.” Clearly, the homosexual movement's effort to recruit children has never been stronger than it is now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 I think it's long past time to put these preditors back in the closet and lock the door.http://www.cwfa.org/articles/9144/CFI/education/index.htm One poster, titled, “Things you can do to eradicate gender or multiply it exponentially,” features cross-dressing, and has these suggestions: • “Think twice before you ask people if their child is a boy or a girl. • Spend a day in drag. • Refer to everyone by the incorrect pronoun. • Challenge binary gender paradigms over Thanksgiving dinner. • Hang out with children and teach them how to cross dress Barbie and G.I. Joe. • Refuse to check off your sex when filling out forms.” Clearly, the homosexual movement's effort to recruit children has never been stronger than it is now. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's okay. That means more chicks for me. And hey, they only have to be fourteen. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theloniusfleabag Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 Dear Argus, That's okay. That means more chicks for meI often wondered why rednecks (not meaning you, I don't share some other's opinion of you in that light) were thought of as 'anti-gay' when it means more available 'chicks'? Mind you, there are some women that are drawn to homosexual men like moths to a light....the ones that hang around the gay male 'scene' are called, (using the vernacular) 'fag-hags'. I was told that they seem to think that they are 'the one', the woman so 'womanly', that they could 'straighten them out'. Quote Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RB Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Dear Argus,That's okay. That means more chicks for meI often wondered why rednecks (not meaning you, I don't share some other's opinion of you in that light) were thought of as 'anti-gay' when it means more available 'chicks'? Mind you, there are some women that are drawn to homosexual men like moths to a light....the ones that hang around the gay male 'scene' are called, (using the vernacular) 'fag-hags'. I was told that they seem to think that they are 'the one', the woman so 'womanly', that they could 'straighten them out'. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I didn't feel women "fag - hags" woud try and change homosexuals. They hang around gay folks because gays are not afraid to exhibit characteristics women are drawn to e.g. sympaties, plus they don't exist as potential partner whom one have to impress. I know some gay folks and can vouch that the dialogue is easier, bonding is effortless, you feel comfortable, plus it is much easier to make demands without much protest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Dear Argus,That's okay. That means more chicks for meI often wondered why rednecks (not meaning you, I don't share some other's opinion of you in that light) were thought of as 'anti-gay' when it means more available 'chicks'? Mind you, there are some women that are drawn to homosexual men like moths to a light....the ones that hang around the gay male 'scene' are called, (using the vernacular) 'fag-hags'. I was told that they seem to think that they are 'the one', the woman so 'womanly', that they could 'straighten them out'. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Because they can hang around men, who they like, but without any fears of come-ons, of being stared at, lusted after, etc. The whole male/female sexual tension is absent. And they can talk to men about feelings and get listened to. They can talk to men about sex without fear of turning them on. They can even ask about whether their skirt makes them look fat and get something approaching a true answer - which won't anger them, btw, as it would if they asked their own man. They can also flirt outrageously but entirely safely. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanie_ Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 I think it's long past time to put these preditors back in the closet and lock the door. B Max, I saw nothing predatory about the article you quoted. What is the problem with a more open, tolerant society? What is the problem with taking the stigma out of sexual orientation? Homosexuality has always existed, it isn't a lifestyle choice it is an inborn characteristic, and it doesn't harm you in the least. Quote For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B. Max Posted October 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 I think it's long past time to put these preditors back in the closet and lock the door. B Max, I saw nothing predatory about the article you quoted. What is the problem with a more open, tolerant society? What is the problem with taking the stigma out of sexual orientation? Homosexuality has always existed, it isn't a lifestyle choice it is an inborn characteristic, and it doesn't harm you in the least. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That is a complete nonsense from any any proven scientific fact that one is born that way. You are either born a boy or a girl / man or a woman. In fact, if we are to believe that, then we must also believe that pedophiles, murders, rapists, transgenders and what ever else is born that way. When in fact it nothing more than a perverted unbridled sexual desire. Making these people lust driven predators which must not be tolerated from any aspect of a moral society. http://www.familyaction.org/Articles/issue...y-hollywood.