Guest eureka Posted May 1, 2005 Report Posted May 1, 2005 Why don't you read the Swiss Constitution, then? I have. It won't take much to understand what an ignorant oaf you are. It is in black and white and needs no legal interpretation. There is no country in the world as decentralized as Canada. Perhaps you could ask your teacher to explain the relevance of expenditures by government. Or are you still stuck with your fingerpainting? Quote
last_niceguy Posted May 1, 2005 Report Posted May 1, 2005 Perhaps you could ask your teacher to explain the relevance of expenditures by government. Or are you still stuck with your fingerpainting? Remind me never ever ever to get on your bad side. (But you make a good point!) Quote "Hearing nuns confessions is like being beaten to death with popcorn" - Bishop Fulton Sheen
Argus Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Why don't you read the Swiss Constitution, then? I have. Yes. The problem is you aren't very smart, and have the literary skills of a ten year old. A not very bright ten year old. It won't take much to understand what an ignorant oaf you are. It is in black and white and needs no legal interpretation. There is no country in the world as decentralized as Canada. If I were an ignorant oaf I'd hardly understand it, now would I? Instead I'd be swaggering around like you, under the illusion I was more than a braying jackass. Canada is not that decentralized at all. You simply lack the intelligence to understand the finer points of constitutional law and the seperation of powers. But once again, you are running off onto a side issue in a frantic effort to evade the questions put to you. I'm not terribly interested in discussing Swiss constitutional law, especially with someone as shrill and ignorant as you. Really, if federalist Canadians in Ontario or Quebec are so offended by the proposals in the infamous "firewall" letter, why aren't they marching in the streets to have their own provinces tear down their own equivalent "firewalls"? Again, every proposal in the "firewall" letter is a policy already in force in one or both of Canada's largest provinces. Why do these policies only constitute a threat to the nation when the #4 province considers adopting them? Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Guest eureka Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Why do you keep posting that paragraph as though it means something. Those proposals are not all in force in one or other provinces. Only someone of your lack of knowledge of Canada and Constitutional affairs could think that they are. Do you think that withdrawing from CPP; from the Canada Health Act; attempting to weasel out from transfer payments, and a couple of other like things, is the mark of a Canadian patriot? Do you think that Canada could long survive that? That is Harper in the raw and you are too dense to see it. Only Quebec has some of the "firewall" in place now, but not all since it constitutionally cannot complete the building. Quebec, you may not know this, has built its incomplete wall for the express purpose of dismembering the country. Would that come as a shock to you? Would it matter in your frenzied mind? You raise the issue of Switzerland as an example of a less centralized country than Canada, but, when you are presented with the reality that the opposite is the case, you "are not interested in Swiss Constitutional Law." You really are a piece of work. You are also a contemptible coward. Your blustering and hectoring would amuse me if I did not feel sorry for your sad, angry persona. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.