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riverwind Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 That is a complete nonsense from any any proven scientific fact that one is born that way. You are either born a boy or a girl / man or a woman.This is not true. There are 1000s of children born every year with ambiguous gender and must go through surgery to 'assign' a gender to them so they can fit into society.http://www.hopkinschildrens.org/specialtie...tersex/sd3.html Unfortunately, the person's 'assigned' sexual identity as a child may be different than what they really feel as an adult. That is why 'transgender' people exist. Quote To fly a plane, you need both a left wing and a right wing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanie_ Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 No, we don't have to believe people are born murderers or rapists just because we believe people are born gay. Sexuality and aggression are both natural instincts; however, how we express these instincts is a result of socialization. People who are socialized to think that violent actions are justified may become rapists and murderers. People who are born gay can be socialized to deny their nature and stay in the closet all their lives, but that doesn't change who they are; people who are not gay can be socialized to be bigoted and intolerant, or they can be socialized to respect those who are different from them. Quote For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PocketRocket Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Here we go again. Isn't homophobia wonderful??? Quote I need another coffee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Here we go again. Isn't homophobia wonderful??? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> People throw terms like that around too easily. I believe schools should teach reading, writing, math, history, geography and science. That's it. Morals should be left to the parents. I don't believe schools should be indoctrinating vulnerable children with one political viewpoint or another, especially as they do such a lousy job of teaching the basics. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theloniusfleabag Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 Dear Argus, People throw terms like that around too easily.Indeed, 'phobia' means fear of, when a lot of derogatory and misguided pronouncements usually come from 'a hatred of'. Somewhat like Rev. Phelps and his website http://www.godhatesfags.com/ I suspect that the hatred isn't from God... RB, I didn't feel women "fag - hags" woud try and change homosexuals. They hang around gay folks because gays are not afraid to exhibit characteristics women are drawn to e.g. sympaties, plus they don't exist as potential partner whom one have to impress.I have known a couple.I know some gay folks and can vouch that the dialogue is easier, bonding is effortless,I have to agree, one of by best friends is a 'faggot'. Great guy, and although there was one time I felt he may have been attracted to me, there was no 'sexual tension' (or fear on my part, I am a happily married hetero) or anything else. He moved to another city to open up a business, but we still keep in touch, and I do miss his company for fishing and billiards. Quote Would the Special Olympics Committee disqualify kids born with flippers from the swimming events? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanie_ Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 I don't believe schools should be indoctrinating vulnerable children with one political viewpoint or another, especially as they do such a lousy job of teaching the basics. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What do you call constantly reinforcing heterosexuality? Is that not also indoctrinating one political viewpoint? Quote For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BHS Posted October 11, 2005 Report Share Posted October 11, 2005 As long as I don't have to be subjected to Government of Canada TV commercials (paid for, in part, by me) telling me how wearing a dress and heals will make me a better person, then I could care less. I'll wear a dress and heals for my own reasons, thanks. Quote "And, representing the Slightly Silly Party, Mr. Kevin Phillips Bong." * * * "Er..no. Harper was elected because the people were sick of the other guys and wanted a change. Don't confuse electoral success (which came be attributed to a wide variety of factors) with broad support. That's the surest way to wind up on the sidelines." - Black Dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted October 13, 2005 Report Share Posted October 13, 2005 I don't believe schools should be indoctrinating vulnerable children with one political viewpoint or another, especially as they do such a lousy job of teaching the basics. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What do you call constantly reinforcing heterosexuality? Is that not also indoctrinating one political viewpoint? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Schools have never set out a course curriculum to "reinforce heterosexuality". They have certainly echoed the basic societal preference for heterosexuality, but that is not the same thing as setting out to "teach" something as "right" when massive numbers of the population disagree, especially when many parents, if not most, don't want their kids being taught how natural and normal homosexuality is. If you want to teach that to your kids, that's fine, but you shouldn't be trying to teach it to other people's kids against their will. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.